使用元启发式技术优化负载增长条件下各种负载模型的分布式发电机分配

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Muhammad Zubair Iftikhar , Kashif Imran , Muhammad Imran Akbar , Saim Ghafoor
{"title":"使用元启发式技术优化负载增长条件下各种负载模型的分布式发电机分配","authors":"Muhammad Zubair Iftikhar ,&nbsp;Kashif Imran ,&nbsp;Muhammad Imran Akbar ,&nbsp;Saim Ghafoor","doi":"10.1016/j.ref.2024.100550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Distribution network planning and operation are facing several problems, including asset congestion, voltage fluctuations, and system instability. The adequate planning and modeling of distributed generators and capacitor banks must quantify these problems. This article presents the optimal allocation of distributed generators in parallel with capacitor banks in distribution networks with single and multi-objectives using the Gazelle Optimization Algorithm (GOA) and Mountain Gazelle Optimization Algorithm (MGOA). The single objective framework includes technical objectives like minimization of active power losses. The multi-objective framework includes technical and non-technical objectives like simultaneously minimization of active power losses, voltage stability, and voltage deviation, and minimization of polluting greenhouse gases and total electricity purchase cost. Furthermore, these planning problems are investigated by three case studies on different nonlinear voltage-dependent models at two different loading conditions from future planning perspectives. The effectiveness and feasibility of the MGOA are evaluated on the IEEE standard 33 bus system. As a result, the MGOA demonstrates a remarkable reduction in technical and non-technical objectives in all types of distributed generator placement. Moreover, a comparative analysis of other existing research works validated the efficiency and feasibility of established algorithms at each use case with different load models by improving all the objective functions of network planning. In single-objective and multi-objective frameworks, the active power losses reduce to 94.42% and 93.57% in the voltage-independent model, respectively. Meanwhile, the non-technical objectives are also significantly improved for each load model, further validating the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29780,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Focus","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100550"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal distributed generators allocation with various load models under load growth using a meta-heuristic technique\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Zubair Iftikhar ,&nbsp;Kashif Imran ,&nbsp;Muhammad Imran Akbar ,&nbsp;Saim Ghafoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ref.2024.100550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Distribution network planning and operation are facing several problems, including asset congestion, voltage fluctuations, and system instability. The adequate planning and modeling of distributed generators and capacitor banks must quantify these problems. This article presents the optimal allocation of distributed generators in parallel with capacitor banks in distribution networks with single and multi-objectives using the Gazelle Optimization Algorithm (GOA) and Mountain Gazelle Optimization Algorithm (MGOA). The single objective framework includes technical objectives like minimization of active power losses. The multi-objective framework includes technical and non-technical objectives like simultaneously minimization of active power losses, voltage stability, and voltage deviation, and minimization of polluting greenhouse gases and total electricity purchase cost. Furthermore, these planning problems are investigated by three case studies on different nonlinear voltage-dependent models at two different loading conditions from future planning perspectives. The effectiveness and feasibility of the MGOA are evaluated on the IEEE standard 33 bus system. As a result, the MGOA demonstrates a remarkable reduction in technical and non-technical objectives in all types of distributed generator placement. Moreover, a comparative analysis of other existing research works validated the efficiency and feasibility of established algorithms at each use case with different load models by improving all the objective functions of network planning. In single-objective and multi-objective frameworks, the active power losses reduce to 94.42% and 93.57% in the voltage-independent model, respectively. Meanwhile, the non-technical objectives are also significantly improved for each load model, further validating the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable Energy Focus\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable Energy Focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

配电网络的规划和运行面临着一些问题,包括资产拥塞、电压波动和系统不稳定。分布式发电机和电容器组的适当规划和建模必须量化这些问题。本文利用瞪羚优化算法(GOA)和山地瞪羚优化算法(MGOA),介绍了配电网络中分布式发电机与电容器组并联的单目标和多目标优化配置。单目标框架包括有功功率损耗最小化等技术目标。多目标框架包括技术和非技术目标,如同时最小化有功功率损耗、电压稳定性和电压偏差,以及最小化温室气体污染和总购电成本。此外,还从未来规划的角度出发,对两种不同负载条件下的不同非线性电压相关模型进行了三个案例研究,以探讨这些规划问题。在 IEEE 标准 33 总线系统上评估了 MGOA 的有效性和可行性。结果表明,在所有类型的分布式发电机布置中,MGOA 都能显著降低技术和非技术目标。此外,通过对其他现有研究成果进行比较分析,验证了所建立的算法在不同负载模型的每种使用情况下的效率和可行性,改进了网络规划的所有目标函数。在单目标和多目标框架中,有功功率损耗在电压无关模型中分别降低了 94.42% 和 93.57%。同时,每个负载模型的非技术目标也得到了显著改善,进一步验证了所提算法的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimal distributed generators allocation with various load models under load growth using a meta-heuristic technique

Optimal distributed generators allocation with various load models under load growth using a meta-heuristic technique

Distribution network planning and operation are facing several problems, including asset congestion, voltage fluctuations, and system instability. The adequate planning and modeling of distributed generators and capacitor banks must quantify these problems. This article presents the optimal allocation of distributed generators in parallel with capacitor banks in distribution networks with single and multi-objectives using the Gazelle Optimization Algorithm (GOA) and Mountain Gazelle Optimization Algorithm (MGOA). The single objective framework includes technical objectives like minimization of active power losses. The multi-objective framework includes technical and non-technical objectives like simultaneously minimization of active power losses, voltage stability, and voltage deviation, and minimization of polluting greenhouse gases and total electricity purchase cost. Furthermore, these planning problems are investigated by three case studies on different nonlinear voltage-dependent models at two different loading conditions from future planning perspectives. The effectiveness and feasibility of the MGOA are evaluated on the IEEE standard 33 bus system. As a result, the MGOA demonstrates a remarkable reduction in technical and non-technical objectives in all types of distributed generator placement. Moreover, a comparative analysis of other existing research works validated the efficiency and feasibility of established algorithms at each use case with different load models by improving all the objective functions of network planning. In single-objective and multi-objective frameworks, the active power losses reduce to 94.42% and 93.57% in the voltage-independent model, respectively. Meanwhile, the non-technical objectives are also significantly improved for each load model, further validating the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy Focus
Renewable Energy Focus Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信