儿童肠套叠超声引导静水压减压术失败的预测因素:埃塞俄比亚一家专科中心的回顾性分析。

IF 1.7 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PHMT.S451832
Belachew Dejene Wondemagegnehu, Ephrem Nidaw Kerego, Tihtina Negussie Mammo, Amezene Tadesse Robele, Fisseha Temesgen Gebru, Woubedel Kiflu Aklilu
{"title":"儿童肠套叠超声引导静水压减压术失败的预测因素:埃塞俄比亚一家专科中心的回顾性分析。","authors":"Belachew Dejene Wondemagegnehu, Ephrem Nidaw Kerego, Tihtina Negussie Mammo, Amezene Tadesse Robele, Fisseha Temesgen Gebru, Woubedel Kiflu Aklilu","doi":"10.2147/PHMT.S451832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify factors predicting the failure of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The medical records of 174 children who underwent ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception over four years were reviewed at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. Patient's demography, clinical data, and sonography findings (type of intussusception, length of intussusception, presence of lead point, trapped fluid, lymph node, and free peritoneal fluid) were entered into SPSS 25 (IBM) and analyzed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success rate of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction was 81.6%. The sex, presence of abdominal cramps, vomiting, diarrhea, trapped lymph nodes on ultrasound, or history of upper respiratory tract infection had no association with hydrostatic reducibility. Currant jelly stool (OR 0.128; 95% CI, 0.27-0.616; P=0.01), Ileo-ileo colic intussusception (OR 0.055; 95% CI, 0.005-0.597; P=0.017), pathologic lead point (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.01-0.447; P=0.005) and abdominal distention (OR 0.209; 95% CI, 0.044-0.998; P=0.048) showed significant association with failed hydrostatic reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of currant jelly stool, ileo-ileo colic type intussusception, pathologic lead point, and abdominal distention are the most important predictors for failed ultrasound ultrasound-guided reduction intussusception in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":74410,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics","volume":"15 ","pages":"87-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10887998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Failure in Ultrasound-Guided Hydrostatic Reduction of Intussusception in Children: Retrospective Analysis in a Specialized Center in Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Belachew Dejene Wondemagegnehu, Ephrem Nidaw Kerego, Tihtina Negussie Mammo, Amezene Tadesse Robele, Fisseha Temesgen Gebru, Woubedel Kiflu Aklilu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PHMT.S451832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify factors predicting the failure of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The medical records of 174 children who underwent ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception over four years were reviewed at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. Patient's demography, clinical data, and sonography findings (type of intussusception, length of intussusception, presence of lead point, trapped fluid, lymph node, and free peritoneal fluid) were entered into SPSS 25 (IBM) and analyzed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success rate of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction was 81.6%. The sex, presence of abdominal cramps, vomiting, diarrhea, trapped lymph nodes on ultrasound, or history of upper respiratory tract infection had no association with hydrostatic reducibility. Currant jelly stool (OR 0.128; 95% CI, 0.27-0.616; P=0.01), Ileo-ileo colic intussusception (OR 0.055; 95% CI, 0.005-0.597; P=0.017), pathologic lead point (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.01-0.447; P=0.005) and abdominal distention (OR 0.209; 95% CI, 0.044-0.998; P=0.048) showed significant association with failed hydrostatic reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of currant jelly stool, ileo-ileo colic type intussusception, pathologic lead point, and abdominal distention are the most important predictors for failed ultrasound ultrasound-guided reduction intussusception in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"87-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10887998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PHMT.S451832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PHMT.S451832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定预测儿童超声引导下肠套叠静水压减压术失败的因素:对蒂库尔-安贝萨专科医院四年来接受超声引导下肠套叠静水压减压术的 174 名儿童的病历进行回顾。将患者的人口统计学、临床数据和超声波检查结果(肠套叠类型、肠套叠长度、有无导丝点、滞留液、淋巴结和游离腹腔积液)输入 SPSS 25 (IBM),并使用逻辑回归法进行分析:结果:超声引导下静水压缩宫术的总体成功率为 81.6%。性别、有无腹部绞痛、呕吐、腹泻、超声检查有无淋巴结肿大或有无上呼吸道感染病史与静水消融术的成功率无关。醋栗果冻便(OR 0.128;95% CI,0.27-0.616;P=0.01)、回肠结肠肠套叠(OR 0.055;95% CI,0.005-0.597;P=0.017)、病理性导联点(OR 0.66;95% CI,0.01-0.447;P=0.005)和腹胀(OR 0.209;95% CI,0.044-0.998;P=0.048)与静水减容失败有显著相关性:结论:出现醋栗果冻便、回肠绞窄型肠套叠、病理性引流点和腹胀是预测儿童超声引导下肠套叠减容失败的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of Failure in Ultrasound-Guided Hydrostatic Reduction of Intussusception in Children: Retrospective Analysis in a Specialized Center in Ethiopia.

Purpose: To identify factors predicting the failure of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children.

Patients and methods: The medical records of 174 children who underwent ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception over four years were reviewed at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. Patient's demography, clinical data, and sonography findings (type of intussusception, length of intussusception, presence of lead point, trapped fluid, lymph node, and free peritoneal fluid) were entered into SPSS 25 (IBM) and analyzed using logistic regression.

Results: The overall success rate of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction was 81.6%. The sex, presence of abdominal cramps, vomiting, diarrhea, trapped lymph nodes on ultrasound, or history of upper respiratory tract infection had no association with hydrostatic reducibility. Currant jelly stool (OR 0.128; 95% CI, 0.27-0.616; P=0.01), Ileo-ileo colic intussusception (OR 0.055; 95% CI, 0.005-0.597; P=0.017), pathologic lead point (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.01-0.447; P=0.005) and abdominal distention (OR 0.209; 95% CI, 0.044-0.998; P=0.048) showed significant association with failed hydrostatic reduction.

Conclusion: The presence of currant jelly stool, ileo-ileo colic type intussusception, pathologic lead point, and abdominal distention are the most important predictors for failed ultrasound ultrasound-guided reduction intussusception in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信