Kinjal Vasavada, Charles C Lin, Laith M Jazrawi, Jonathan Samuels
{"title":"使用免疫抑制剂接受关节镜手术的风湿病患者术后并发症。","authors":"Kinjal Vasavada, Charles C Lin, Laith M Jazrawi, Jonathan Samuels","doi":"10.1080/00913847.2024.2324363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are currently no guidelines on peri-arthroscopic management of immunosuppressive (IS) treatment in rheumatic disease patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to characterize the rheumatic disease patient population undergoing arthroscopy, compare the incidence of postoperative complications among patients who either remained on IS perioperatively, held IS perioperatively or were not on IS at baseline, and compare the incidence of postoperative complications by rheumatic disease type, medication type, and procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of all arthroscopic sports medicine surgeries in patients with a rheumatic disease diagnosis at our institution over an 11-year period. Patients on IS at baseline were grouped into those who remained on IS perioperatively or held all IS before the date of their surgery. These two groups were compared to patients who were not on IS at baseline. Incidence of postoperative complications was calculated for the three cohorts and by medication class, rheumatic disease type, and procedure risk. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine the statistical significance of between-group differences in postoperative complication incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1,316 rheumatic disease patients undergoing arthroscopy, with 214 of them taking IS medications at baseline. In total, 8.4% (<i>n</i> = 110) remained on IS perioperatively, 7.9% (<i>n</i> = 104) held IS perioperatively, and 83.7% (<i>n</i> = 1102) were not on IS at baseline. In all cohorts, seven patients experienced postoperative complications; six of whom experienced infections. Two (1.82%) occurred in patients remaining on IS perioperatively, zero infections occured in patients who held all IS, and four (0.36%) occured in patients who were not on any IS at baseline. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative infections or complication rates among the three cohorts or further subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of postoperative complications including infectious, major, and minor complications in patients on IS at the time of arthroscopy is low and acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51268,"journal":{"name":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","volume":" ","pages":"507-512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative complications in rheumatic disease patients undergoing arthroscopy on immunosuppression.\",\"authors\":\"Kinjal Vasavada, Charles C Lin, Laith M Jazrawi, Jonathan Samuels\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00913847.2024.2324363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are currently no guidelines on peri-arthroscopic management of immunosuppressive (IS) treatment in rheumatic disease patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to characterize the rheumatic disease patient population undergoing arthroscopy, compare the incidence of postoperative complications among patients who either remained on IS perioperatively, held IS perioperatively or were not on IS at baseline, and compare the incidence of postoperative complications by rheumatic disease type, medication type, and procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of all arthroscopic sports medicine surgeries in patients with a rheumatic disease diagnosis at our institution over an 11-year period. Patients on IS at baseline were grouped into those who remained on IS perioperatively or held all IS before the date of their surgery. These two groups were compared to patients who were not on IS at baseline. Incidence of postoperative complications was calculated for the three cohorts and by medication class, rheumatic disease type, and procedure risk. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine the statistical significance of between-group differences in postoperative complication incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1,316 rheumatic disease patients undergoing arthroscopy, with 214 of them taking IS medications at baseline. In total, 8.4% (<i>n</i> = 110) remained on IS perioperatively, 7.9% (<i>n</i> = 104) held IS perioperatively, and 83.7% (<i>n</i> = 1102) were not on IS at baseline. In all cohorts, seven patients experienced postoperative complications; six of whom experienced infections. Two (1.82%) occurred in patients remaining on IS perioperatively, zero infections occured in patients who held all IS, and four (0.36%) occured in patients who were not on any IS at baseline. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative infections or complication rates among the three cohorts or further subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of postoperative complications including infectious, major, and minor complications in patients on IS at the time of arthroscopy is low and acceptable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physician and Sportsmedicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"507-512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physician and Sportsmedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2024.2324363\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2024.2324363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目的:本研究的目的是描述接受关节镜手术的风湿病患者的特征,比较围手术期仍在使用免疫抑制剂、围手术期仍在使用免疫抑制剂或基线时未使用免疫抑制剂的患者的术后并发症发生率,并按风湿病类型、药物类型和手术方式比较术后并发症的发生率:我们对本机构 11 年来所有确诊风湿病患者的关节镜运动医学手术进行了回顾性分析。将基线期服用 IS 的患者分为围手术期仍服用 IS 或在手术日期前服用所有 IS 的两组。将这两组患者与基线时未服用 IS 的患者进行比较。按药物类别、风湿病类型和手术风险计算三组患者的术后并发症发生率。方差分析(ANOVA)、卡方检验(Chi-squared)和费雪精确检验用于确定术后并发症发生率组间差异的统计学意义:我们确定了 1316 名接受关节镜手术的风湿病患者,其中 214 人在基线时服用 IS 药物。总体而言,8.4%(n = 110)的患者围手术期仍在服用 IS,7.9%(n = 104)的患者围手术期仍在服用 IS,83.7%(n = 1102)的患者基线时未服用 IS。在所有组别中,有七名患者出现术后并发症,其中六名出现感染。围手术期仍在使用 IS 的患者发生了 2 例(1.82%),使用所有 IS 的患者发生了 0 例感染,基线时未使用任何 IS 的患者发生了 4 例(0.36%)。三个组别或更多亚组之间的术后感染或并发症发生率没有明显的统计学差异:结论:关节镜手术时服用 IS 的患者术后并发症(包括感染、主要并发症和次要并发症)的风险较低,可以接受。
Postoperative complications in rheumatic disease patients undergoing arthroscopy on immunosuppression.
Background: There are currently no guidelines on peri-arthroscopic management of immunosuppressive (IS) treatment in rheumatic disease patients.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to characterize the rheumatic disease patient population undergoing arthroscopy, compare the incidence of postoperative complications among patients who either remained on IS perioperatively, held IS perioperatively or were not on IS at baseline, and compare the incidence of postoperative complications by rheumatic disease type, medication type, and procedure.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all arthroscopic sports medicine surgeries in patients with a rheumatic disease diagnosis at our institution over an 11-year period. Patients on IS at baseline were grouped into those who remained on IS perioperatively or held all IS before the date of their surgery. These two groups were compared to patients who were not on IS at baseline. Incidence of postoperative complications was calculated for the three cohorts and by medication class, rheumatic disease type, and procedure risk. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine the statistical significance of between-group differences in postoperative complication incidence.
Results: We identified 1,316 rheumatic disease patients undergoing arthroscopy, with 214 of them taking IS medications at baseline. In total, 8.4% (n = 110) remained on IS perioperatively, 7.9% (n = 104) held IS perioperatively, and 83.7% (n = 1102) were not on IS at baseline. In all cohorts, seven patients experienced postoperative complications; six of whom experienced infections. Two (1.82%) occurred in patients remaining on IS perioperatively, zero infections occured in patients who held all IS, and four (0.36%) occured in patients who were not on any IS at baseline. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative infections or complication rates among the three cohorts or further subgroups.
Conclusion: The risk of postoperative complications including infectious, major, and minor complications in patients on IS at the time of arthroscopy is low and acceptable.
期刊介绍:
The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-reviewed, clinically oriented publication for primary care physicians. We examine the latest drug discoveries to advance treatment and recovery, and take into account the medical aspects of exercise therapy for a given condition. We cover the latest primary care-focused treatments serving the needs of our active patient population, and assess the limits these treatments govern in stabilization and recovery.
The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-to-peer method of communicating the latest research to aid primary care physicians’ advancement in methods of care and treatment. We routinely cover such topics as: managing chronic disease, surgical techniques in preventing and managing injuries, the latest advancements in treatments for helping patients lose weight, and related exercise and nutrition topics that can impact the patient during recovery and modification.