听力健康教育计划的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2313025
Luciana Bramati, Lys Maria Allenstein Gondim, Lucas Schmidt, Débora Lüders, Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Noémi Néron, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo, Adriana Bender Moreira de Lacerda
{"title":"听力健康教育计划的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Luciana Bramati, Lys Maria Allenstein Gondim, Lucas Schmidt, Débora Lüders, Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Noémi Néron, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo, Adriana Bender Moreira de Lacerda","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2313025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of hearing health education programs aimed at preventing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), of recreational and occupational origin, by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The search strategy was carried out in on five electronic databases, as well as referrals from experts. The risk of bias was judged, and the random effects meta-analysis was performed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Effectiveness studies that used educational intervention in hearing health and prevention of NIHL were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>42 studies were included. The Dangerous Decibels program was the only one that could be quantitatively analysed and showed improvement in the post-intervention period of up to one week [SMD = 0.60; CI95% = 0.38-0.82; I2 = 92.5%) and after eight weeks [SMD = 0.45; CI95% = 0.26-0.63; I2 = 81.6%) compared to the baseline. The certainty of evidence was judged as very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Dangerous Decibels program is effective after eight weeks of intervention. The other programs cannot be quantified. They still present uncertainty about their effectiveness. The level of certainty is still low for this assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"936-947"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of educational programs in hearing health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Luciana Bramati, Lys Maria Allenstein Gondim, Lucas Schmidt, Débora Lüders, Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Noémi Néron, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo, Adriana Bender Moreira de Lacerda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2024.2313025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of hearing health education programs aimed at preventing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), of recreational and occupational origin, by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The search strategy was carried out in on five electronic databases, as well as referrals from experts. The risk of bias was judged, and the random effects meta-analysis was performed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Effectiveness studies that used educational intervention in hearing health and prevention of NIHL were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>42 studies were included. The Dangerous Decibels program was the only one that could be quantitatively analysed and showed improvement in the post-intervention period of up to one week [SMD = 0.60; CI95% = 0.38-0.82; I2 = 92.5%) and after eight weeks [SMD = 0.45; CI95% = 0.26-0.63; I2 = 81.6%) compared to the baseline. The certainty of evidence was judged as very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Dangerous Decibels program is effective after eight weeks of intervention. The other programs cannot be quantified. They still present uncertainty about their effectiveness. The level of certainty is still low for this assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"936-947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2313025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2313025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过系统综述和荟萃分析,评估旨在预防娱乐性和职业性噪声性听力损失(NIHL)的听力健康教育计划的有效性:设计:通过五个电子数据库以及专家推荐进行了检索。对偏倚风险进行了判断,并进行了随机效应荟萃分析。对证据的确定性进行了评估:研究样本:纳入了对听力健康和预防 NIHL 进行教育干预的有效性研究:结果:共纳入 42 项研究。危险分贝 "项目是唯一可进行定量分析的项目,与基线相比,该项目在干预后一周[SMD = 0.60;CI95% = 0.38-0.82;I2 = 92.5%]和八周后[SMD = 0.45;CI95% = 0.26-0.63;I2 = 81.6%]均有改善。证据的确定性被判定为非常低:结论:经过八周的干预,"危险分贝 "计划是有效的。其他项目无法量化。它们的有效性仍存在不确定性。本次评估的证据确定性仍然很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of educational programs in hearing health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of hearing health education programs aimed at preventing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), of recreational and occupational origin, by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Design: The search strategy was carried out in on five electronic databases, as well as referrals from experts. The risk of bias was judged, and the random effects meta-analysis was performed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed.

Study sample: Effectiveness studies that used educational intervention in hearing health and prevention of NIHL were included.

Results: 42 studies were included. The Dangerous Decibels program was the only one that could be quantitatively analysed and showed improvement in the post-intervention period of up to one week [SMD = 0.60; CI95% = 0.38-0.82; I2 = 92.5%) and after eight weeks [SMD = 0.45; CI95% = 0.26-0.63; I2 = 81.6%) compared to the baseline. The certainty of evidence was judged as very low.

Conclusions: The Dangerous Decibels program is effective after eight weeks of intervention. The other programs cannot be quantified. They still present uncertainty about their effectiveness. The level of certainty is still low for this assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信