Pedro Rocha Carvalho, Marta Catarina Bernardo, Catarina Ribeiro Carvalho, Isabel Moreira, Sara Borges, José Pedro Guimarães, Fernando Fonseca Gonçalves, Pedro Mateus, José Paulo Fontes, Ilídio Moreira
{"title":"年龄休克指数是急性冠状动脉综合征患者心血管死亡的早期预测指标。","authors":"Pedro Rocha Carvalho, Marta Catarina Bernardo, Catarina Ribeiro Carvalho, Isabel Moreira, Sara Borges, José Pedro Guimarães, Fernando Fonseca Gonçalves, Pedro Mateus, José Paulo Fontes, Ilídio Moreira","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The shock index (SI), reflecting heart rate (HR) to SBP ratio, is established for predicting adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Exploring the age shock index (ASI), obtained by multiplying SI with age, could offer further insights into ACS prognosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess ASI's effectiveness in predicting in-hospital death in individuals with ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study encompassed patients with acute myocardial infarction, drawn from a national registry spanning October 2010 to January 2022. The optimal ASI threshold was established using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 312 patients were enrolled, exhibiting a mean age of 66 ± 13 years, with 72.3% being male and 47.5% having ST-elevation myocardial infarction. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80, identifying the optimal ASI cutoff as 44. Multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, established ASI ≥ 44 as an independent predictor of in-hospital death [hazard ratio: 3.09, 95% confidence interval: 2.56-3.71, P < 0.001]. Furthermore, ASI emerged as a notably superior predictor of in-hospital death compared to the SI (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC SI = 0.72, P < 0.0001), though it did not outperform the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC GRACE = 0.85, P < 0.001) or thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk index (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC TIMI = 0.84, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ASI offers an expedient mean to promptly identify ACS patients at elevated risk of in-hospital death. Its simplicity and effectiveness could render it a valuable tool for early risk stratification in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":"322-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age shock index as an early predictor of cardiovascular death in acute coronary syndrome patients.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Rocha Carvalho, Marta Catarina Bernardo, Catarina Ribeiro Carvalho, Isabel Moreira, Sara Borges, José Pedro Guimarães, Fernando Fonseca Gonçalves, Pedro Mateus, José Paulo Fontes, Ilídio Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The shock index (SI), reflecting heart rate (HR) to SBP ratio, is established for predicting adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Exploring the age shock index (ASI), obtained by multiplying SI with age, could offer further insights into ACS prognosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess ASI's effectiveness in predicting in-hospital death in individuals with ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study encompassed patients with acute myocardial infarction, drawn from a national registry spanning October 2010 to January 2022. The optimal ASI threshold was established using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 312 patients were enrolled, exhibiting a mean age of 66 ± 13 years, with 72.3% being male and 47.5% having ST-elevation myocardial infarction. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80, identifying the optimal ASI cutoff as 44. Multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, established ASI ≥ 44 as an independent predictor of in-hospital death [hazard ratio: 3.09, 95% confidence interval: 2.56-3.71, P < 0.001]. Furthermore, ASI emerged as a notably superior predictor of in-hospital death compared to the SI (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC SI = 0.72, P < 0.0001), though it did not outperform the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC GRACE = 0.85, P < 0.001) or thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk index (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC TIMI = 0.84, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ASI offers an expedient mean to promptly identify ACS patients at elevated risk of in-hospital death. Its simplicity and effectiveness could render it a valuable tool for early risk stratification in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"322-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Age shock index as an early predictor of cardiovascular death in acute coronary syndrome patients.
Background: The shock index (SI), reflecting heart rate (HR) to SBP ratio, is established for predicting adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Exploring the age shock index (ASI), obtained by multiplying SI with age, could offer further insights into ACS prognosis.
Objectives: Assess ASI's effectiveness in predicting in-hospital death in individuals with ACS.
Methods: This study encompassed patients with acute myocardial infarction, drawn from a national registry spanning October 2010 to January 2022. The optimal ASI threshold was established using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
Results: A total of 27 312 patients were enrolled, exhibiting a mean age of 66 ± 13 years, with 72.3% being male and 47.5% having ST-elevation myocardial infarction. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80, identifying the optimal ASI cutoff as 44. Multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, established ASI ≥ 44 as an independent predictor of in-hospital death [hazard ratio: 3.09, 95% confidence interval: 2.56-3.71, P < 0.001]. Furthermore, ASI emerged as a notably superior predictor of in-hospital death compared to the SI (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC SI = 0.72, P < 0.0001), though it did not outperform the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC GRACE = 0.85, P < 0.001) or thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk index (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC TIMI = 0.84, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The ASI offers an expedient mean to promptly identify ACS patients at elevated risk of in-hospital death. Its simplicity and effectiveness could render it a valuable tool for early risk stratification in this population.
期刊介绍:
Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management.
Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.