Nik M Faiz, Aneg L Cortes, Yuen-Fun Phang, Isabel M Gimeno
{"title":"优化监测在 CVI988 株基因组中插入网状内皮细胞增多症病毒长末端重复序列(CVI-LTR)的新型嵌合马雷克病疫苗体内复制的方案。","authors":"Nik M Faiz, Aneg L Cortes, Yuen-Fun Phang, Isabel M Gimeno","doi":"10.1080/03079457.2024.2324930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring Marek's disease (MD) vaccination is routinely done by evaluating the load of MD vaccine in the feather pulp (FP) between 7 and 10 days of age. However, attempts in our laboratory to detect a novel CVI-LTR vaccine in the FP samples from commercial flocks failed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the most suitable tissue and age to monitor CVI-LTR vaccination. We used two different commercial CVI988 vaccines as controls. One hundred and sixty 1-day-old commercial brown layers were vaccinated with either CVI-LTR, CVI988-A, CVI988-B or remained unvaccinated. Samples of the spleen, thymus, and bursa were collected at 3, 4, 5, and 6 days of age and samples of FP were collected at 7 and 21 days for DNA isolation. Our results showed that CVI-LTR replicated earlier than CVI988 vaccines in the lymphoid organs but was not detected in the FP at either 7 or at 21 days of age. We also confirmed that either the spleen or thymus collected at 4-6 days was a suitable sample to monitor CVI-LTR vaccination in commercial flocks. Finally, we evaluated the load of oncogenic MDV DNA in five commercial flocks that were vaccinated with either CVI-LTR + rHVT or CVI988-A + rHVT. The load of oncogenic MDV DNA was evaluated at 21 days in the FP in 20 chickens per group. Our results demonstrated that CVI-LTR was more successful in reducing oncogenic MDV DNA at 21 days of age than the CVI988-A strain.<b>RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS</b>CVI-LTR replicates in the thymus and spleen earlier than CVI988.CVI-LTR replicates in lymphoid organs but it cannot be detected in feather pulp.CVI-LTR reduced the load of oncogenic MDV DNA more efficiently than CVI988.</p>","PeriodicalId":8788,"journal":{"name":"Avian Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing protocols for monitoring <i>in vivo</i> replication of a novel chimeric Marek's disease vaccine with an insertion of the long terminal repeat of reticuloendotheliosis virus in the CVI988 strain genome (CVI-LTR).\",\"authors\":\"Nik M Faiz, Aneg L Cortes, Yuen-Fun Phang, Isabel M Gimeno\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03079457.2024.2324930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monitoring Marek's disease (MD) vaccination is routinely done by evaluating the load of MD vaccine in the feather pulp (FP) between 7 and 10 days of age. However, attempts in our laboratory to detect a novel CVI-LTR vaccine in the FP samples from commercial flocks failed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the most suitable tissue and age to monitor CVI-LTR vaccination. We used two different commercial CVI988 vaccines as controls. One hundred and sixty 1-day-old commercial brown layers were vaccinated with either CVI-LTR, CVI988-A, CVI988-B or remained unvaccinated. Samples of the spleen, thymus, and bursa were collected at 3, 4, 5, and 6 days of age and samples of FP were collected at 7 and 21 days for DNA isolation. Our results showed that CVI-LTR replicated earlier than CVI988 vaccines in the lymphoid organs but was not detected in the FP at either 7 or at 21 days of age. We also confirmed that either the spleen or thymus collected at 4-6 days was a suitable sample to monitor CVI-LTR vaccination in commercial flocks. Finally, we evaluated the load of oncogenic MDV DNA in five commercial flocks that were vaccinated with either CVI-LTR + rHVT or CVI988-A + rHVT. The load of oncogenic MDV DNA was evaluated at 21 days in the FP in 20 chickens per group. Our results demonstrated that CVI-LTR was more successful in reducing oncogenic MDV DNA at 21 days of age than the CVI988-A strain.<b>RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS</b>CVI-LTR replicates in the thymus and spleen earlier than CVI988.CVI-LTR replicates in lymphoid organs but it cannot be detected in feather pulp.CVI-LTR reduced the load of oncogenic MDV DNA more efficiently than CVI988.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avian Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avian Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2024.2324930\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2024.2324930","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing protocols for monitoring in vivo replication of a novel chimeric Marek's disease vaccine with an insertion of the long terminal repeat of reticuloendotheliosis virus in the CVI988 strain genome (CVI-LTR).
Monitoring Marek's disease (MD) vaccination is routinely done by evaluating the load of MD vaccine in the feather pulp (FP) between 7 and 10 days of age. However, attempts in our laboratory to detect a novel CVI-LTR vaccine in the FP samples from commercial flocks failed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the most suitable tissue and age to monitor CVI-LTR vaccination. We used two different commercial CVI988 vaccines as controls. One hundred and sixty 1-day-old commercial brown layers were vaccinated with either CVI-LTR, CVI988-A, CVI988-B or remained unvaccinated. Samples of the spleen, thymus, and bursa were collected at 3, 4, 5, and 6 days of age and samples of FP were collected at 7 and 21 days for DNA isolation. Our results showed that CVI-LTR replicated earlier than CVI988 vaccines in the lymphoid organs but was not detected in the FP at either 7 or at 21 days of age. We also confirmed that either the spleen or thymus collected at 4-6 days was a suitable sample to monitor CVI-LTR vaccination in commercial flocks. Finally, we evaluated the load of oncogenic MDV DNA in five commercial flocks that were vaccinated with either CVI-LTR + rHVT or CVI988-A + rHVT. The load of oncogenic MDV DNA was evaluated at 21 days in the FP in 20 chickens per group. Our results demonstrated that CVI-LTR was more successful in reducing oncogenic MDV DNA at 21 days of age than the CVI988-A strain.RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTSCVI-LTR replicates in the thymus and spleen earlier than CVI988.CVI-LTR replicates in lymphoid organs but it cannot be detected in feather pulp.CVI-LTR reduced the load of oncogenic MDV DNA more efficiently than CVI988.
期刊介绍:
Avian Pathology is the official journal of the World Veterinary Poultry Association and, since its first publication in 1972, has been a leading international journal for poultry disease scientists. It publishes material relevant to the entire field of infectious and non-infectious diseases of poultry and other birds. Accepted manuscripts will contribute novel data of interest to an international readership and will add significantly to knowledge and understanding of diseases, old or new. Subject areas include pathology, diagnosis, detection and characterisation of pathogens, infections of possible zoonotic importance, epidemiology, innate and immune responses, vaccines, gene sequences, genetics in relation to disease and physiological and biochemical changes in response to disease. First and subsequent reports of well-recognized diseases within a country are not acceptable unless they also include substantial new information about the disease or pathogen. Manuscripts on wild or pet birds should describe disease or pathogens in a significant number of birds, recognizing/suggesting serious potential impact on that species or that the disease or pathogen is of demonstrable relevance to poultry. Manuscripts on food-borne microorganisms acquired during or after processing, and those that catalogue the occurrence or properties of microorganisms, are unlikely to be considered for publication in the absence of data linking them to avian disease.