采血后血清和血浆中 microRNA 水平的差异及其时程变化

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Ichiro Wakabayashi , Mikio Marumo , Kazumi Ekawa , Takashi Daimon
{"title":"采血后血清和血浆中 microRNA 水平的差异及其时程变化","authors":"Ichiro Wakabayashi ,&nbsp;Mikio Marumo ,&nbsp;Kazumi Ekawa ,&nbsp;Takashi Daimon","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Serum and plasma are used for measurements of microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers of various diseases. However, no consistent findings have been obtained regarding differences in serum and plasma levels of miRNAs. The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in serum and plasma levels of total miRNAs and their time-course changes after blood collection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Venous blood was collected from healthy men, and samples were prepared at the time points of 0, 15, 30, 60 and 180 min after blood collection for plasma and after clot formation for serum. Levels of total miRNAs were analyzed by the hybridization method using the 3D-Gene miRNA Oligo chip.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>About one third of 2632 miRNAs tested showed levels high enough for comparison of serum and plasma levels and for investigation of their time-course changes. Levels of 299 miRNAs at time 0 were significantly different in serum and plasma. Levels of representative platelet-derived miRNAs including miR-185-5p, -22-3p and -320b were significantly higher in plasma than in serum, while levels of representative erythrocyte-derived miRNAs including miR-451a, -486-5p and -92a-3p were not significantly different in serum and plasma. Plasma levels of 173 miRNAs and 6 miRNAs showed significant decreasing and increasing tendencies, respectively, while there were no miRNAs in serum that showed significant time-course changes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results suggest that careful attention should be paid when comparing serum and plasma levels of miRNAs and that plasma samples should be prepared early after blood collection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000222/pdfft?md5=146a328bc3e969bfc01944d8a2c71253&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000222-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in serum and plasma levels of microRNAs and their time-course changes after blood collection\",\"authors\":\"Ichiro Wakabayashi ,&nbsp;Mikio Marumo ,&nbsp;Kazumi Ekawa ,&nbsp;Takashi Daimon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Serum and plasma are used for measurements of microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers of various diseases. However, no consistent findings have been obtained regarding differences in serum and plasma levels of miRNAs. The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in serum and plasma levels of total miRNAs and their time-course changes after blood collection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Venous blood was collected from healthy men, and samples were prepared at the time points of 0, 15, 30, 60 and 180 min after blood collection for plasma and after clot formation for serum. Levels of total miRNAs were analyzed by the hybridization method using the 3D-Gene miRNA Oligo chip.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>About one third of 2632 miRNAs tested showed levels high enough for comparison of serum and plasma levels and for investigation of their time-course changes. Levels of 299 miRNAs at time 0 were significantly different in serum and plasma. Levels of representative platelet-derived miRNAs including miR-185-5p, -22-3p and -320b were significantly higher in plasma than in serum, while levels of representative erythrocyte-derived miRNAs including miR-451a, -486-5p and -92a-3p were not significantly different in serum and plasma. Plasma levels of 173 miRNAs and 6 miRNAs showed significant decreasing and increasing tendencies, respectively, while there were no miRNAs in serum that showed significant time-course changes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results suggest that careful attention should be paid when comparing serum and plasma levels of miRNAs and that plasma samples should be prepared early after blood collection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000222/pdfft?md5=146a328bc3e969bfc01944d8a2c71253&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000222-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景血清和血浆中的微RNA(miRNA)被用作各种疾病的生物标志物。然而,关于血清和血浆中 miRNAs 水平的差异还没有一致的研究结果。本研究的目的是明确血清和血浆中总 miRNA 水平的差异及其在采血后的时程变化。方法采集健康男性的静脉血,在采血后 0、15、30、60 和 180 分钟的时间点制备血浆样本,在血凝块形成后制备血清样本。结果 在检测的 2632 个 miRNA 中,约有三分之一显示出足够高的水平,可用于比较血清和血浆水平以及研究其时间变化。299 个 miRNA 在 0 时的血清和血浆水平有显著差异。代表性的血小板衍生 miRNA(包括 miR-185-5p、-22-3p 和 -320b )在血浆中的水平显著高于血清,而代表性的红细胞衍生 miRNA(包括 miR-451a、-486-5p 和 -92a-3p )在血清和血浆中的水平没有显著差异。血浆中 173 个 miRNA 和 6 个 miRNA 的水平分别呈显著下降和上升趋势,而血清中没有 miRNA 呈显著的时间变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in serum and plasma levels of microRNAs and their time-course changes after blood collection

Background

Serum and plasma are used for measurements of microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers of various diseases. However, no consistent findings have been obtained regarding differences in serum and plasma levels of miRNAs. The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in serum and plasma levels of total miRNAs and their time-course changes after blood collection.

Methods

Venous blood was collected from healthy men, and samples were prepared at the time points of 0, 15, 30, 60 and 180 min after blood collection for plasma and after clot formation for serum. Levels of total miRNAs were analyzed by the hybridization method using the 3D-Gene miRNA Oligo chip.

Results

About one third of 2632 miRNAs tested showed levels high enough for comparison of serum and plasma levels and for investigation of their time-course changes. Levels of 299 miRNAs at time 0 were significantly different in serum and plasma. Levels of representative platelet-derived miRNAs including miR-185-5p, -22-3p and -320b were significantly higher in plasma than in serum, while levels of representative erythrocyte-derived miRNAs including miR-451a, -486-5p and -92a-3p were not significantly different in serum and plasma. Plasma levels of 173 miRNAs and 6 miRNAs showed significant decreasing and increasing tendencies, respectively, while there were no miRNAs in serum that showed significant time-course changes.

Conclusion

The results suggest that careful attention should be paid when comparing serum and plasma levels of miRNAs and that plasma samples should be prepared early after blood collection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信