Emilia Orologa, Georgios Chatzopoulos, Dimitrios Nikolaidis, Mary Kosmidis, H. Proios
{"title":"语言流畅性任务中反应时间测量的重要性","authors":"Emilia Orologa, Georgios Chatzopoulos, Dimitrios Nikolaidis, Mary Kosmidis, H. Proios","doi":"10.12681/psy_hps.34095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" \nVerbal fluency is a commonly used task in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. It assesses a person’s ability to generate relevant words, according to a given category within a limited amount of time. Phonemic (PF) and semantic (SF) fluency tasks reflect different aspects of language and executive function abilities. In the present study, we investigated first response latency as an additional measure of phonemic, semantic and excluded letter fluency of 44 healthy adults (aged 18 to 39 years old) divided in 2 groups, according to their education level. We investigated potential correlations between response times and education level. Preliminary results from a small sample show that when comparing phonemic, semantic and excluded letter tasks the shortest response time was observed in semantic fluency tasks whereas the excluded letter tasks have the longest (Z = -5.35, p < 0.0005). Education appeared to have a significant negative effect on the mean response times of the participants (for PF U = 137, p = 0.014; for ELF U = 141.5, p = 0.018; for SF t = 2.05, p = 0.046). These results constitute a potential underexamined way to investigate lexical organization and access in verbal fluency. Also, we noted that education contributes not only to overall performance but to response times as well.","PeriodicalId":123595,"journal":{"name":"Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society","volume":"46 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The importance of response times measures in verbal fluency tasks\",\"authors\":\"Emilia Orologa, Georgios Chatzopoulos, Dimitrios Nikolaidis, Mary Kosmidis, H. Proios\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/psy_hps.34095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" \\nVerbal fluency is a commonly used task in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. It assesses a person’s ability to generate relevant words, according to a given category within a limited amount of time. Phonemic (PF) and semantic (SF) fluency tasks reflect different aspects of language and executive function abilities. In the present study, we investigated first response latency as an additional measure of phonemic, semantic and excluded letter fluency of 44 healthy adults (aged 18 to 39 years old) divided in 2 groups, according to their education level. We investigated potential correlations between response times and education level. Preliminary results from a small sample show that when comparing phonemic, semantic and excluded letter tasks the shortest response time was observed in semantic fluency tasks whereas the excluded letter tasks have the longest (Z = -5.35, p < 0.0005). Education appeared to have a significant negative effect on the mean response times of the participants (for PF U = 137, p = 0.014; for ELF U = 141.5, p = 0.018; for SF t = 2.05, p = 0.046). These results constitute a potential underexamined way to investigate lexical organization and access in verbal fluency. Also, we noted that education contributes not only to overall performance but to response times as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society\",\"volume\":\"46 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.34095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.34095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
语言流畅性是临床和实验神经心理学中常用的一项任务。它评估的是一个人在有限的时间内根据给定类别生成相关词语的能力。语音(PF)和语义(SF)流利性任务反映了语言和执行功能能力的不同方面。在本研究中,我们对 44 名健康成年人(18 至 39 岁)的首次反应潜伏期进行了调查,作为音位、语义和排除字母流利性的额外测量指标。我们研究了反应时间与教育水平之间的潜在相关性。小样本的初步结果显示,在比较音位、语义和排除字母任务时,语义流利性任务的反应时间最短,而排除字母任务的反应时间最长(Z = -5.35,p < 0.0005)。教育程度似乎对参与者的平均反应时间有显著的负面影响(PF U = 137,p = 0.014;ELF U = 141.5,p = 0.018;SF t = 2.05,p = 0.046)。这些结果构成了一种潜在的、尚未得到充分研究的方法,可用于研究词汇组织和言语流利性中的词汇获取。此外,我们还注意到,教育程度不仅会影响总体成绩,还会影响反应时间。
The importance of response times measures in verbal fluency tasks
Verbal fluency is a commonly used task in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. It assesses a person’s ability to generate relevant words, according to a given category within a limited amount of time. Phonemic (PF) and semantic (SF) fluency tasks reflect different aspects of language and executive function abilities. In the present study, we investigated first response latency as an additional measure of phonemic, semantic and excluded letter fluency of 44 healthy adults (aged 18 to 39 years old) divided in 2 groups, according to their education level. We investigated potential correlations between response times and education level. Preliminary results from a small sample show that when comparing phonemic, semantic and excluded letter tasks the shortest response time was observed in semantic fluency tasks whereas the excluded letter tasks have the longest (Z = -5.35, p < 0.0005). Education appeared to have a significant negative effect on the mean response times of the participants (for PF U = 137, p = 0.014; for ELF U = 141.5, p = 0.018; for SF t = 2.05, p = 0.046). These results constitute a potential underexamined way to investigate lexical organization and access in verbal fluency. Also, we noted that education contributes not only to overall performance but to response times as well.