{"title":"Begum Rokeya 到 Arundhati Roy:妇女解放的无形梦想","authors":"Adil Ilahi","doi":"10.46291/ijospervol11iss1pp17-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both Begum Rokeya's earlier and Arundhati Roy's more recent voices have advocated for women's freedom in essentially the same ways. Although critics have examined how they raise their voices against women’s exploitation, the current situation of women’s suffering when comparing Rokeya and Arundhati’s dreams is not shown. In order to demonstrate a gap in their research, the study compared the conditions of women in Rokeya's literature with the state of current society by discussing Arundhati's works. This essay is written using Begum Rokeya's Sultana's Dream and Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things as primary sources. My attempt in this paper is to demonstrate how Begum Rokeya's vision of women's independence is still a dream by referring to relevant scholarly articles and interpreting the works of Arundhati Roy.","PeriodicalId":302537,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Begum Rokeya to Arundhati Roy: An Intangible Dream of Woman Emancipation\",\"authors\":\"Adil Ilahi\",\"doi\":\"10.46291/ijospervol11iss1pp17-30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Both Begum Rokeya's earlier and Arundhati Roy's more recent voices have advocated for women's freedom in essentially the same ways. Although critics have examined how they raise their voices against women’s exploitation, the current situation of women’s suffering when comparing Rokeya and Arundhati’s dreams is not shown. In order to demonstrate a gap in their research, the study compared the conditions of women in Rokeya's literature with the state of current society by discussing Arundhati's works. This essay is written using Begum Rokeya's Sultana's Dream and Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things as primary sources. My attempt in this paper is to demonstrate how Begum Rokeya's vision of women's independence is still a dream by referring to relevant scholarly articles and interpreting the works of Arundhati Roy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46291/ijospervol11iss1pp17-30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46291/ijospervol11iss1pp17-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
无论是 Begum Rokeya 早期的作品,还是 Arundhati Roy 近期的作品,都以基本相同的方式倡导妇女自由。尽管评论家们研究了她们如何发出反对剥削妇女的声音,但在比较罗克亚和阿伦达蒂-罗伊的梦想时,却没有显示出妇女受苦受难的现状。为了证明研究中的空白,本研究通过讨论阿伦达蒂的作品,将 Rokeya 文学作品中的女性状况与当前社会的状况进行了比较。本文以 Begum Rokeya 的《苏丹娜的梦》和 Arundhati Roy 的《小事之神》为主要资料来源。在本文中,我试图通过参考相关学术文章和解读阿伦达蒂-罗伊的作品,来说明贝古姆-罗克亚对妇女独立的憧憬仍然是一个梦想。
Begum Rokeya to Arundhati Roy: An Intangible Dream of Woman Emancipation
Both Begum Rokeya's earlier and Arundhati Roy's more recent voices have advocated for women's freedom in essentially the same ways. Although critics have examined how they raise their voices against women’s exploitation, the current situation of women’s suffering when comparing Rokeya and Arundhati’s dreams is not shown. In order to demonstrate a gap in their research, the study compared the conditions of women in Rokeya's literature with the state of current society by discussing Arundhati's works. This essay is written using Begum Rokeya's Sultana's Dream and Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things as primary sources. My attempt in this paper is to demonstrate how Begum Rokeya's vision of women's independence is still a dream by referring to relevant scholarly articles and interpreting the works of Arundhati Roy.