{"title":"阿姆哈拉语多音字 \"脸 \"的语义学特征","authors":"Sérgio N. Menete, Guiying Jiang","doi":"10.1075/rcl.00173.men","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines the figurative conceptualization of the polysemic Amharic word fit ‘face.’\n Based primarily on the “lexical approach,” the study shows how the meaning of “face” extends metaphorically and metonymically to\n such abstract concepts as time, emotions, and the intellect. Most of the face-related words in Amharic are also found in other\n languages, though cross-linguistic differences also exist. In the comparative study of body-part terms, a new approach is\n proposed, the “encompassing approach,” which claims that the contrastive study of body-part terms cannot be confined\n to a single term. Rather, it needs to consider the potential association between individual parts and specific cognitive\n processes. Once these processes are considered, the cross-linguistic variations between related body-part terms become marginal.\n We conclude that the (near)-universal status of body parts cannot be measured by examining the explicit use of a given part only.","PeriodicalId":509448,"journal":{"name":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","volume":"21 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The semantics of the polysemic Amharic word fit ‘face’\",\"authors\":\"Sérgio N. Menete, Guiying Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/rcl.00173.men\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study examines the figurative conceptualization of the polysemic Amharic word fit ‘face.’\\n Based primarily on the “lexical approach,” the study shows how the meaning of “face” extends metaphorically and metonymically to\\n such abstract concepts as time, emotions, and the intellect. Most of the face-related words in Amharic are also found in other\\n languages, though cross-linguistic differences also exist. In the comparative study of body-part terms, a new approach is\\n proposed, the “encompassing approach,” which claims that the contrastive study of body-part terms cannot be confined\\n to a single term. Rather, it needs to consider the potential association between individual parts and specific cognitive\\n processes. Once these processes are considered, the cross-linguistic variations between related body-part terms become marginal.\\n We conclude that the (near)-universal status of body parts cannot be measured by examining the explicit use of a given part only.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00173.men\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00173.men","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The semantics of the polysemic Amharic word fit ‘face’
This study examines the figurative conceptualization of the polysemic Amharic word fit ‘face.’
Based primarily on the “lexical approach,” the study shows how the meaning of “face” extends metaphorically and metonymically to
such abstract concepts as time, emotions, and the intellect. Most of the face-related words in Amharic are also found in other
languages, though cross-linguistic differences also exist. In the comparative study of body-part terms, a new approach is
proposed, the “encompassing approach,” which claims that the contrastive study of body-part terms cannot be confined
to a single term. Rather, it needs to consider the potential association between individual parts and specific cognitive
processes. Once these processes are considered, the cross-linguistic variations between related body-part terms become marginal.
We conclude that the (near)-universal status of body parts cannot be measured by examining the explicit use of a given part only.