社会评价压力能增强中心细节记忆、减少错误记忆并导致持续数天的侵入性记忆

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Mercedes L. Stanek , Kayla M. Boaz , Chloe N. Cordes , Taylor D. Niese , Kristen E. Long , Matthew S. Risner , John G. Blasco , Koen N. Suzelis , Kelsey M. Siereveld , Boyd R. Rorabaugh , Phillip R. Zoladz
{"title":"社会评价压力能增强中心细节记忆、减少错误记忆并导致持续数天的侵入性记忆","authors":"Mercedes L. Stanek ,&nbsp;Kayla M. Boaz ,&nbsp;Chloe N. Cordes ,&nbsp;Taylor D. Niese ,&nbsp;Kristen E. Long ,&nbsp;Matthew S. Risner ,&nbsp;John G. Blasco ,&nbsp;Koen N. Suzelis ,&nbsp;Kelsey M. Siereveld ,&nbsp;Boyd R. Rorabaugh ,&nbsp;Phillip R. Zoladz","doi":"10.1016/j.nlm.2024.107906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Few studies have quantified what an individual remembers about a laboratory-controlled stressor. Here, we aimed to replicate previous work by using a modified version of the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) to quantify participant memory for a stressful experience. We also aimed to extend this work by quantifying false and intrusive memories that ensued. One hundred and seven participants were exposed to the TSST (stress) or the friendly TSST (f-TSST; no stress). The TSST required participants to deliver a ten-minute speech in front of two laboratory panel members as part of a mock job interview; the f-TSST required participants to casually converse with the panel members about their interests. In both conditions, the panel members interacted with (central) or did not interact with (peripheral) several objects sitting on a desk in front of them. The next day, participants’ memory for the objects was assessed with recall and recognition tests. We also quantified participants’ intrusive memories on Days 2, 4, 6, and 8. Stressed participants recalled more central objects and exhibited greater recognition memory, particularly for central objects, than controls. Stress also led to less false recall and more intrusive memories on Days 2 and 4. Consistent with previous work, these findings suggest that participants exhibit enhanced memory for the central details of a stressful experience; they also extend prior work by showing that participants exposed to a stressor have less false memories and experience intrusive memories for several days following the event. The modified TSST paradigm used here may be useful for researchers studying not only what participants remember about a stressful event but also their susceptibility to intrusive memory formation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19102,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social evaluative stress enhances central detail memory, reduces false memory, and results in intrusive memories that last for days\",\"authors\":\"Mercedes L. Stanek ,&nbsp;Kayla M. Boaz ,&nbsp;Chloe N. Cordes ,&nbsp;Taylor D. Niese ,&nbsp;Kristen E. Long ,&nbsp;Matthew S. Risner ,&nbsp;John G. Blasco ,&nbsp;Koen N. Suzelis ,&nbsp;Kelsey M. Siereveld ,&nbsp;Boyd R. Rorabaugh ,&nbsp;Phillip R. Zoladz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nlm.2024.107906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Few studies have quantified what an individual remembers about a laboratory-controlled stressor. Here, we aimed to replicate previous work by using a modified version of the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) to quantify participant memory for a stressful experience. We also aimed to extend this work by quantifying false and intrusive memories that ensued. One hundred and seven participants were exposed to the TSST (stress) or the friendly TSST (f-TSST; no stress). The TSST required participants to deliver a ten-minute speech in front of two laboratory panel members as part of a mock job interview; the f-TSST required participants to casually converse with the panel members about their interests. In both conditions, the panel members interacted with (central) or did not interact with (peripheral) several objects sitting on a desk in front of them. The next day, participants’ memory for the objects was assessed with recall and recognition tests. We also quantified participants’ intrusive memories on Days 2, 4, 6, and 8. Stressed participants recalled more central objects and exhibited greater recognition memory, particularly for central objects, than controls. Stress also led to less false recall and more intrusive memories on Days 2 and 4. Consistent with previous work, these findings suggest that participants exhibit enhanced memory for the central details of a stressful experience; they also extend prior work by showing that participants exposed to a stressor have less false memories and experience intrusive memories for several days following the event. The modified TSST paradigm used here may be useful for researchers studying not only what participants remember about a stressful event but also their susceptibility to intrusive memory formation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742724000170\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742724000170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很少有研究能够量化个体对实验室控制的压力源的记忆。在这里,我们的目的是通过使用改良版的特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)来量化受试者对压力体验的记忆,从而复制之前的研究成果。我们还希望通过量化随之而来的错误记忆和侵入性记忆来扩展这项工作。107 名参与者接受了 TSST(压力)或友好 TSST(f-TSST;无压力)测试。作为模拟求职面试的一部分,TSST 要求参与者在两名实验室小组成员面前发表十分钟的演讲;f-TSST 要求参与者与小组成员就其兴趣随意交谈。在这两种情况下,小组成员都会与他们面前桌子上的几件物品互动(中心)或不互动(外围)。第二天,我们通过回忆和识别测试来评估参与者对这些物品的记忆。我们还对参与者在第 2、4、6 和 8 天的侵入性记忆进行了量化。与对照组相比,压力参与者回忆起更多的中心物体,并表现出更强的识别记忆,尤其是对中心物体的记忆。在第 2 天和第 4 天,压力还导致了更少的错误回忆和更多的侵入性记忆。与之前的研究结果一致,这些研究结果表明,受试者对应激经历的中心细节表现出更强的记忆力;这些研究结果还扩展了之前的研究,表明受试者在应激事件发生后的几天内,虚假记忆和干扰性记忆较少。这里使用的改良 TSST 范式可能对研究人员很有用,他们不仅可以研究参与者对压力事件的记忆,还可以研究他们对侵入性记忆形成的易感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social evaluative stress enhances central detail memory, reduces false memory, and results in intrusive memories that last for days

Few studies have quantified what an individual remembers about a laboratory-controlled stressor. Here, we aimed to replicate previous work by using a modified version of the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) to quantify participant memory for a stressful experience. We also aimed to extend this work by quantifying false and intrusive memories that ensued. One hundred and seven participants were exposed to the TSST (stress) or the friendly TSST (f-TSST; no stress). The TSST required participants to deliver a ten-minute speech in front of two laboratory panel members as part of a mock job interview; the f-TSST required participants to casually converse with the panel members about their interests. In both conditions, the panel members interacted with (central) or did not interact with (peripheral) several objects sitting on a desk in front of them. The next day, participants’ memory for the objects was assessed with recall and recognition tests. We also quantified participants’ intrusive memories on Days 2, 4, 6, and 8. Stressed participants recalled more central objects and exhibited greater recognition memory, particularly for central objects, than controls. Stress also led to less false recall and more intrusive memories on Days 2 and 4. Consistent with previous work, these findings suggest that participants exhibit enhanced memory for the central details of a stressful experience; they also extend prior work by showing that participants exposed to a stressor have less false memories and experience intrusive memories for several days following the event. The modified TSST paradigm used here may be useful for researchers studying not only what participants remember about a stressful event but also their susceptibility to intrusive memory formation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory publishes articles examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying learning and memory at all levels of analysis ranging from molecular biology to synaptic and neural plasticity and behavior. We are especially interested in manuscripts that examine the neural circuits and molecular mechanisms underlying learning, memory and plasticity in both experimental animals and human subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信