Hannah Park, Diane L. Schallert, Kyle M. Williams, Rachel E. Gaines, Jeonghyun Lee, Eunjeong Choi
{"title":"在学习过程中采取立场:在以计算机为媒介的同步课堂讨论中通过知识共建培养视角理解能力","authors":"Hannah Park, Diane L. Schallert, Kyle M. Williams, Rachel E. Gaines, Jeonghyun Lee, Eunjeong Choi","doi":"10.1007/s11412-023-09416-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study extends research on perspectival understanding (Greeno & van de Sande, 2007) by using Du Bois’ (2007) discourse work on stancetaking to investigate how students expressed their perspectives on course content through a variety of stances/positions as they negotiated meaning in online discussions. Participants were students in a hybrid graduate-level course with weekly synchronous computer-mediated discussions. Adapting Du Bois’ stancetaking triangle, we coded discussion transcripts for shifts in stance and for evidence of influence on students’ perspective taking as they considered course concepts. Findings were that stances and stance objects (that is, topics) were introduced as students collaborated in discussion, with an epistemic stance indicating students’ primary focus on wanting to learn and understand course concepts. Evaluative and affective stances were less frequent and most often intertwined with an epistemic stance but nevertheless important in supporting the group’s discussion. Synchronous online discussions afforded a venue for iterative discourse interactions of evaluation, positioning, and alignment and for shared knowledge co-construction and perspectival understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":47189,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking a stance in the process of learning: Developing perspectival understandings through knowledge co-construction during synchronous computer-mediated classroom discussion\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Park, Diane L. Schallert, Kyle M. Williams, Rachel E. Gaines, Jeonghyun Lee, Eunjeong Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11412-023-09416-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study extends research on perspectival understanding (Greeno & van de Sande, 2007) by using Du Bois’ (2007) discourse work on stancetaking to investigate how students expressed their perspectives on course content through a variety of stances/positions as they negotiated meaning in online discussions. Participants were students in a hybrid graduate-level course with weekly synchronous computer-mediated discussions. Adapting Du Bois’ stancetaking triangle, we coded discussion transcripts for shifts in stance and for evidence of influence on students’ perspective taking as they considered course concepts. Findings were that stances and stance objects (that is, topics) were introduced as students collaborated in discussion, with an epistemic stance indicating students’ primary focus on wanting to learn and understand course concepts. Evaluative and affective stances were less frequent and most often intertwined with an epistemic stance but nevertheless important in supporting the group’s discussion. Synchronous online discussions afforded a venue for iterative discourse interactions of evaluation, positioning, and alignment and for shared knowledge co-construction and perspectival understanding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09416-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09416-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究利用杜波依斯(2007 年)关于 "站姿 "的话语研究成果,扩展了关于 "视角理解 "的研究(Greeno & van de Sande, 2007),研究学生在在线讨论中协商意义时,如何通过各种站姿/立场表达他们对课程内容的观点。参与者为研究生混合课程的学生,每周进行一次以计算机为媒介的同步讨论。根据杜波依斯的 "立场三角",我们对讨论记录进行了编码,以了解学生在思考课程概念时立场的转变,以及影响学生观点取向的证据。研究结果表明,学生在合作讨论时引入了立场和立场对象(即话题),其中认识论立场表明学生的主要关注点是希望学习和理解课程概念。评价性和情感性立场较少出现,最常见的是与认识性立场交织在一起,但在支持小组讨论方面也很重要。同步在线讨论为评价、定位和调整的迭代话语互动以及共享知识的共同建构和观点理解提供了场所。
Taking a stance in the process of learning: Developing perspectival understandings through knowledge co-construction during synchronous computer-mediated classroom discussion
This study extends research on perspectival understanding (Greeno & van de Sande, 2007) by using Du Bois’ (2007) discourse work on stancetaking to investigate how students expressed their perspectives on course content through a variety of stances/positions as they negotiated meaning in online discussions. Participants were students in a hybrid graduate-level course with weekly synchronous computer-mediated discussions. Adapting Du Bois’ stancetaking triangle, we coded discussion transcripts for shifts in stance and for evidence of influence on students’ perspective taking as they considered course concepts. Findings were that stances and stance objects (that is, topics) were introduced as students collaborated in discussion, with an epistemic stance indicating students’ primary focus on wanting to learn and understand course concepts. Evaluative and affective stances were less frequent and most often intertwined with an epistemic stance but nevertheless important in supporting the group’s discussion. Synchronous online discussions afforded a venue for iterative discourse interactions of evaluation, positioning, and alignment and for shared knowledge co-construction and perspectival understanding.
期刊介绍:
An official publication of the International Society of the Learning Sciences, the International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (IJCSCL) fosters a deep understanding of the nature, theory, and practice of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). The journal serves as a forum for experts from such disciplines as education, computer science, information technology, psychology, communications, linguistics, anthropology, sociology, and business. Articles investigate how to design the technological settings for collaboration and how people learn in the context of collaborative activity.