言语领域的和谐：纳赫-达吉斯坦语中的外部一致

IF 1.6 1区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Linguistic Inquiry Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1162/ling_a_00528

Dmitry Ganenkov

{"title":"言语领域的和谐：纳赫-达吉斯坦语中的外部一致","authors":"Dmitry Ganenkov","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses agreeing ablatives in Aqusha Dargwa (Nakh-Daghestanian), arguing that morphological agreement in gender–number that these constituents display with the clausemate absolutive argument is not an instance of Agree, but should rather be analyzed as the result of Concord. The argument relies on a difference between Agree and Concord with regard to c-command. The article explores the behavior of the ablative complement to the vP-adjoined adverb ‘secretly’ and demonstrates that gender–number agreement on the complement is best predicted by Concord.","PeriodicalId":48044,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concord in the Verbal Domain: External Agreement in Nakh-Daghestanian\",\"authors\":\"Dmitry Ganenkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/ling_a_00528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses agreeing ablatives in Aqusha Dargwa (Nakh-Daghestanian), arguing that morphological agreement in gender–number that these constituents display with the clausemate absolutive argument is not an instance of Agree, but should rather be analyzed as the result of Concord. The argument relies on a difference between Agree and Concord with regard to c-command. The article explores the behavior of the ablative complement to the vP-adjoined adverb ‘secretly’ and demonstrates that gender–number agreement on the complement is best predicted by Concord.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00528\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00528","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

文章讨论了 Aqusha Dargwa（Nakh-Daghestanian）中的同意消元，认为这些成分与从句绝对论点在性别-数量上表现出的形态一致不是同意的实例，而应被分析为一致的结果。这一论证依赖于 Agree 和 Concord 在 c-command 方面的差异。文章探讨了与 vP 相接的副词 "secretly "的消格补语的行为，并证明 Concord 最能预测补语的性别-数量一致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Concord in the Verbal Domain: External Agreement in Nakh-Daghestanian

The article discusses agreeing ablatives in Aqusha Dargwa (Nakh-Daghestanian), arguing that morphological agreement in gender–number that these constituents display with the clausemate absolutive argument is not an instance of Agree, but should rather be analyzed as the result of Concord. The argument relies on a difference between Agree and Concord with regard to c-command. The article explores the behavior of the ablative complement to the vP-adjoined adverb ‘secretly’ and demonstrates that gender–number agreement on the complement is best predicted by Concord.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Linguistic Inquiry Multiple-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Linguistic Inquiry leads the field in research on current topics in linguistics. This key resource explores new theoretical developments based on the latest international scholarship, capturing the excitement of contemporary debate in full-scale articles as well as shorter contributions (Squibs and Discussion) and more extensive commentary (Remarks and Replies).