从统计角度看通过聚焦束电子探针显微分析法推断出的多相地层成分的岩石学用途

IF 2.7 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Daniel A. Coulthard Jr, Yoshiyuki Iizuka, Georg F. Zellmer, Raimundo Brahm
{"title":"从统计角度看通过聚焦束电子探针显微分析法推断出的多相地层成分的岩石学用途","authors":"Daniel A. Coulthard Jr,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Iizuka,&nbsp;Georg F. Zellmer,&nbsp;Raimundo Brahm","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polyphase groundmasses (micro-scale minerals with or without glass) are generated from silicate liquids during the cooling of natural lavas often alongside larger minerals formed long before eruption. Many researchers have posited that compositions gleaned from the analysis of groundmasses closely approximate the compositions of the melts they were derived from, and these have been used frequently to model pre-eruptive magma conditions. However, it is difficult to confidently identify and sample these groundmasses once they are formed. Using a sample of lava that exhibits a wide degree of textural variation (ranging from holocrystalline to hypohyaline) we show that compositions of groundmasses sampled using defocused electron beams are significantly different from glass compositions in terms of mean composition and covariance. Despite this, several groundmass compositions qualify as ‘in equilibrium’ with matrix/rim olivine. When processed using available thermometers, however, modelled equilibrium temperatures are significantly higher than those produced using glass data, on average. Because of this, we prescribe caution in using polyphase groundmass data generated using defocused beam analysis even as a rudimentary approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"48 2","pages":"345-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical Perspective on the Petrological Utility of Polyphase Groundmass Compositions Inferred via Defocused Beam Electron Probe Microanalysis\",\"authors\":\"Daniel A. Coulthard Jr,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Iizuka,&nbsp;Georg F. Zellmer,&nbsp;Raimundo Brahm\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggr.12546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Polyphase groundmasses (micro-scale minerals with or without glass) are generated from silicate liquids during the cooling of natural lavas often alongside larger minerals formed long before eruption. Many researchers have posited that compositions gleaned from the analysis of groundmasses closely approximate the compositions of the melts they were derived from, and these have been used frequently to model pre-eruptive magma conditions. However, it is difficult to confidently identify and sample these groundmasses once they are formed. Using a sample of lava that exhibits a wide degree of textural variation (ranging from holocrystalline to hypohyaline) we show that compositions of groundmasses sampled using defocused electron beams are significantly different from glass compositions in terms of mean composition and covariance. Despite this, several groundmass compositions qualify as ‘in equilibrium’ with matrix/rim olivine. When processed using available thermometers, however, modelled equilibrium temperatures are significantly higher than those produced using glass data, on average. Because of this, we prescribe caution in using polyphase groundmass data generated using defocused beam analysis even as a rudimentary approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"345-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12546\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12546","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多相岩浆(含或不含玻璃的微尺度矿物)是在天然熔岩冷却过程中由硅酸盐液体生成的,通常与在喷发前很久就已形成的较大矿物并存。许多研究人员都认为,通过分析地层岩浆获得的成分与它们所产生的熔体成分非常接近,因此这些地层岩浆经常被用来模拟岩浆喷发前的状况。然而,这些岩浆一旦形成,就很难对其进行可靠的识别和取样。我们利用质地差异较大的熔岩样本(从全晶质到次透明质)表明,利用离焦电子束采样的岩浆成分在平均成分和协方差方面与玻璃成分有显著差异。尽管如此,仍有几种岩浆成分与基质/边缘橄榄石处于 "平衡 "状态。然而,在使用现有温度计进行处理时,模拟平衡温度平均明显高于使用玻璃数据得出的平衡温度。因此,我们建议在使用偏焦光束分析法生成的多相岩浆数据时,即使是作为一种基本方法,也要慎之又慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Statistical Perspective on the Petrological Utility of Polyphase Groundmass Compositions Inferred via Defocused Beam Electron Probe Microanalysis

Statistical Perspective on the Petrological Utility of Polyphase Groundmass Compositions Inferred via Defocused Beam Electron Probe Microanalysis

Statistical Perspective on the Petrological Utility of Polyphase Groundmass Compositions Inferred via Defocused Beam Electron Probe Microanalysis

Polyphase groundmasses (micro-scale minerals with or without glass) are generated from silicate liquids during the cooling of natural lavas often alongside larger minerals formed long before eruption. Many researchers have posited that compositions gleaned from the analysis of groundmasses closely approximate the compositions of the melts they were derived from, and these have been used frequently to model pre-eruptive magma conditions. However, it is difficult to confidently identify and sample these groundmasses once they are formed. Using a sample of lava that exhibits a wide degree of textural variation (ranging from holocrystalline to hypohyaline) we show that compositions of groundmasses sampled using defocused electron beams are significantly different from glass compositions in terms of mean composition and covariance. Despite this, several groundmass compositions qualify as ‘in equilibrium’ with matrix/rim olivine. When processed using available thermometers, however, modelled equilibrium temperatures are significantly higher than those produced using glass data, on average. Because of this, we prescribe caution in using polyphase groundmass data generated using defocused beam analysis even as a rudimentary approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信