{"title":"公共交通如何为多伦多的大专学生服务?基于效用的非强制性出行公交可达性分析","authors":"Patrick Loa, Khandker Nurul Habib","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10469-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Post-secondary students are a segment of the population whose activity-travel behaviour is not well understood. In particular, there is a relative dearth of studies that have examined the determinants of behaviours related to participation in out-of-home activities among post-secondary students. This study uses data from a web-based survey administered to students attending universities in Toronto to examine the determinants of the location choice decisions of these individuals when using transit to participate in non-mandatory activities. Additionally, count- and utility-based measures of accessibility by transit for university students in Toronto are calculated and compared. The specification of the location choice model offers insights into the determinants of location choice decisions made by university students for non-mandatory trips. The results highlight the impacts of transit level-of-service and land use attributes on location choice decisions. Moreover, the findings suggest that the impacts of these attributes can differ based on socio-demographic characteristics. The comparison of count- and utility-based accessibility measures underscores the shortcomings of the former, which stem from the treatment of all opportunities as equally attractive. The results of this study aim to contribute to the literature by offering insights into an aspect of the activity-travel behaviour of post-secondary students that has received relatively little attention. Similarly, the results of the study can be used to help inform planning decisions by shedding light on the activity-travel behaviour of a segment of the population that has typically been underrepresented in traditional household travel surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does public transit serve post-secondary students in Toronto? A utility-based analysis of accessibility by transit for non-mandatory trips\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Loa, Khandker Nurul Habib\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-024-10469-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Post-secondary students are a segment of the population whose activity-travel behaviour is not well understood. In particular, there is a relative dearth of studies that have examined the determinants of behaviours related to participation in out-of-home activities among post-secondary students. This study uses data from a web-based survey administered to students attending universities in Toronto to examine the determinants of the location choice decisions of these individuals when using transit to participate in non-mandatory activities. Additionally, count- and utility-based measures of accessibility by transit for university students in Toronto are calculated and compared. The specification of the location choice model offers insights into the determinants of location choice decisions made by university students for non-mandatory trips. The results highlight the impacts of transit level-of-service and land use attributes on location choice decisions. Moreover, the findings suggest that the impacts of these attributes can differ based on socio-demographic characteristics. The comparison of count- and utility-based accessibility measures underscores the shortcomings of the former, which stem from the treatment of all opportunities as equally attractive. The results of this study aim to contribute to the literature by offering insights into an aspect of the activity-travel behaviour of post-secondary students that has received relatively little attention. Similarly, the results of the study can be used to help inform planning decisions by shedding light on the activity-travel behaviour of a segment of the population that has typically been underrepresented in traditional household travel surveys.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10469-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10469-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
How does public transit serve post-secondary students in Toronto? A utility-based analysis of accessibility by transit for non-mandatory trips
Post-secondary students are a segment of the population whose activity-travel behaviour is not well understood. In particular, there is a relative dearth of studies that have examined the determinants of behaviours related to participation in out-of-home activities among post-secondary students. This study uses data from a web-based survey administered to students attending universities in Toronto to examine the determinants of the location choice decisions of these individuals when using transit to participate in non-mandatory activities. Additionally, count- and utility-based measures of accessibility by transit for university students in Toronto are calculated and compared. The specification of the location choice model offers insights into the determinants of location choice decisions made by university students for non-mandatory trips. The results highlight the impacts of transit level-of-service and land use attributes on location choice decisions. Moreover, the findings suggest that the impacts of these attributes can differ based on socio-demographic characteristics. The comparison of count- and utility-based accessibility measures underscores the shortcomings of the former, which stem from the treatment of all opportunities as equally attractive. The results of this study aim to contribute to the literature by offering insights into an aspect of the activity-travel behaviour of post-secondary students that has received relatively little attention. Similarly, the results of the study can be used to help inform planning decisions by shedding light on the activity-travel behaviour of a segment of the population that has typically been underrepresented in traditional household travel surveys.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.