秋水仙碱对预防房颤消融术后复发的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Elísio Bulhões, Cynthia Florêncio de Mesquita, Isabela Madeira de Sá Pacheco, Vanessa Karlinski Vizentin
{"title":"秋水仙碱对预防房颤消融术后复发的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Elísio Bulhões, Cynthia Florêncio de Mesquita, Isabela Madeira de Sá Pacheco, Vanessa Karlinski Vizentin","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01770-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter ablation has become a widely accepted treatment for atrial fibrillation, but early recurrences remain a challenge, often attributed to inflammatory responses triggered during the procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of colchicine in preventing short-term AF recurrence post-ablation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing use of colchicine and placebo in patients after AF ablation. Outcomes included AF recurrence, GI side effects, and hospitalization. R program (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies, including 1592 patients, were analyzed. Pooled results revealed no statistically significant decrease in AF recurrence (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.48-1.12; p = 0.153) and pericarditis rates (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.26-1.72; p = 0.403) with colchicine use. No significant difference in hospitalization rates was observed between colchicine and placebo groups (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.63-1.59; p = 0.996). In addition, gastrointestinal side effects were notably higher in the colchicine group (OR 4.84; 95% CI 2.58-9.05; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic use of colchicine after atrial ablation was not associated with a reduction in AF recurrence and pericarditis rates. In addition, there was no difference in the rate of all-cause hospitalization between the groups, and colchicine use was associated with gastrointestinal adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1951-1958"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of colchicine on the prevention of AF recurrence after atrial ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Elísio Bulhões, Cynthia Florêncio de Mesquita, Isabela Madeira de Sá Pacheco, Vanessa Karlinski Vizentin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01770-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter ablation has become a widely accepted treatment for atrial fibrillation, but early recurrences remain a challenge, often attributed to inflammatory responses triggered during the procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of colchicine in preventing short-term AF recurrence post-ablation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing use of colchicine and placebo in patients after AF ablation. Outcomes included AF recurrence, GI side effects, and hospitalization. R program (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies, including 1592 patients, were analyzed. Pooled results revealed no statistically significant decrease in AF recurrence (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.48-1.12; p = 0.153) and pericarditis rates (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.26-1.72; p = 0.403) with colchicine use. No significant difference in hospitalization rates was observed between colchicine and placebo groups (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.63-1.59; p = 0.996). In addition, gastrointestinal side effects were notably higher in the colchicine group (OR 4.84; 95% CI 2.58-9.05; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic use of colchicine after atrial ablation was not associated with a reduction in AF recurrence and pericarditis rates. In addition, there was no difference in the rate of all-cause hospitalization between the groups, and colchicine use was associated with gastrointestinal adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1951-1958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01770-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01770-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:导管消融术已成为广泛接受的心房颤动治疗方法,但早期复发仍是一个难题,这通常归因于手术过程中引发的炎症反应。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估秋水仙碱预防消融术后房颤短期复发的有效性:方法:检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中对房颤消融术后患者使用秋水仙碱和安慰剂进行比较的研究。结果包括房颤复发、消化道副作用和住院治疗。统计分析使用 R 程序(4.3.2 版)。用I2统计量评估异质性:结果:共分析了五项研究,包括 1592 名患者。汇总结果显示,使用秋水仙碱后,房颤复发率(OR 0.74;95% CI 0.48-1.12;P = 0.153)和心包炎发生率(OR 0.67;95% CI 0.26-1.72;P = 0.403)没有统计学意义上的显著下降。秋水仙碱组和安慰剂组的住院率无明显差异(OR 1.00;95% CI 0.63-1.59;P = 0.996)。此外,胃肠道副作用在秋水仙碱组明显较高(OR 4.84;95% CI 2.58-9.05;P 结论:秋水仙碱组与安慰剂组的住院率存在明显差异(OR 1.00;95% CI 0.63-1.59;P = 0.996):心房消融术后预防性使用秋水仙碱与降低房颤复发率和心包炎发生率无关。此外,两组的全因住院率没有差异,使用秋水仙碱与胃肠道不良事件有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of colchicine on the prevention of AF recurrence after atrial ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effects of colchicine on the prevention of AF recurrence after atrial ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Catheter ablation has become a widely accepted treatment for atrial fibrillation, but early recurrences remain a challenge, often attributed to inflammatory responses triggered during the procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of colchicine in preventing short-term AF recurrence post-ablation.

Method: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing use of colchicine and placebo in patients after AF ablation. Outcomes included AF recurrence, GI side effects, and hospitalization. R program (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

Results: Five studies, including 1592 patients, were analyzed. Pooled results revealed no statistically significant decrease in AF recurrence (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.48-1.12; p = 0.153) and pericarditis rates (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.26-1.72; p = 0.403) with colchicine use. No significant difference in hospitalization rates was observed between colchicine and placebo groups (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.63-1.59; p = 0.996). In addition, gastrointestinal side effects were notably higher in the colchicine group (OR 4.84; 95% CI 2.58-9.05; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Prophylactic use of colchicine after atrial ablation was not associated with a reduction in AF recurrence and pericarditis rates. In addition, there was no difference in the rate of all-cause hospitalization between the groups, and colchicine use was associated with gastrointestinal adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信