社会过程与犹豫不决的母亲为子女接种 COVID-19 疫苗。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Community Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1007/s10900-024-01340-x
Don E Willis, Rachel S Purvis, Ramey Moore, Ji Li, James P Selig, Tabasum Imran, Stacy Zimmerman, Pearl A McElfish
{"title":"社会过程与犹豫不决的母亲为子女接种 COVID-19 疫苗。","authors":"Don E Willis, Rachel S Purvis, Ramey Moore, Ji Li, James P Selig, Tabasum Imran, Stacy Zimmerman, Pearl A McElfish","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01340-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate relationships between pediatric COVID-19 vaccination and social processes of healthcare provider recommendations and school encouragement to provide insights into social processes that may support pediatric COVID-19 vaccination among hesitant mothers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed survey data from a subsample (n = 509) of vaccine-hesitant mothers to child patients (ages 2 to 17) in regional clinics across Arkansas. Data were collected between September 16th and December 6th, 2022. Full information maximum likelihood multivariable logistic regression was conducted to evaluate associations with pediatric COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted odds of pediatric COVID-19 vaccination were more than three times greater when a child's healthcare provider recommended vaccination compared to when they did not (aOR = 3.52; 95% CI[2.06, 6.01]). Adjusted odds of pediatric COVID-19 vaccination were 85% greater when a child's school encouraged parents to vaccinate compared to when the school did not (aOR = 1.85; 95% CI[1.13, 3.03]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For pediatric COVID-19 vaccination, having a personal healthcare provider is not significantly different from having no personal healthcare provider if they do not recommend the child be vaccinated.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Clinical and public health interventions should consider social processes of healthcare provider recommendations and school encouragement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Processes and COVID-19 Vaccination of Children of Hesitant Mothers.\",\"authors\":\"Don E Willis, Rachel S Purvis, Ramey Moore, Ji Li, James P Selig, Tabasum Imran, Stacy Zimmerman, Pearl A McElfish\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10900-024-01340-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate relationships between pediatric COVID-19 vaccination and social processes of healthcare provider recommendations and school encouragement to provide insights into social processes that may support pediatric COVID-19 vaccination among hesitant mothers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed survey data from a subsample (n = 509) of vaccine-hesitant mothers to child patients (ages 2 to 17) in regional clinics across Arkansas. Data were collected between September 16th and December 6th, 2022. Full information maximum likelihood multivariable logistic regression was conducted to evaluate associations with pediatric COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted odds of pediatric COVID-19 vaccination were more than three times greater when a child's healthcare provider recommended vaccination compared to when they did not (aOR = 3.52; 95% CI[2.06, 6.01]). Adjusted odds of pediatric COVID-19 vaccination were 85% greater when a child's school encouraged parents to vaccinate compared to when the school did not (aOR = 1.85; 95% CI[1.13, 3.03]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For pediatric COVID-19 vaccination, having a personal healthcare provider is not significantly different from having no personal healthcare provider if they do not recommend the child be vaccinated.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Clinical and public health interventions should consider social processes of healthcare provider recommendations and school encouragement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-024-01340-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-024-01340-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的调查小儿 COVID-19 疫苗接种与医疗保健提供者建议和学校鼓励等社会过程之间的关系,以深入了解可能支持犹豫不决的母亲接种小儿 COVID-19 疫苗的社会过程:我们分析了来自阿肯色州地区诊所的疫苗接种犹豫不决的母亲对儿童患者(2 至 17 岁)的调查数据(n = 509)。数据收集时间为 2022 年 9 月 16 日至 12 月 6 日。采用全信息最大似然多变量逻辑回归评估与小儿COVID-19疫苗接种的关系:如果儿童的医疗保健提供者推荐接种小儿 COVID-19 疫苗,则调整后的接种几率是不推荐接种的三倍多(aOR = 3.52; 95% CI[2.06, 6.01])。如果儿童所在学校鼓励家长接种疫苗,则调整后的小儿 COVID-19 疫苗接种几率比不鼓励家长接种疫苗的几率高 85% (aOR = 1.85; 95% CI[1.13, 3.03]):就小儿 COVID-19 疫苗接种而言,如果个人医疗保健提供者不建议儿童接种疫苗,那么有个人医疗保健提供者与没有个人医疗保健提供者并无明显区别:临床和公共卫生干预措施应考虑医疗保健提供者建议和学校鼓励的社会过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Processes and COVID-19 Vaccination of Children of Hesitant Mothers.

Objective: Investigate relationships between pediatric COVID-19 vaccination and social processes of healthcare provider recommendations and school encouragement to provide insights into social processes that may support pediatric COVID-19 vaccination among hesitant mothers.

Methods: We analyzed survey data from a subsample (n = 509) of vaccine-hesitant mothers to child patients (ages 2 to 17) in regional clinics across Arkansas. Data were collected between September 16th and December 6th, 2022. Full information maximum likelihood multivariable logistic regression was conducted to evaluate associations with pediatric COVID-19 vaccination.

Results: Adjusted odds of pediatric COVID-19 vaccination were more than three times greater when a child's healthcare provider recommended vaccination compared to when they did not (aOR = 3.52; 95% CI[2.06, 6.01]). Adjusted odds of pediatric COVID-19 vaccination were 85% greater when a child's school encouraged parents to vaccinate compared to when the school did not (aOR = 1.85; 95% CI[1.13, 3.03]).

Conclusions: For pediatric COVID-19 vaccination, having a personal healthcare provider is not significantly different from having no personal healthcare provider if they do not recommend the child be vaccinated.

Practice implications: Clinical and public health interventions should consider social processes of healthcare provider recommendations and school encouragement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信