老年结直肠癌患者灌注雷替曲塞的安全性研究及其对腹腔灌洗液中 CEA mRNA 的影响

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Bo Xie, Yuanyuan Wang, Jianguang Jia, Jing Li, Hu Wang
{"title":"老年结直肠癌患者灌注雷替曲塞的安全性研究及其对腹腔灌洗液中 CEA mRNA 的影响","authors":"Bo Xie, Yuanyuan Wang, Jianguang Jia, Jing Li, Hu Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an effective way to kill free tumor cells in the abdominal cavity. The safety and efficacy of raltitrexed perfusion during radical surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with computer-generated random allocation sequences, 116 elderly patients with colorectal cancer who received radical surgery were randomly grouped into the raltitrexed intraperitoneal perfusion group or the saline intraperitoneal perfusion group from January 2020 to December 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University. t tests and χ2 tests were used to analyze the difference between the two groups of the clinical characteristics, pathological features, perioperative parameters, and carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the peritoneal lavage fluid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences in postoperative complications after radical surgery were observed between the two groups. No statistically significant differences in peripheral blood indexes were observed between the two groups before surgery or on the first and third days after surgery. One day after radical surgery, the alanine transaminase (54.33 ± 4.93 vs 51.01 ± 5.56) and aspartate transaminase (49.28 ± 4.30 vs 50.99 ± 3.88) in the peripheral blood were higher in the raltitrexed intraperitoneal perfusion group than in the saline intraperitoneal perfusion group. At the same time, no significant difference was found on the third day after surgery. No significant differences in side effects of chemotherapy were observed between the two groups. The positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the raltitrexed intraperitoneal perfusion group (8.47%) was significantly lower than that in the saline intraperitoneal perfusion group (22.81%) after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Raltitrexed perfusion during radical surgery is safe and feasible for elderly patients with CRC and can reduce the positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in peritoneal lavage fluid, so it can be explored as a treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety Study of Raltitrexed Perfusion in Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Effect on CEA mRNA in Peritoneal Lavage Fluid.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Xie, Yuanyuan Wang, Jianguang Jia, Jing Li, Hu Wang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an effective way to kill free tumor cells in the abdominal cavity. The safety and efficacy of raltitrexed perfusion during radical surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with computer-generated random allocation sequences, 116 elderly patients with colorectal cancer who received radical surgery were randomly grouped into the raltitrexed intraperitoneal perfusion group or the saline intraperitoneal perfusion group from January 2020 to December 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University. t tests and χ2 tests were used to analyze the difference between the two groups of the clinical characteristics, pathological features, perioperative parameters, and carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the peritoneal lavage fluid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences in postoperative complications after radical surgery were observed between the two groups. No statistically significant differences in peripheral blood indexes were observed between the two groups before surgery or on the first and third days after surgery. One day after radical surgery, the alanine transaminase (54.33 ± 4.93 vs 51.01 ± 5.56) and aspartate transaminase (49.28 ± 4.30 vs 50.99 ± 3.88) in the peripheral blood were higher in the raltitrexed intraperitoneal perfusion group than in the saline intraperitoneal perfusion group. At the same time, no significant difference was found on the third day after surgery. No significant differences in side effects of chemotherapy were observed between the two groups. The positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the raltitrexed intraperitoneal perfusion group (8.47%) was significantly lower than that in the saline intraperitoneal perfusion group (22.81%) after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Raltitrexed perfusion during radical surgery is safe and feasible for elderly patients with CRC and can reduce the positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in peritoneal lavage fluid, so it can be explored as a treatment option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔内化疗是杀死腹腔内游离肿瘤细胞的有效方法。在老年结直肠癌根治术中灌注雷替曲塞的安全性和有效性尚不明确:2020年1月至2021年12月,在蚌埠医学院第一附属医院接受根治性手术的116例老年结直肠癌患者,按照计算机生成的随机分配序列,随机分为雷替曲塞腹腔灌注组和生理盐水腹腔灌注组。采用t检验和χ2检验分析两组患者的临床特征、病理特征、围手术期指标以及腹腔灌洗液中癌胚抗原mRNA的差异:两组根治术后并发症的差异无统计学意义。两组患者在术前、术后第 1 天和第 3 天的外周血指标差异无统计学意义。根治术后一天,雷替曲塞腹腔灌注组外周血中的丙氨酸转氨酶(54.33 ± 4.93 vs 51.01 ± 5.56)和天冬氨酸转氨酶(49.28 ± 4.30 vs 50.99 ± 3.88)高于生理盐水腹腔灌注组。同时,术后第三天无明显差异。两组化疗副作用无明显差异。雷替曲塞腹腔灌注组术后癌胚抗原 mRNA 阳性率(8.47%)明显低于生理盐水腹腔灌注组(22.81%):结论:对老年 CRC 患者而言,在根治术中灌注雷替曲塞是安全可行的,且可降低腹腔灌洗液中癌胚抗原 mRNA 的阳性率,因此可将其作为一种治疗方案进行探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety Study of Raltitrexed Perfusion in Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Effect on CEA mRNA in Peritoneal Lavage Fluid.

Background: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an effective way to kill free tumor cells in the abdominal cavity. The safety and efficacy of raltitrexed perfusion during radical surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer are still unclear.

Methods: In accordance with computer-generated random allocation sequences, 116 elderly patients with colorectal cancer who received radical surgery were randomly grouped into the raltitrexed intraperitoneal perfusion group or the saline intraperitoneal perfusion group from January 2020 to December 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University. t tests and χ2 tests were used to analyze the difference between the two groups of the clinical characteristics, pathological features, perioperative parameters, and carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the peritoneal lavage fluid.

Results: No statistically significant differences in postoperative complications after radical surgery were observed between the two groups. No statistically significant differences in peripheral blood indexes were observed between the two groups before surgery or on the first and third days after surgery. One day after radical surgery, the alanine transaminase (54.33 ± 4.93 vs 51.01 ± 5.56) and aspartate transaminase (49.28 ± 4.30 vs 50.99 ± 3.88) in the peripheral blood were higher in the raltitrexed intraperitoneal perfusion group than in the saline intraperitoneal perfusion group. At the same time, no significant difference was found on the third day after surgery. No significant differences in side effects of chemotherapy were observed between the two groups. The positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in the raltitrexed intraperitoneal perfusion group (8.47%) was significantly lower than that in the saline intraperitoneal perfusion group (22.81%) after surgery.

Conclusion: Raltitrexed perfusion during radical surgery is safe and feasible for elderly patients with CRC and can reduce the positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA in peritoneal lavage fluid, so it can be explored as a treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信