{"title":"了解职业治疗师在评估空间疏忽时的知识和信心:特刊回顾。","authors":"Holden Gasque, Corey Morrow, Emily Grattan, Michelle Woodbury","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Spatial neglect (SN)-failure to respond to stimuli on the side of the body contralateral to a poststroke lesion-is one of the most disabling impairments for stroke survivors, and 80% of stroke survivors may have undetected SN. Occupational therapists' evaluations should include determining the impact of poststroke SN.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate occupational therapists' confidence, knowledge, current practices, barriers, and facilitators when assessing for SN in adult stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A 30-item survey was created with guidance from stroke rehabilitation occupational therapists who reviewed the survey for face and content validity.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Occupational therapist survey responders (N = 76).</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Self-report assessments were used to measure occupational therapists' confidence in identifying SN, SN assessment practices, and barriers to and facilitators of SN assessment. Knowledge of SN signs and symptoms, neuroanatomy, and clinical presentation were measured with a three-question quiz.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one percent of the respondents reported a high level of confidence in identifying SN, and 70% reported routinely assessing for SN, with 81% using clinical observation rather than standardized tools as the primary assessment method. Barriers to SN assessment included time and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Most respondents, despite reporting high levels of confidence with routine SN assessments, did not use standardized SN measures and demonstrated suboptimal knowledge of SN. These results emphasize the need to increase clinical education about SN and its assessments. Plain-Language Summary: This study gathered baseline information on an underinvestigated topic-occupational therapists' education, confidence, current practices, barriers, and facilitators when assessing for spatial neglect in adult stroke survivors. The study results also contribute to future research on occupational therapists' current confidence and knowledge when assessing for spatial neglect.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"78 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Occupational Therapists' Knowledge and Confidence When Assessing for Spatial Neglect: A Special Issue Review.\",\"authors\":\"Holden Gasque, Corey Morrow, Emily Grattan, Michelle Woodbury\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2024.050354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Spatial neglect (SN)-failure to respond to stimuli on the side of the body contralateral to a poststroke lesion-is one of the most disabling impairments for stroke survivors, and 80% of stroke survivors may have undetected SN. Occupational therapists' evaluations should include determining the impact of poststroke SN.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate occupational therapists' confidence, knowledge, current practices, barriers, and facilitators when assessing for SN in adult stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A 30-item survey was created with guidance from stroke rehabilitation occupational therapists who reviewed the survey for face and content validity.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Occupational therapist survey responders (N = 76).</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Self-report assessments were used to measure occupational therapists' confidence in identifying SN, SN assessment practices, and barriers to and facilitators of SN assessment. Knowledge of SN signs and symptoms, neuroanatomy, and clinical presentation were measured with a three-question quiz.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one percent of the respondents reported a high level of confidence in identifying SN, and 70% reported routinely assessing for SN, with 81% using clinical observation rather than standardized tools as the primary assessment method. Barriers to SN assessment included time and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Most respondents, despite reporting high levels of confidence with routine SN assessments, did not use standardized SN measures and demonstrated suboptimal knowledge of SN. These results emphasize the need to increase clinical education about SN and its assessments. Plain-Language Summary: This study gathered baseline information on an underinvestigated topic-occupational therapists' education, confidence, current practices, barriers, and facilitators when assessing for spatial neglect in adult stroke survivors. The study results also contribute to future research on occupational therapists' current confidence and knowledge when assessing for spatial neglect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050354\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
重要性:空间忽略(SN)--对脑卒中后病变对侧身体的刺激没有反应--是脑卒中幸存者致残率最高的损伤之一,80% 的脑卒中幸存者可能有未被发现的空间忽略。职业治疗师的评估应包括确定卒中后SN的影响:调查职业治疗师在评估成年中风幸存者 SN 时的信心、知识、当前实践、障碍和促进因素:设计:在中风康复职业治疗师的指导下制作了一份包含 30 个项目的调查表,职业治疗师对调查表的表面和内容有效性进行了审核:在线调查:结果和测量:自我报告评估用于衡量职业治疗师在识别SN、SN评估实践以及SN评估的障碍和促进因素方面的信心。通过三个问题的问答来测量职业治疗师对SN体征和症状、神经解剖学和临床表现的了解程度:81%的受访者表示对识别SN很有信心,70%的受访者表示会对SN进行常规评估,81%的受访者将临床观察而非标准化工具作为主要评估方法。评估 SN 的障碍包括时间和资源:尽管大多数受访者表示对常规 SN 评估有很高的信心,但他们并没有使用标准化的 SN 测量方法,对 SN 的了解也不够深入。这些结果表明,有必要加强有关 SN 及其评估的临床教育。通俗摘要:本研究收集了一个未充分研究的课题的基线信息--职业治疗师在评估成年中风幸存者空间疏忽时的教育、信心、当前实践、障碍和促进因素。研究结果还有助于今后对职业治疗师在评估空间忽略时的信心和知识进行研究。
Understanding Occupational Therapists' Knowledge and Confidence When Assessing for Spatial Neglect: A Special Issue Review.
Importance: Spatial neglect (SN)-failure to respond to stimuli on the side of the body contralateral to a poststroke lesion-is one of the most disabling impairments for stroke survivors, and 80% of stroke survivors may have undetected SN. Occupational therapists' evaluations should include determining the impact of poststroke SN.
Objective: To investigate occupational therapists' confidence, knowledge, current practices, barriers, and facilitators when assessing for SN in adult stroke survivors.
Design: A 30-item survey was created with guidance from stroke rehabilitation occupational therapists who reviewed the survey for face and content validity.
Outcomes and measures: Self-report assessments were used to measure occupational therapists' confidence in identifying SN, SN assessment practices, and barriers to and facilitators of SN assessment. Knowledge of SN signs and symptoms, neuroanatomy, and clinical presentation were measured with a three-question quiz.
Results: Eighty-one percent of the respondents reported a high level of confidence in identifying SN, and 70% reported routinely assessing for SN, with 81% using clinical observation rather than standardized tools as the primary assessment method. Barriers to SN assessment included time and resources.
Conclusions and relevance: Most respondents, despite reporting high levels of confidence with routine SN assessments, did not use standardized SN measures and demonstrated suboptimal knowledge of SN. These results emphasize the need to increase clinical education about SN and its assessments. Plain-Language Summary: This study gathered baseline information on an underinvestigated topic-occupational therapists' education, confidence, current practices, barriers, and facilitators when assessing for spatial neglect in adult stroke survivors. The study results also contribute to future research on occupational therapists' current confidence and knowledge when assessing for spatial neglect.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.