Greta Macorig , Arielle Crespel , Annacarmen Nilo , Ngoc Phuong Loc Tang , Gian Luigi Gigli , Philippe Gélisse
{"title":"癫痫会影响正常脑电图变异吗?癫痫患者与非癫痫患者的比较研究","authors":"Greta Macorig , Arielle Crespel , Annacarmen Nilo , Ngoc Phuong Loc Tang , Gian Luigi Gigli , Philippe Gélisse","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the prevalence of benign EEG variants (BEVs) between epileptic and non-epileptic subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, observational EEG study of 1,163 consecutive patients, using the 10–20 international system with systematically two additional anterior/inferior temporal electrodes. The video-EEG monitoring duration was between 24 h and eight days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 917 (78.9%) epileptic patients (mean age: 33.42 ± 15.5 years; females: 53.4%) and 246 (21.2%) non-epileptic patients (mean age: 35.6 ± 18.75 years; females: 54.9%). Despite a shorter mean duration of the EEG recordings, the prevalence of BEVs was higher in non-epileptic vs. epileptic patients (73.2% vs. 57.8%, <em>p</em> = 0.000011). This statistical difference was confirmed for lambda waves (23.6% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 14.8% in the epilepsy group, <em>p</em> = 0.001), POSTs (50.8% vs. 32.5%, <em>p</em> < 0.000001), wicket spikes (20.3% vs. 13.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.009) in particular in NREM and REM sleep, and 14- and 6-Hz positive bursts (13% vs. 7.1% <em>p</em> = 0.003). Mu rhythm was observed at the same frequency in both groups (21.1% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 22.7% in the epilepsy group). There was no difference between the two groups for rarer rhythms, such as rhythmic mid-temporal theta burst of drowsiness, small sharp spikes, and midline theta rhythm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There was no increase in any of the BEVs in the epilepsy group. On the contrary, BEVs were more frequent and diversified in the non-epilepsy group. Epilepsy may negatively affect the occurrence of the most common BEVs, with the exception of the mu rhythm, which is present in about one-fifth of the population with or without epilepsy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 102935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705323000928/pdfft?md5=c2d64820738e2040286d91b616a0da68&pid=1-s2.0-S0987705323000928-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can epilepsy affect normal EEG variants? A comparative study between subjects with and without epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"Greta Macorig , Arielle Crespel , Annacarmen Nilo , Ngoc Phuong Loc Tang , Gian Luigi Gigli , Philippe Gélisse\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the prevalence of benign EEG variants (BEVs) between epileptic and non-epileptic subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, observational EEG study of 1,163 consecutive patients, using the 10–20 international system with systematically two additional anterior/inferior temporal electrodes. The video-EEG monitoring duration was between 24 h and eight days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 917 (78.9%) epileptic patients (mean age: 33.42 ± 15.5 years; females: 53.4%) and 246 (21.2%) non-epileptic patients (mean age: 35.6 ± 18.75 years; females: 54.9%). Despite a shorter mean duration of the EEG recordings, the prevalence of BEVs was higher in non-epileptic vs. epileptic patients (73.2% vs. 57.8%, <em>p</em> = 0.000011). This statistical difference was confirmed for lambda waves (23.6% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 14.8% in the epilepsy group, <em>p</em> = 0.001), POSTs (50.8% vs. 32.5%, <em>p</em> < 0.000001), wicket spikes (20.3% vs. 13.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.009) in particular in NREM and REM sleep, and 14- and 6-Hz positive bursts (13% vs. 7.1% <em>p</em> = 0.003). Mu rhythm was observed at the same frequency in both groups (21.1% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 22.7% in the epilepsy group). There was no difference between the two groups for rarer rhythms, such as rhythmic mid-temporal theta burst of drowsiness, small sharp spikes, and midline theta rhythm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There was no increase in any of the BEVs in the epilepsy group. On the contrary, BEVs were more frequent and diversified in the non-epilepsy group. Epilepsy may negatively affect the occurrence of the most common BEVs, with the exception of the mu rhythm, which is present in about one-fifth of the population with or without epilepsy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 102935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705323000928/pdfft?md5=c2d64820738e2040286d91b616a0da68&pid=1-s2.0-S0987705323000928-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705323000928\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705323000928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can epilepsy affect normal EEG variants? A comparative study between subjects with and without epilepsy
Objectives
To compare the prevalence of benign EEG variants (BEVs) between epileptic and non-epileptic subjects.
Methods
A prospective, observational EEG study of 1,163 consecutive patients, using the 10–20 international system with systematically two additional anterior/inferior temporal electrodes. The video-EEG monitoring duration was between 24 h and eight days.
Results
We identified 917 (78.9%) epileptic patients (mean age: 33.42 ± 15.5 years; females: 53.4%) and 246 (21.2%) non-epileptic patients (mean age: 35.6 ± 18.75 years; females: 54.9%). Despite a shorter mean duration of the EEG recordings, the prevalence of BEVs was higher in non-epileptic vs. epileptic patients (73.2% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.000011). This statistical difference was confirmed for lambda waves (23.6% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 14.8% in the epilepsy group, p = 0.001), POSTs (50.8% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.000001), wicket spikes (20.3% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.009) in particular in NREM and REM sleep, and 14- and 6-Hz positive bursts (13% vs. 7.1% p = 0.003). Mu rhythm was observed at the same frequency in both groups (21.1% in the non-epilepsy group vs. 22.7% in the epilepsy group). There was no difference between the two groups for rarer rhythms, such as rhythmic mid-temporal theta burst of drowsiness, small sharp spikes, and midline theta rhythm.
Conclusions
There was no increase in any of the BEVs in the epilepsy group. On the contrary, BEVs were more frequent and diversified in the non-epilepsy group. Epilepsy may negatively affect the occurrence of the most common BEVs, with the exception of the mu rhythm, which is present in about one-fifth of the population with or without epilepsy.
期刊介绍:
Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.