{"title":"理论建模与机器学习方法的结合:团队合作对个人努力支出的影响案例","authors":"Simon Eisbach , Oliver Mai , Guido Hertel","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Machine learning modelling of psychological processes is often considered as competing alternative to theoretical modelling. In contrast, the current study explores potential synergetic effects of these two general approaches both for predictive accuracy and theoretical understanding. Theoretical models have high explanatory value but can have weak predictive power. Machine learning models have high predictive power but low transparency and require large amounts of data and computational power. The combination of machine learning and theoretical models may yield both higher predictive accuracy as well as higher explanatory value and lower requirements of data and computational power as compared to either of the two approaches alone. We examine our assumptions in the field of team motivation, using archival performance data from 1,425,926 individual and relay races of swimming competitions. While the results revealed better prediction of the machine learning model, an exploration of the machine learning model with explainable artificial intelligence methods offered new insights also for the theoretical model. Finally, the combination of machine learning and theoretical modelling required less computational power than the machine learning approach alone, but not less data for building the model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 101077"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000059/pdfft?md5=907ddafb617c621310f557901c81a4b4&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000059-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining theoretical modelling and machine learning approaches: The case of teamwork effects on individual effort expenditure\",\"authors\":\"Simon Eisbach , Oliver Mai , Guido Hertel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Machine learning modelling of psychological processes is often considered as competing alternative to theoretical modelling. In contrast, the current study explores potential synergetic effects of these two general approaches both for predictive accuracy and theoretical understanding. Theoretical models have high explanatory value but can have weak predictive power. Machine learning models have high predictive power but low transparency and require large amounts of data and computational power. The combination of machine learning and theoretical models may yield both higher predictive accuracy as well as higher explanatory value and lower requirements of data and computational power as compared to either of the two approaches alone. We examine our assumptions in the field of team motivation, using archival performance data from 1,425,926 individual and relay races of swimming competitions. While the results revealed better prediction of the machine learning model, an exploration of the machine learning model with explainable artificial intelligence methods offered new insights also for the theoretical model. Finally, the combination of machine learning and theoretical modelling required less computational power than the machine learning approach alone, but not less data for building the model.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000059/pdfft?md5=907ddafb617c621310f557901c81a4b4&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000059-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000059\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combining theoretical modelling and machine learning approaches: The case of teamwork effects on individual effort expenditure
Machine learning modelling of psychological processes is often considered as competing alternative to theoretical modelling. In contrast, the current study explores potential synergetic effects of these two general approaches both for predictive accuracy and theoretical understanding. Theoretical models have high explanatory value but can have weak predictive power. Machine learning models have high predictive power but low transparency and require large amounts of data and computational power. The combination of machine learning and theoretical models may yield both higher predictive accuracy as well as higher explanatory value and lower requirements of data and computational power as compared to either of the two approaches alone. We examine our assumptions in the field of team motivation, using archival performance data from 1,425,926 individual and relay races of swimming competitions. While the results revealed better prediction of the machine learning model, an exploration of the machine learning model with explainable artificial intelligence methods offered new insights also for the theoretical model. Finally, the combination of machine learning and theoretical modelling required less computational power than the machine learning approach alone, but not less data for building the model.
期刊介绍:
New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.