理论建模与机器学习方法的结合:团队合作对个人努力支出的影响案例

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Simon Eisbach , Oliver Mai , Guido Hertel
{"title":"理论建模与机器学习方法的结合:团队合作对个人努力支出的影响案例","authors":"Simon Eisbach ,&nbsp;Oliver Mai ,&nbsp;Guido Hertel","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Machine learning modelling of psychological processes is often considered as competing alternative to theoretical modelling. In contrast, the current study explores potential synergetic effects of these two general approaches both for predictive accuracy and theoretical understanding. Theoretical models have high explanatory value but can have weak predictive power. Machine learning models have high predictive power but low transparency and require large amounts of data and computational power. The combination of machine learning and theoretical models may yield both higher predictive accuracy as well as higher explanatory value and lower requirements of data and computational power as compared to either of the two approaches alone. We examine our assumptions in the field of team motivation, using archival performance data from 1,425,926 individual and relay races of swimming competitions. While the results revealed better prediction of the machine learning model, an exploration of the machine learning model with explainable artificial intelligence methods offered new insights also for the theoretical model. Finally, the combination of machine learning and theoretical modelling required less computational power than the machine learning approach alone, but not less data for building the model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 101077"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000059/pdfft?md5=907ddafb617c621310f557901c81a4b4&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000059-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining theoretical modelling and machine learning approaches: The case of teamwork effects on individual effort expenditure\",\"authors\":\"Simon Eisbach ,&nbsp;Oliver Mai ,&nbsp;Guido Hertel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Machine learning modelling of psychological processes is often considered as competing alternative to theoretical modelling. In contrast, the current study explores potential synergetic effects of these two general approaches both for predictive accuracy and theoretical understanding. Theoretical models have high explanatory value but can have weak predictive power. Machine learning models have high predictive power but low transparency and require large amounts of data and computational power. The combination of machine learning and theoretical models may yield both higher predictive accuracy as well as higher explanatory value and lower requirements of data and computational power as compared to either of the two approaches alone. We examine our assumptions in the field of team motivation, using archival performance data from 1,425,926 individual and relay races of swimming competitions. While the results revealed better prediction of the machine learning model, an exploration of the machine learning model with explainable artificial intelligence methods offered new insights also for the theoretical model. Finally, the combination of machine learning and theoretical modelling required less computational power than the machine learning approach alone, but not less data for building the model.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000059/pdfft?md5=907ddafb617c621310f557901c81a4b4&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000059-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Ideas in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000059\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理过程的机器学习建模通常被认为是理论建模的竞争性替代方案。相比之下,本研究探讨了这两种通用方法在预测准确性和理论理解方面的潜在协同效应。理论模型具有很高的解释价值,但预测能力较弱。机器学习模型预测能力强,但透明度低,需要大量数据和计算能力。机器学习模型和理论模型的结合可能会产生更高的预测准确性以及更高的解释价值,而且对数据和计算能力的要求比单独使用这两种方法中的任何一种都要低。我们利用 1,425,926 场游泳比赛的个人和接力赛的档案数据,在团队激励领域检验了我们的假设。结果表明,机器学习模型的预测效果更好,而利用可解释人工智能方法对机器学习模型进行的探索也为理论模型提供了新的见解。最后,机器学习与理论建模相结合所需的计算能力低于单独使用机器学习方法,但用于建立模型的数据却没有减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining theoretical modelling and machine learning approaches: The case of teamwork effects on individual effort expenditure

Machine learning modelling of psychological processes is often considered as competing alternative to theoretical modelling. In contrast, the current study explores potential synergetic effects of these two general approaches both for predictive accuracy and theoretical understanding. Theoretical models have high explanatory value but can have weak predictive power. Machine learning models have high predictive power but low transparency and require large amounts of data and computational power. The combination of machine learning and theoretical models may yield both higher predictive accuracy as well as higher explanatory value and lower requirements of data and computational power as compared to either of the two approaches alone. We examine our assumptions in the field of team motivation, using archival performance data from 1,425,926 individual and relay races of swimming competitions. While the results revealed better prediction of the machine learning model, an exploration of the machine learning model with explainable artificial intelligence methods offered new insights also for the theoretical model. Finally, the combination of machine learning and theoretical modelling required less computational power than the machine learning approach alone, but not less data for building the model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信