利用人工气味优化宿主诱饵诱捕器对疟疾病媒的吸引力。

Romaric Akoton, Simon P Sawadogo, Eric Tossou, Achille S Nikiema, Genevieve Tchigossou, Pierre M Sovegnon, Luc Djogbenou, Francis Zeukeng, Frances M Hawkes, Rock K Dabire, Rousseau Djouaka, Gabriella Gibson
{"title":"利用人工气味优化宿主诱饵诱捕器对疟疾病媒的吸引力。","authors":"Romaric Akoton, Simon P Sawadogo, Eric Tossou, Achille S Nikiema, Genevieve Tchigossou, Pierre M Sovegnon, Luc Djogbenou, Francis Zeukeng, Frances M Hawkes, Rock K Dabire, Rousseau Djouaka, Gabriella Gibson","doi":"10.1093/jme/tjae010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malaria vector surveillance tools often incorporate features of hosts that are attractive to blood-seeking females. The recently developed host decoy trap (HDT) combines visual, thermal, and olfactory stimuli associated with human hosts and has shown great efficacy in terms of collecting malaria vectors. Synthetic odors and yeast-produced carbon dioxide (CO2) could prove useful by mimicking the human odors currently used in HDTs and provide standardized and easy-to-use olfactory attractants. The objective of this study was to test the attractiveness of various olfactory attractant cues in HDTs to capture malaria vectors. We compared 4 different odor treatments in outdoor field settings in southern Benin and western Burkina Faso: the standard HDT using a human, HDT with yeast-produced CO2, HDT with an artificial odor blend, and HDT with yeast-produced CO2 plus artificial odor blend. In both experimental sites, the standard HDT that incorporated a real human produced the greatest catch of Anopheles gambiae s.l (Diptera: Culicidae). The alternatives tested were still effective at collecting target vector species, although the most effective included CO2, either alone (Benin) or in combination with synthetic odor (Burkina Faso). The trap using synthetic human odor alone caught the fewest An. gambiae s.l. compared to the other baited traps. Both Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae were caught by each trap, with a predominance of An. coluzzii. Synthetic baits could, therefore, represent a more standardized and easier-to-deploy approach than using real human odor baits for a robust vector monitoring strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical entomology","volume":" ","pages":"808-814"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using artificial odors to optimize attractiveness of host decoy traps to malaria vectors.\",\"authors\":\"Romaric Akoton, Simon P Sawadogo, Eric Tossou, Achille S Nikiema, Genevieve Tchigossou, Pierre M Sovegnon, Luc Djogbenou, Francis Zeukeng, Frances M Hawkes, Rock K Dabire, Rousseau Djouaka, Gabriella Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jme/tjae010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Malaria vector surveillance tools often incorporate features of hosts that are attractive to blood-seeking females. The recently developed host decoy trap (HDT) combines visual, thermal, and olfactory stimuli associated with human hosts and has shown great efficacy in terms of collecting malaria vectors. Synthetic odors and yeast-produced carbon dioxide (CO2) could prove useful by mimicking the human odors currently used in HDTs and provide standardized and easy-to-use olfactory attractants. The objective of this study was to test the attractiveness of various olfactory attractant cues in HDTs to capture malaria vectors. We compared 4 different odor treatments in outdoor field settings in southern Benin and western Burkina Faso: the standard HDT using a human, HDT with yeast-produced CO2, HDT with an artificial odor blend, and HDT with yeast-produced CO2 plus artificial odor blend. In both experimental sites, the standard HDT that incorporated a real human produced the greatest catch of Anopheles gambiae s.l (Diptera: Culicidae). The alternatives tested were still effective at collecting target vector species, although the most effective included CO2, either alone (Benin) or in combination with synthetic odor (Burkina Faso). The trap using synthetic human odor alone caught the fewest An. gambiae s.l. compared to the other baited traps. Both Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae were caught by each trap, with a predominance of An. coluzzii. Synthetic baits could, therefore, represent a more standardized and easier-to-deploy approach than using real human odor baits for a robust vector monitoring strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical entomology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"808-814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjae010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjae010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疟疾病媒监测工具通常结合了宿主的特征,这些特征对觅血的雌性病媒具有吸引力。最近开发的宿主诱饵诱捕器(HDT)结合了与人类宿主相关的视觉、热和嗅觉刺激,在收集疟疾病媒方面显示出巨大的功效。合成气味和酵母产生的二氧化碳(CO2)可以模仿目前在 HDT 中使用的人类气味,并提供标准化和易于使用的嗅觉引诱剂。本研究的目的是测试人类驱赶蚊虫器中各种嗅觉引诱剂对捕捉疟疾病媒的吸引力。我们在贝宁南部和布基纳法索西部的户外野外环境中比较了 4 种不同的气味处理方法:使用人的标准 HDT、使用酵母产生的二氧化碳的 HDT、使用人工气味混合物的 HDT 和使用酵母产生的二氧化碳加人工气味混合物的 HDT。在这两个实验点,使用真人的标准 HDT 捕获的冈比亚按蚊(双翅目:疟蚊科)最多。所测试的替代品在收集目标病媒物种方面仍然有效,但最有效的是二氧化碳,无论是单独使用(贝宁)还是与合成气味结合使用(布基纳法索)。与其他诱饵诱捕器相比,单独使用合成人味的诱捕器捕获的冈比亚疟蚊数量最少。每种诱捕器都能捕捉到大肠疟蚊和冈比亚疟蚊,其中以大肠疟蚊为主。因此,与使用真正的人味诱饵相比,合成诱饵可能是一种更标准化和更易于部署的方法,可用于强有力的病媒监测战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using artificial odors to optimize attractiveness of host decoy traps to malaria vectors.

Malaria vector surveillance tools often incorporate features of hosts that are attractive to blood-seeking females. The recently developed host decoy trap (HDT) combines visual, thermal, and olfactory stimuli associated with human hosts and has shown great efficacy in terms of collecting malaria vectors. Synthetic odors and yeast-produced carbon dioxide (CO2) could prove useful by mimicking the human odors currently used in HDTs and provide standardized and easy-to-use olfactory attractants. The objective of this study was to test the attractiveness of various olfactory attractant cues in HDTs to capture malaria vectors. We compared 4 different odor treatments in outdoor field settings in southern Benin and western Burkina Faso: the standard HDT using a human, HDT with yeast-produced CO2, HDT with an artificial odor blend, and HDT with yeast-produced CO2 plus artificial odor blend. In both experimental sites, the standard HDT that incorporated a real human produced the greatest catch of Anopheles gambiae s.l (Diptera: Culicidae). The alternatives tested were still effective at collecting target vector species, although the most effective included CO2, either alone (Benin) or in combination with synthetic odor (Burkina Faso). The trap using synthetic human odor alone caught the fewest An. gambiae s.l. compared to the other baited traps. Both Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae were caught by each trap, with a predominance of An. coluzzii. Synthetic baits could, therefore, represent a more standardized and easier-to-deploy approach than using real human odor baits for a robust vector monitoring strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信