让我们齐心协力!为饮食失调症的临床试验制定一套核心结果。

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Anna Victoria Brieva-Toloza, Oliver Rumle Hovmand, Nadia Micali, Anne Bryde Christensen
{"title":"让我们齐心协力!为饮食失调症的临床试验制定一套核心结果。","authors":"Anna Victoria Brieva-Toloza,&nbsp;Oliver Rumle Hovmand,&nbsp;Nadia Micali,&nbsp;Anne Bryde Christensen","doi":"10.1002/erv.3079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Our study aimed to review the outcome measures/assessment instruments used and to assess their heterogeneity/homogeneity in eating disorders (EDs) randomised controlled trials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>APA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Embase were searched in December 2022 to identify studies published between and inclusive of January 2012 and December 2022. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (1) complete articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which were: (2) randomised trials, (3) in a clinical setting (4) with human subjects, (5) with an ICD or DSM diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, or Bulimia Nervosa. The selected papers also: (6) used one or more standardised instruments designed to measure one or more psychometric characteristics associated with ED as a primary or secondary outcome, as judged by the authors of this systematic review, and (7) were published in English or Danish.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety one articles were included, and a total of 196 outcome measures were collected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The diversity of outcome measures in ED trials hampers result comparability and data integration. We suggest creating a core outcome measure set using the Delphi method, including clinician and patient-reported ED assessments, along with relevant comorbidity scales.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":"32 4","pages":"652-661"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/erv.3079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let's get aligned! Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in eating disorders\",\"authors\":\"Anna Victoria Brieva-Toloza,&nbsp;Oliver Rumle Hovmand,&nbsp;Nadia Micali,&nbsp;Anne Bryde Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/erv.3079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study aimed to review the outcome measures/assessment instruments used and to assess their heterogeneity/homogeneity in eating disorders (EDs) randomised controlled trials.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>APA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Embase were searched in December 2022 to identify studies published between and inclusive of January 2012 and December 2022. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (1) complete articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which were: (2) randomised trials, (3) in a clinical setting (4) with human subjects, (5) with an ICD or DSM diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, or Bulimia Nervosa. The selected papers also: (6) used one or more standardised instruments designed to measure one or more psychometric characteristics associated with ED as a primary or secondary outcome, as judged by the authors of this systematic review, and (7) were published in English or Danish.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ninety one articles were included, and a total of 196 outcome measures were collected.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The diversity of outcome measures in ED trials hampers result comparability and data integration. We suggest creating a core outcome measure set using the Delphi method, including clinician and patient-reported ED assessments, along with relevant comorbidity scales.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Eating Disorders Review\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"652-661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/erv.3079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Eating Disorders Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的研究旨在回顾进食障碍随机对照试验中使用的结果测量/评估工具,并评估其异质性/同质性:我们的研究旨在回顾进食障碍(EDs)随机对照试验中使用的结果测量/评估工具,并评估其异质性/同质性:在 2022 年 12 月对 APA PsycInfo、PubMed 和 Embase 进行了检索,以确定 2012 年 1 月(含)至 2022 年 12 月间发表的研究。纳入/排除标准为(1) 在同行评议的科学期刊上发表的完整文章,这些文章必须是:(1) 随机试验;(2) 在同行评议的科学期刊上发表的完整文章:(2) 随机试验,(3) 临床环境,(4) 以人为对象,(5) 经 ICD 或 DSM 诊断为神经性厌食症、暴饮暴食症或神经性贪食症。被选中的论文还包括:(6) 使用了一种或多种标准化工具来测量与 ED 相关的一种或多种心理测量特征,作为本系统综述作者判断的主要或次要结果;(7) 以英语或丹麦语发表:结果:共纳入 91 篇文章,收集了 196 项结果测量指标:讨论:急诊室试验中结果测量的多样性阻碍了结果的可比性和数据整合。我们建议使用德尔菲法建立一套核心结果测量方法,包括临床医生和患者报告的急诊室评估以及相关的合并症量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Let's get aligned! Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in eating disorders

Let's get aligned! Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in eating disorders

Objective

Our study aimed to review the outcome measures/assessment instruments used and to assess their heterogeneity/homogeneity in eating disorders (EDs) randomised controlled trials.

Methods

APA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Embase were searched in December 2022 to identify studies published between and inclusive of January 2012 and December 2022. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (1) complete articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which were: (2) randomised trials, (3) in a clinical setting (4) with human subjects, (5) with an ICD or DSM diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, or Bulimia Nervosa. The selected papers also: (6) used one or more standardised instruments designed to measure one or more psychometric characteristics associated with ED as a primary or secondary outcome, as judged by the authors of this systematic review, and (7) were published in English or Danish.

Results

Ninety one articles were included, and a total of 196 outcome measures were collected.

Discussion

The diversity of outcome measures in ED trials hampers result comparability and data integration. We suggest creating a core outcome measure set using the Delphi method, including clinician and patient-reported ED assessments, along with relevant comorbidity scales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信