减数分裂纺锤体视图可改善反应不佳者的试管婴儿结果:印度尼西亚一家试管婴儿中心的回顾性分析研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Binarwan Halim, Hilma Putri Lubis, Ichwanul Adenin, Jesselyn Angellee, Rizky Senna Samoedra
{"title":"减数分裂纺锤体视图可改善反应不佳者的试管婴儿结果:印度尼西亚一家试管婴儿中心的回顾性分析研究。","authors":"Binarwan Halim, Hilma Putri Lubis, Ichwanul Adenin, Jesselyn Angellee, Rizky Senna Samoedra","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous studies have shown that the meiotic spindle is not always aligned with the first polar body (PB) in metaphase II human oocytes. Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) has been used to observe and locate the meiotic spindle to avoid disrupting it while injecting oocytes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between meiotic spindle view and IVF-ICSI outcomes in poor responder women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analytical study, carried out from January to November 2019; involving 115 poor responder women who underwent IVF-ICSI cycles at the Halim Fertility Center, Indonesia. The patients were divided into two groups: group I without meiotic spindle viewing (non-MSV) as control group, and group II with meiotic spindle viewing (MSV) as the case group. The meiotic spindles were imaged before ICSI with Oosight microscopy. Baseline characteristics and IVF-ICSI outcomes of both groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 115 poor responder women with non-MSV group (71 women), and an MSV group (44 women). The results showed that there was no significant difference in the fertilization rate between the two groups (p>0.05), but the embryo cleavage rate was higher in the MSV group when compared to the non-MSV group; and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). The fertilization rate was higher in aligned than misaligned spindle and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). Good quality embryo was higher in MSV group than non-MSV group (59.05% vs. 63.95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meiotic spindle view might improve the outcome of IVF in poor responder women.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meiotic Spindle View improves the Outcome of IVF in Poor Responders: A Retrospective Analytical Study from an Indonesian IVF Center.\",\"authors\":\"Binarwan Halim, Hilma Putri Lubis, Ichwanul Adenin, Jesselyn Angellee, Rizky Senna Samoedra\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20240006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous studies have shown that the meiotic spindle is not always aligned with the first polar body (PB) in metaphase II human oocytes. Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) has been used to observe and locate the meiotic spindle to avoid disrupting it while injecting oocytes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between meiotic spindle view and IVF-ICSI outcomes in poor responder women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analytical study, carried out from January to November 2019; involving 115 poor responder women who underwent IVF-ICSI cycles at the Halim Fertility Center, Indonesia. The patients were divided into two groups: group I without meiotic spindle viewing (non-MSV) as control group, and group II with meiotic spindle viewing (MSV) as the case group. The meiotic spindles were imaged before ICSI with Oosight microscopy. Baseline characteristics and IVF-ICSI outcomes of both groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 115 poor responder women with non-MSV group (71 women), and an MSV group (44 women). The results showed that there was no significant difference in the fertilization rate between the two groups (p>0.05), but the embryo cleavage rate was higher in the MSV group when compared to the non-MSV group; and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). The fertilization rate was higher in aligned than misaligned spindle and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). Good quality embryo was higher in MSV group than non-MSV group (59.05% vs. 63.95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meiotic spindle view might improve the outcome of IVF in poor responder women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"39-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的先前的研究表明,人类卵母细胞分裂后期的减数分裂主轴并不总是与第一极体(PB)对齐。偏光显微镜(PLM)被用来观察和定位减数分裂纺锤体,以避免在注射卵母细胞时破坏它。本研究的目的是评估减数分裂纺锤体视图与体外受精-卵细胞计数法(IVF-ICSI)结果之间的关系:本研究是一项回顾性分析研究,于2019年1月至11月进行;涉及115名在印度尼西亚哈利姆生育中心接受IVF-ICSI周期的反应不佳女性。患者被分为两组:未进行减数分裂主轴观察(非MSV)的I组为对照组,进行减数分裂主轴观察(MSV)的II组为病例组。在进行卵胞浆内单精子显微注射前,用 Oosight 显微镜对减数分裂纺锤体进行成像。比较两组的基线特征和 IVF-ICSI 结果:我们的研究包括 115 名反应不佳的女性,其中非 MSV 组(71 名)和 MSV 组(44 名)。结果显示,两组受精率无显著差异(P>0.05),但与非 MSV 组相比,MSV 组的胚胎裂解率较高;且两组之间存在显著差异(P结论:减数分裂纺锤体视图可改善反应不良妇女的体外受精结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meiotic Spindle View improves the Outcome of IVF in Poor Responders: A Retrospective Analytical Study from an Indonesian IVF Center.

Objective: Previous studies have shown that the meiotic spindle is not always aligned with the first polar body (PB) in metaphase II human oocytes. Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) has been used to observe and locate the meiotic spindle to avoid disrupting it while injecting oocytes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between meiotic spindle view and IVF-ICSI outcomes in poor responder women.

Methods: This study was a retrospective analytical study, carried out from January to November 2019; involving 115 poor responder women who underwent IVF-ICSI cycles at the Halim Fertility Center, Indonesia. The patients were divided into two groups: group I without meiotic spindle viewing (non-MSV) as control group, and group II with meiotic spindle viewing (MSV) as the case group. The meiotic spindles were imaged before ICSI with Oosight microscopy. Baseline characteristics and IVF-ICSI outcomes of both groups were compared.

Results: Our study included 115 poor responder women with non-MSV group (71 women), and an MSV group (44 women). The results showed that there was no significant difference in the fertilization rate between the two groups (p>0.05), but the embryo cleavage rate was higher in the MSV group when compared to the non-MSV group; and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). The fertilization rate was higher in aligned than misaligned spindle and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). Good quality embryo was higher in MSV group than non-MSV group (59.05% vs. 63.95%).

Conclusions: Meiotic spindle view might improve the outcome of IVF in poor responder women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信