偏头痛患者坚持生物反馈疗法转诊的相关因素:观察研究。

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mia T. Minen, Alexis George, Ami Z. Cuneo
{"title":"偏头痛患者坚持生物反馈疗法转诊的相关因素:观察研究。","authors":"Mia T. Minen,&nbsp;Alexis George,&nbsp;Ami Z. Cuneo","doi":"10.1007/s10484-024-09622-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biofeedback has Grade A evidence for the treatment of migraine, yet few studies have examined the factors associated with patients’ decisions to pursue biofeedback treatment recommendations. We sought to examine reasons for adherence or non-adherence to referral to biofeedback therapy as treatment for migraine. Patients with migraine who had been referred for biofeedback by a headache specialist/behavioral neurologist were interviewed in person or via Webex. Patients completed an enrollment questionnaire addressing demographics and questions related to their headache histories. At one month, patients were sent a follow-up questionnaire via REDCap and asked if they had pursued the recommendation for biofeedback therapy, their reasons for their decision, and their impressions about biofeedback for those who pursued it. Nearly two-thirds (65%; 33/51) of patients responded at one month. Of these, fewer than half (45%, 15/33) had contacted biofeedback providers, and only 18% (6/33) completed a biofeedback session. Common themes emerged for patients who did not pursue biofeedback, including feeling that they did not have time, concern for financial obstacles (e.g., treatment cost and/or insurance coverage), and having difficulty scheduling an appointment due to limited provider availability. When asked about their preference between type of biofeedback provider (e.g., a physical therapist or psychologist), qualitative responses were mixed; many patients indicated no preference as long as they took insurance and/or were experienced, while others indicated a specific preference for a physical therapist or psychologist due to familiarity, or prior experiences with that kind of provider. Patients with migraine referred for biofeedback therapy face numerous obstacles to pursuing treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","volume":"49 2","pages":"281 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with Patient Adherence to Biofeedback Therapy Referral for Migraine: An Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"Mia T. Minen,&nbsp;Alexis George,&nbsp;Ami Z. Cuneo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10484-024-09622-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Biofeedback has Grade A evidence for the treatment of migraine, yet few studies have examined the factors associated with patients’ decisions to pursue biofeedback treatment recommendations. We sought to examine reasons for adherence or non-adherence to referral to biofeedback therapy as treatment for migraine. Patients with migraine who had been referred for biofeedback by a headache specialist/behavioral neurologist were interviewed in person or via Webex. Patients completed an enrollment questionnaire addressing demographics and questions related to their headache histories. At one month, patients were sent a follow-up questionnaire via REDCap and asked if they had pursued the recommendation for biofeedback therapy, their reasons for their decision, and their impressions about biofeedback for those who pursued it. Nearly two-thirds (65%; 33/51) of patients responded at one month. Of these, fewer than half (45%, 15/33) had contacted biofeedback providers, and only 18% (6/33) completed a biofeedback session. Common themes emerged for patients who did not pursue biofeedback, including feeling that they did not have time, concern for financial obstacles (e.g., treatment cost and/or insurance coverage), and having difficulty scheduling an appointment due to limited provider availability. When asked about their preference between type of biofeedback provider (e.g., a physical therapist or psychologist), qualitative responses were mixed; many patients indicated no preference as long as they took insurance and/or were experienced, while others indicated a specific preference for a physical therapist or psychologist due to familiarity, or prior experiences with that kind of provider. Patients with migraine referred for biofeedback therapy face numerous obstacles to pursuing treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"281 - 289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10484-024-09622-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10484-024-09622-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物反馈疗法在治疗偏头痛方面拥有A级证据,但很少有研究对患者决定接受生物反馈疗法建议的相关因素进行研究。我们试图研究患者坚持或不坚持生物反馈疗法治疗偏头痛的原因。我们对由头痛专科医生/行为神经科医生推荐接受生物反馈治疗的偏头痛患者进行了面谈或通过 Webex 进行了访谈。患者填写了一份注册问卷,其中涉及人口统计学和与头痛病史相关的问题。一个月后,我们通过 REDCap 向患者发送了一份随访问卷,询问他们是否接受了生物反馈疗法的建议、做出该决定的原因,以及接受生物反馈疗法的患者对生物反馈疗法的印象。近三分之二(65%;33/51)的患者在一个月后做出了回复。其中,不到一半(45%,15/33)的患者联系过生物反馈提供者,只有 18%(6/33)的患者完成了生物反馈治疗。没有进行生物反馈治疗的患者有一些共同的想法,包括觉得自己没有时间、担心经济障碍(如治疗费用和/或保险范围),以及由于医疗机构有限而难以预约。当被问及对生物反馈医疗服务提供者(如物理治疗师或心理学家)类型的偏好时,患者的回答不尽相同;许多患者表示,只要有保险和/或有经验,他们就没有偏好,而其他患者则表示,由于对物理治疗师或心理学家比较熟悉,或之前有过与这类医疗服务提供者合作的经历,他们特别偏好这类医疗服务提供者。转诊接受生物反馈疗法的偏头痛患者在接受治疗时面临诸多障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors Associated with Patient Adherence to Biofeedback Therapy Referral for Migraine: An Observational Study

Factors Associated with Patient Adherence to Biofeedback Therapy Referral for Migraine: An Observational Study

Factors Associated with Patient Adherence to Biofeedback Therapy Referral for Migraine: An Observational Study

Biofeedback has Grade A evidence for the treatment of migraine, yet few studies have examined the factors associated with patients’ decisions to pursue biofeedback treatment recommendations. We sought to examine reasons for adherence or non-adherence to referral to biofeedback therapy as treatment for migraine. Patients with migraine who had been referred for biofeedback by a headache specialist/behavioral neurologist were interviewed in person or via Webex. Patients completed an enrollment questionnaire addressing demographics and questions related to their headache histories. At one month, patients were sent a follow-up questionnaire via REDCap and asked if they had pursued the recommendation for biofeedback therapy, their reasons for their decision, and their impressions about biofeedback for those who pursued it. Nearly two-thirds (65%; 33/51) of patients responded at one month. Of these, fewer than half (45%, 15/33) had contacted biofeedback providers, and only 18% (6/33) completed a biofeedback session. Common themes emerged for patients who did not pursue biofeedback, including feeling that they did not have time, concern for financial obstacles (e.g., treatment cost and/or insurance coverage), and having difficulty scheduling an appointment due to limited provider availability. When asked about their preference between type of biofeedback provider (e.g., a physical therapist or psychologist), qualitative responses were mixed; many patients indicated no preference as long as they took insurance and/or were experienced, while others indicated a specific preference for a physical therapist or psychologist due to familiarity, or prior experiences with that kind of provider. Patients with migraine referred for biofeedback therapy face numerous obstacles to pursuing treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is an international, interdisciplinary journal devoted to study of the interrelationship of physiological systems, cognition, social and environmental parameters, and health. Priority is given to original research, basic and applied, which contributes to the theory, practice, and evaluation of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. Submissions are also welcomed for consideration in several additional sections that appear in the journal. They consist of conceptual and theoretical articles; evaluative reviews; the Clinical Forum, which includes separate categories for innovative case studies, clinical replication series, extended treatment protocols, and clinical notes and observations; the Discussion Forum, which includes a series of papers centered around a topic of importance to the field; Innovations in Instrumentation; Letters to the Editor, commenting on issues raised in articles previously published in the journal; and select book reviews. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is the official publication of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信