营养师和营养学学生中的厌食症--患病率、风险因素和干预措施:采用系统方法进行的范围界定综述。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Chloe Ephrem, Rana Rizk, Danielle Saadeh, Souheil Hallit, Sahar Obeid, Carolien Martijn
{"title":"营养师和营养学学生中的厌食症--患病率、风险因素和干预措施:采用系统方法进行的范围界定综述。","authors":"Chloe Ephrem, Rana Rizk, Danielle Saadeh, Souheil Hallit, Sahar Obeid, Carolien Martijn","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is characterized by compulsive behaviors and increased concerns about healthful eating. Dietitians appear to be especially vulnerable to ON, and it is still debatable whether the disordered eating behaviors motivate individuals to enroll in nutrition programs, or whether these behaviors result from an exaggerated preoccupation with healthy eating triggered during their nutrition studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to provide an overview of the present state of knowledge about the prevalence, risk factors, and interventions addressing ON among dietitians and dietetics students. More specifically, it was examined whether dietitians and dietetics students differ from students attending different education programs or other health professionals with regard to the severity and risk factors of ON, and whether the extent of ON changes during the progression in the nutrition education years of study.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), PsycInfo (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane, ProQuest Central, CABI, ProQuest Dissertations, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink were searched on May 8, 2021, and updated on November 12, 2022.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Records were screened for eligibility; study characteristics, methodology, and findings of included articles were extracted; and the methodological quality assessed using the AXIS tool. Each step was preceded by a calibration exercise and conducted independently and in duplicate by pairs of 2 reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved through discussions.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A narrative synthesis was performed, whereby the characteristics, methodologies, and results of included studies were compared.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results were inconclusive; yet, a general status of the relatively \"high\" prevalence of ON among dietitians and dietetics students was established, stressing the need for systematic research to understand and mitigate orthorexic tendencies in this group. It is still too early to answer questions pertaining to prevalence, risk factors, interventions, and differences between dietetics students and other majors when it comes to severity and progress of ON throughout the continuing years of study, or between dietitians and other professional groups.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BY5KF.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":"382-396"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthorexia nervosa in dietitians and dietetics students-prevalence, risk factors, and interventions: a scoping review using a systematic approach.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Ephrem, Rana Rizk, Danielle Saadeh, Souheil Hallit, Sahar Obeid, Carolien Martijn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuae009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is characterized by compulsive behaviors and increased concerns about healthful eating. Dietitians appear to be especially vulnerable to ON, and it is still debatable whether the disordered eating behaviors motivate individuals to enroll in nutrition programs, or whether these behaviors result from an exaggerated preoccupation with healthy eating triggered during their nutrition studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to provide an overview of the present state of knowledge about the prevalence, risk factors, and interventions addressing ON among dietitians and dietetics students. More specifically, it was examined whether dietitians and dietetics students differ from students attending different education programs or other health professionals with regard to the severity and risk factors of ON, and whether the extent of ON changes during the progression in the nutrition education years of study.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), PsycInfo (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane, ProQuest Central, CABI, ProQuest Dissertations, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink were searched on May 8, 2021, and updated on November 12, 2022.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Records were screened for eligibility; study characteristics, methodology, and findings of included articles were extracted; and the methodological quality assessed using the AXIS tool. Each step was preceded by a calibration exercise and conducted independently and in duplicate by pairs of 2 reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved through discussions.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A narrative synthesis was performed, whereby the characteristics, methodologies, and results of included studies were compared.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results were inconclusive; yet, a general status of the relatively \\\"high\\\" prevalence of ON among dietitians and dietetics students was established, stressing the need for systematic research to understand and mitigate orthorexic tendencies in this group. It is still too early to answer questions pertaining to prevalence, risk factors, interventions, and differences between dietetics students and other majors when it comes to severity and progress of ON throughout the continuing years of study, or between dietitians and other professional groups.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BY5KF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"382-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经性厌食症(ON)的特征是强迫行为和对健康饮食的日益关注。营养师似乎特别容易患上 "神经性厌食症",目前仍有争议的是,饮食失调行为是促使个人报名参加营养计划的原因,还是在营养学学习期间对健康饮食的过分关注导致了这些行为:目的:本研究旨在概述有关营养师和营养学学生中ON的流行率、风险因素和干预措施的知识现状。更具体地说,该研究考察了营养师和营养学专业学生与不同教育项目的学生或其他卫生专业人员在 "营养不良 "的严重程度和风险因素方面是否存在差异,以及 "营养不良 "的程度是否会随着营养教育学习年限的增加而发生变化:于2021年5月8日检索了MEDLINE(Ovid)、PubMed、EMBASE(Ovid)、PsycInfo(EBSCO)、CINAHL(EBSCO)、Cochrane、ProQuest Central、CABI、ProQuest Dissertations、Google Scholar、ScienceDirect和SpringerLink,并于2022年11月12日进行了更新:筛选符合条件的记录;提取纳入文章的研究特征、方法和结果;使用 AXIS 工具评估方法学质量。每个步骤之前都要进行校准,并由两名审稿人独立重复进行。数据分析:数据分析:进行了叙述性综合,对纳入研究的特点、方法和结果进行了比较:结论:研究结果尚无定论,但已确定营养师和营养学学生中ON发病率相对 "较高 "的总体状况,强调有必要开展系统性研究,以了解和缓解这一群体的矫形倾向。要回答营养学学生和其他专业学生在整个持续学习年限内ON的严重程度和进展情况,或营养师和其他专业群体之间在ON的流行率、风险因素、干预措施、差异等方面的问题,还为时尚早:系统综述注册:开放科学框架标识符:doi 10.17605/osf.io/by5kf。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orthorexia nervosa in dietitians and dietetics students-prevalence, risk factors, and interventions: a scoping review using a systematic approach.

Context: Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is characterized by compulsive behaviors and increased concerns about healthful eating. Dietitians appear to be especially vulnerable to ON, and it is still debatable whether the disordered eating behaviors motivate individuals to enroll in nutrition programs, or whether these behaviors result from an exaggerated preoccupation with healthy eating triggered during their nutrition studies.

Objective: The aim was to provide an overview of the present state of knowledge about the prevalence, risk factors, and interventions addressing ON among dietitians and dietetics students. More specifically, it was examined whether dietitians and dietetics students differ from students attending different education programs or other health professionals with regard to the severity and risk factors of ON, and whether the extent of ON changes during the progression in the nutrition education years of study.

Data sources: MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), PsycInfo (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane, ProQuest Central, CABI, ProQuest Dissertations, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink were searched on May 8, 2021, and updated on November 12, 2022.

Data extraction: Records were screened for eligibility; study characteristics, methodology, and findings of included articles were extracted; and the methodological quality assessed using the AXIS tool. Each step was preceded by a calibration exercise and conducted independently and in duplicate by pairs of 2 reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved through discussions.

Data analysis: A narrative synthesis was performed, whereby the characteristics, methodologies, and results of included studies were compared.

Conclusions: Results were inconclusive; yet, a general status of the relatively "high" prevalence of ON among dietitians and dietetics students was established, stressing the need for systematic research to understand and mitigate orthorexic tendencies in this group. It is still too early to answer questions pertaining to prevalence, risk factors, interventions, and differences between dietetics students and other majors when it comes to severity and progress of ON throughout the continuing years of study, or between dietitians and other professional groups.

Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BY5KF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信