{"title":"水、质子和电压门控钾通道的门控。","authors":"Alisher M Kariev, Michael E Green","doi":"10.3390/membranes14020037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ion channels are ubiquitous throughout all forms of life. Potassium channels are even found in viruses. Every cell must communicate with its surroundings, so all cells have them, and excitable cells, in particular, especially nerve cells, depend on the behavior of these channels. Every channel must be open at the appropriate time, and only then, so that each channel opens in response to the stimulus that tells that channel to open. One set of channels, including those in nerve cells, responds to voltage. There is a standard model for the gating of these channels that has a section of the protein moving in response to the voltage. However, there is evidence that protons are moving, rather than protein. Water is critical as part of the gating process, although it is hard to see how this works in the standard model. Here, we review the extensive evidence of the importance of the role of water and protons in gating these channels. Our principal example, but by no means the only example, will be the K<sub>v</sub>1.2 channel. Evidence comes from the effects of D<sub>2</sub>O, from mutations in the voltage sensing domain, as well as in the linker between that domain and the gate, and at the gate itself. There is additional evidence from computations, especially quantum calculations. Structural evidence comes from X-ray studies. The hydration of ions is critical in the transfer of ions in constricted spaces, such as the gate region and the pore of a channel; we will see how the structure of the hydrated ion fits with the structure of the channel. In addition, there is macroscopic evidence from osmotic experiments and streaming current measurements. The combined evidence is discussed in the context of a model that emphasizes the role of protons and water in gating these channels.</p>","PeriodicalId":18410,"journal":{"name":"Membranes","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10890431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water, Protons, and the Gating of Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels.\",\"authors\":\"Alisher M Kariev, Michael E Green\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/membranes14020037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ion channels are ubiquitous throughout all forms of life. Potassium channels are even found in viruses. Every cell must communicate with its surroundings, so all cells have them, and excitable cells, in particular, especially nerve cells, depend on the behavior of these channels. Every channel must be open at the appropriate time, and only then, so that each channel opens in response to the stimulus that tells that channel to open. One set of channels, including those in nerve cells, responds to voltage. There is a standard model for the gating of these channels that has a section of the protein moving in response to the voltage. However, there is evidence that protons are moving, rather than protein. Water is critical as part of the gating process, although it is hard to see how this works in the standard model. Here, we review the extensive evidence of the importance of the role of water and protons in gating these channels. Our principal example, but by no means the only example, will be the K<sub>v</sub>1.2 channel. Evidence comes from the effects of D<sub>2</sub>O, from mutations in the voltage sensing domain, as well as in the linker between that domain and the gate, and at the gate itself. There is additional evidence from computations, especially quantum calculations. Structural evidence comes from X-ray studies. The hydration of ions is critical in the transfer of ions in constricted spaces, such as the gate region and the pore of a channel; we will see how the structure of the hydrated ion fits with the structure of the channel. In addition, there is macroscopic evidence from osmotic experiments and streaming current measurements. The combined evidence is discussed in the context of a model that emphasizes the role of protons and water in gating these channels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Membranes\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10890431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Membranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14020037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Membranes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14020037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
离子通道在所有生命形式中无处不在。病毒中甚至也有钾离子通道。每个细胞都必须与周围环境进行交流,因此所有细胞都有离子通道,尤其是兴奋性细胞,特别是神经细胞,都依赖于这些通道的行为。每条通道都必须在适当的时候打开,而且只能在适当的时候打开,因此每条通道的打开都是对告诉该通道打开的刺激的反应。其中一组通道,包括神经细胞中的通道,会对电压做出反应。这些通道的门控有一个标准模型,即蛋白质的一部分随电压而移动。然而,有证据表明,移动的是质子,而不是蛋白质。水是门控过程的关键,尽管在标准模型中很难看到这一点。在此,我们回顾了水和质子在这些通道门控中的重要作用的大量证据。我们将以 Kv1.2 通道为例,但这绝不是唯一的例子。证据来自 D2O 的影响、电压感应结构域的突变、该结构域与栅极之间的连接体以及栅极本身。还有一些证据来自计算,特别是量子计算。结构证据来自 X 射线研究。离子的水合作用对于离子在狭小空间(如通道的栅极区域和孔隙)中的转移至关重要;我们将看到水合离子的结构如何与通道的结构相匹配。此外,渗透实验和流式电流测量也提供了宏观证据。我们将在强调质子和水在这些通道门控中的作用的模型中讨论综合证据。
Water, Protons, and the Gating of Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels.
Ion channels are ubiquitous throughout all forms of life. Potassium channels are even found in viruses. Every cell must communicate with its surroundings, so all cells have them, and excitable cells, in particular, especially nerve cells, depend on the behavior of these channels. Every channel must be open at the appropriate time, and only then, so that each channel opens in response to the stimulus that tells that channel to open. One set of channels, including those in nerve cells, responds to voltage. There is a standard model for the gating of these channels that has a section of the protein moving in response to the voltage. However, there is evidence that protons are moving, rather than protein. Water is critical as part of the gating process, although it is hard to see how this works in the standard model. Here, we review the extensive evidence of the importance of the role of water and protons in gating these channels. Our principal example, but by no means the only example, will be the Kv1.2 channel. Evidence comes from the effects of D2O, from mutations in the voltage sensing domain, as well as in the linker between that domain and the gate, and at the gate itself. There is additional evidence from computations, especially quantum calculations. Structural evidence comes from X-ray studies. The hydration of ions is critical in the transfer of ions in constricted spaces, such as the gate region and the pore of a channel; we will see how the structure of the hydrated ion fits with the structure of the channel. In addition, there is macroscopic evidence from osmotic experiments and streaming current measurements. The combined evidence is discussed in the context of a model that emphasizes the role of protons and water in gating these channels.
MembranesChemical Engineering-Filtration and Separation
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1071
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
Membranes (ISSN 2077-0375) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of separation science and technology. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided.