生物炭和有机肥对甘薯产量、品质、抗坏血酸、β-胡萝卜素、糖和酚含量的影响。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
George F Antonious
{"title":"生物炭和有机肥对甘薯产量、品质、抗坏血酸、β-胡萝卜素、糖和酚含量的影响。","authors":"George F Antonious","doi":"10.1080/09603123.2024.2318368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The demand for food is increasing and the use of soil organic amendments in agricultural management practices has been instructed to increase crop yield and reduce dependence on synthetic inorganic fertilizers at low cost to limited resource farmers. However, the effect of organic amendments on the quality and nutritional composition of edible plants has received little attention. Locally available organic amendments (sewage sludge SS, chicken manure CM, cow manure Cow, vermicompost Vermi, and biochar Bio) were chosen to test their impact on field-grown sweet potato, <i>Ipomoea batatas</i> L. yield, root quality, and root nutritional composition. The results indicated that utilizing Cow manure in growing sweet potatoes significantly promoted root yield and root nutritional composition. Cow treatment produced the greatest number of roots compared to Bio, CM, SS, and the control treatments. The results also revealed that the concentrations of vitamin C (260. 3 µg g<sup>-1</sup>), β-carotene (45.4 µg g<sup>-1</sup>), soluble sugars (16.7 mg g<sup>-1</sup>), and total phenols (196.3 3 µg g<sup>-1</sup> fresh roots) were greater in the roots of plants grown in Cow compared to the roots of the control treatment. The results indicated the low impact of biochar whereas Cow is recommended for enhancing sweet potato yield and nutritional composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":14039,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"3708-3719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of biochar and organic fertilizers on sweet potato yield, quality, ascorbic acid, <i>β</i>-carotene, sugars, and phenols contents.\",\"authors\":\"George F Antonious\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09603123.2024.2318368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The demand for food is increasing and the use of soil organic amendments in agricultural management practices has been instructed to increase crop yield and reduce dependence on synthetic inorganic fertilizers at low cost to limited resource farmers. However, the effect of organic amendments on the quality and nutritional composition of edible plants has received little attention. Locally available organic amendments (sewage sludge SS, chicken manure CM, cow manure Cow, vermicompost Vermi, and biochar Bio) were chosen to test their impact on field-grown sweet potato, <i>Ipomoea batatas</i> L. yield, root quality, and root nutritional composition. The results indicated that utilizing Cow manure in growing sweet potatoes significantly promoted root yield and root nutritional composition. Cow treatment produced the greatest number of roots compared to Bio, CM, SS, and the control treatments. The results also revealed that the concentrations of vitamin C (260. 3 µg g<sup>-1</sup>), β-carotene (45.4 µg g<sup>-1</sup>), soluble sugars (16.7 mg g<sup>-1</sup>), and total phenols (196.3 3 µg g<sup>-1</sup> fresh roots) were greater in the roots of plants grown in Cow compared to the roots of the control treatment. The results indicated the low impact of biochar whereas Cow is recommended for enhancing sweet potato yield and nutritional composition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Health Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3708-3719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2024.2318368\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2024.2318368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对粮食的需求与日俱增,在农业管理实践中使用土壤有机改良剂被认为可以提高作物产量,减少对合成无机肥料的依赖,而且对资源有限的农民来说成本低廉。然而,有机添加剂对可食用植物的质量和营养成分的影响却很少受到关注。我们选择了当地可用的有机添加剂(污水污泥 SS、鸡粪 CM、牛粪 Cow、蛭肥 Vermi 和生物炭 Bio)来测试它们对田间种植的甘薯(Ipomoea batatas L.)产量、根部质量和根部营养成分的影响。结果表明,利用牛粪种植甘薯能显著提高根的产量和营养成分。与 Bio、CM、SS 和对照处理相比,牛粪处理产生的根数量最多。结果还显示,与对照处理的根相比,牛粪处理的植株根中维生素 C(260.3 µg g-1)、β-胡萝卜素(45.4 µg g-1)、可溶性糖(16.7 mg g-1)和总酚(196.3 3 µg g-1 鲜根)的浓度更高。结果表明,生物炭的影响较小,而 Cow 建议用于提高甘薯产量和营养成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of biochar and organic fertilizers on sweet potato yield, quality, ascorbic acid, β-carotene, sugars, and phenols contents.

The demand for food is increasing and the use of soil organic amendments in agricultural management practices has been instructed to increase crop yield and reduce dependence on synthetic inorganic fertilizers at low cost to limited resource farmers. However, the effect of organic amendments on the quality and nutritional composition of edible plants has received little attention. Locally available organic amendments (sewage sludge SS, chicken manure CM, cow manure Cow, vermicompost Vermi, and biochar Bio) were chosen to test their impact on field-grown sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas L. yield, root quality, and root nutritional composition. The results indicated that utilizing Cow manure in growing sweet potatoes significantly promoted root yield and root nutritional composition. Cow treatment produced the greatest number of roots compared to Bio, CM, SS, and the control treatments. The results also revealed that the concentrations of vitamin C (260. 3 µg g-1), β-carotene (45.4 µg g-1), soluble sugars (16.7 mg g-1), and total phenols (196.3 3 µg g-1 fresh roots) were greater in the roots of plants grown in Cow compared to the roots of the control treatment. The results indicated the low impact of biochar whereas Cow is recommended for enhancing sweet potato yield and nutritional composition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Environmental Health Research
International Journal of Environmental Health Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Health Research ( IJEHR ) is devoted to the rapid publication of research in environmental health, acting as a link between the diverse research communities and practitioners in environmental health. Published articles encompass original research papers, technical notes and review articles. IJEHR publishes articles on all aspects of the interaction between the environment and human health. This interaction can broadly be divided into three areas: the natural environment and health – health implications and monitoring of air, water and soil pollutants and pollution and health improvements and air, water and soil quality standards; the built environment and health – occupational health and safety, exposure limits, monitoring and control of pollutants in the workplace, and standards of health; and communicable diseases – disease spread, control and prevention, food hygiene and control, and health aspects of rodents and insects. IJEHR is published in association with the International Federation of Environmental Health and includes news from the Federation of international meetings, courses and environmental health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信