对新确诊的局部前列腺癌患者病理解释门诊的纵向混合方法研究。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Sarah E Bergholtz, Sophia R Kurnot, Esha Elahi, Melissa DeJonckheere, Sarah T Hawley, Scott R Owens, Simpa Salami, Todd M Morgan, Cathryn J Lapedis
{"title":"对新确诊的局部前列腺癌患者病理解释门诊的纵向混合方法研究。","authors":"Sarah E Bergholtz, Sophia R Kurnot, Esha Elahi, Melissa DeJonckheere, Sarah T Hawley, Scott R Owens, Simpa Salami, Todd M Morgan, Cathryn J Lapedis","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the role of pathology explanation clinics (PECs) in prostate cancer care and determine their impact on patients, urologic oncologists, and quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews with 10 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were conducted before and after a PEC pilot and at the 1- and 6-month follow-up visits. Information about participants' cancer knowledge and anxiety were collected quantitatively. Documented pathologist communications and proper review of outside biopsy slides were collected. Semistructured interviews were also completed with participating urologic oncologists following the pilot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pathology explanation clinics improved participants' understanding of their diagnosis, cognitively and emotionally supporting them first in their urologic oncology visit and later in making an informed treatment decision. Mean knowledge scores were high, and a minority of participants had prostate cancer anxiety. Urologic oncologists noted improved understanding and reduced anxiety among participants, enabling nuanced conversations about prognosis and management during the visit. By ensuring review of outside biopsy slides and communication of clinically significant or unexpected diagnoses, PECs supported high-quality care and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this small pilot, PECs positively affected patients with prostate cancer, their clinicians, and the overall care system. Additional studies in larger populations and diverse settings will be useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A longitudinal mixed-methods study of pathology explanation clinics in patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E Bergholtz, Sophia R Kurnot, Esha Elahi, Melissa DeJonckheere, Sarah T Hawley, Scott R Owens, Simpa Salami, Todd M Morgan, Cathryn J Lapedis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajcp/aqae008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the role of pathology explanation clinics (PECs) in prostate cancer care and determine their impact on patients, urologic oncologists, and quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews with 10 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were conducted before and after a PEC pilot and at the 1- and 6-month follow-up visits. Information about participants' cancer knowledge and anxiety were collected quantitatively. Documented pathologist communications and proper review of outside biopsy slides were collected. Semistructured interviews were also completed with participating urologic oncologists following the pilot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pathology explanation clinics improved participants' understanding of their diagnosis, cognitively and emotionally supporting them first in their urologic oncology visit and later in making an informed treatment decision. Mean knowledge scores were high, and a minority of participants had prostate cancer anxiety. Urologic oncologists noted improved understanding and reduced anxiety among participants, enabling nuanced conversations about prognosis and management during the visit. By ensuring review of outside biopsy slides and communication of clinically significant or unexpected diagnoses, PECs supported high-quality care and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this small pilot, PECs positively affected patients with prostate cancer, their clinicians, and the overall care system. Additional studies in larger populations and diverse settings will be useful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述病理解释诊所(PEC)在前列腺癌治疗中的作用,并确定其对患者、泌尿科肿瘤学家和治疗质量的影响:在病理解释门诊试点前后以及 1 个月和 6 个月的随访中,对 10 名新确诊的前列腺癌患者进行了结构化访谈。定量收集了参与者的癌症知识和焦虑信息。此外,还收集了病理学家的沟通记录和对外部活检切片的适当审查。试点结束后,还对参与试点的泌尿科肿瘤专家进行了结构化访谈:结果:病理解释门诊提高了参与者对诊断的理解,为他们在泌尿肿瘤科就诊和随后做出知情治疗决定提供了认知和情感支持。平均知识得分很高,少数参与者有前列腺癌焦虑症。泌尿科肿瘤专家注意到,参与者对前列腺癌有了更多的了解,焦虑情绪也有所减轻,从而能够在就诊过程中就预后和治疗进行细致的交谈。通过确保对外部活检切片的审查以及对具有临床意义或意外诊断的沟通,PEC 支持了高质量的护理和患者安全:在这项小型试点中,PEC 对前列腺癌患者、临床医生和整个医疗系统都产生了积极影响。在更大的人群和不同的环境中进行更多的研究将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A longitudinal mixed-methods study of pathology explanation clinics in patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.

Objectives: To characterize the role of pathology explanation clinics (PECs) in prostate cancer care and determine their impact on patients, urologic oncologists, and quality of care.

Methods: Semistructured interviews with 10 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were conducted before and after a PEC pilot and at the 1- and 6-month follow-up visits. Information about participants' cancer knowledge and anxiety were collected quantitatively. Documented pathologist communications and proper review of outside biopsy slides were collected. Semistructured interviews were also completed with participating urologic oncologists following the pilot.

Results: Pathology explanation clinics improved participants' understanding of their diagnosis, cognitively and emotionally supporting them first in their urologic oncology visit and later in making an informed treatment decision. Mean knowledge scores were high, and a minority of participants had prostate cancer anxiety. Urologic oncologists noted improved understanding and reduced anxiety among participants, enabling nuanced conversations about prognosis and management during the visit. By ensuring review of outside biopsy slides and communication of clinically significant or unexpected diagnoses, PECs supported high-quality care and patient safety.

Conclusions: In this small pilot, PECs positively affected patients with prostate cancer, their clinicians, and the overall care system. Additional studies in larger populations and diverse settings will be useful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信