Lars Eisen , Megan E.M. Saunders , Vicki L. Kramer , Rebecca J. Eisen
{"title":"西部黑腿蜱(Ixodes pacificus)在美国的地理分布史","authors":"Lars Eisen , Megan E.M. Saunders , Vicki L. Kramer , Rebecca J. Eisen","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Ixodes pacificus</em> (the western blacklegged tick) occurs in the far western United States (US), where it commonly bites humans. This tick was not considered a species of medical concern until it was implicated in the 1980s as a vector of Lyme disease spirochetes. Later, it was discovered to also be the primary vector to humans in the far western US of agents causing anaplasmosis and hard tick relapsing fever. The core distribution of <em>I. pacificus</em> in the US includes California, western Oregon, and western Washington, with outlier populations reported in Utah and Arizona. In this review, we provide a history of the documented occurrence of <em>I. pacificus</em> in the US from the 1890s to present, and discuss associations of its geographic range with landscape, hosts, and climate. In contrast to <em>Ixodes scapularis</em> (the blacklegged tick) in the eastern US, there is no evidence for a dramatic change in the geographic distribution of <em>I. pacificus</em> over the last half-century. Field surveys in the 1930s and 1940s documented <em>I. pacificus</em> along the Pacific Coast from southern California to northern Washington, in the Sierra Nevada foothills, and in western Utah. County level collection records often included both immatures and adults of <em>I. pacificus</em>, recovered by drag sampling or from humans, domestic animals, and wildlife. The estimated geographic distribution presented for <em>I. pacificus</em> in 1945 by Bishopp and Trembley is similar to that presented in 2022 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There is no clear evidence of range expansion for <em>I. pacificus</em>, separate from tick records in new areas that could have resulted from newly initiated or intensified surveillance efforts. Moreover, there is no evidence from long-term studies that the density of questing <em>I. pacificus</em> ticks has increased over time in specific areas. It therefore is not surprising that the incidence of Lyme disease has remained stable in the Pacific Coast states from the early 1990s, when it became a notifiable condition, to present. We note that deforestation and deer depredation were less severe in the far western US during the 1800s and early 1900s compared to the eastern US. This likely contributed to <em>I. pacificus</em> maintaining stable, widespread populations across its geographic range in the far western US in the early 1900s, while <em>I. scapularis</em> during the same time period appears to have been restricted to a small number of geographically isolated refugia sites within its present range in the eastern US. The impact that a warming climate may have had on the geographic distribution and local abundance of <em>I. pacificus</em> in recent decades remains unclear.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"15 3","pages":"Article 102325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000189/pdfft?md5=90d5dea6d596507a94a01843e534e732&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X24000189-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History of the geographic distribution of the western blacklegged tick, Ixodes pacificus, in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Lars Eisen , Megan E.M. Saunders , Vicki L. Kramer , Rebecca J. Eisen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Ixodes pacificus</em> (the western blacklegged tick) occurs in the far western United States (US), where it commonly bites humans. This tick was not considered a species of medical concern until it was implicated in the 1980s as a vector of Lyme disease spirochetes. Later, it was discovered to also be the primary vector to humans in the far western US of agents causing anaplasmosis and hard tick relapsing fever. The core distribution of <em>I. pacificus</em> in the US includes California, western Oregon, and western Washington, with outlier populations reported in Utah and Arizona. In this review, we provide a history of the documented occurrence of <em>I. pacificus</em> in the US from the 1890s to present, and discuss associations of its geographic range with landscape, hosts, and climate. In contrast to <em>Ixodes scapularis</em> (the blacklegged tick) in the eastern US, there is no evidence for a dramatic change in the geographic distribution of <em>I. pacificus</em> over the last half-century. Field surveys in the 1930s and 1940s documented <em>I. pacificus</em> along the Pacific Coast from southern California to northern Washington, in the Sierra Nevada foothills, and in western Utah. County level collection records often included both immatures and adults of <em>I. pacificus</em>, recovered by drag sampling or from humans, domestic animals, and wildlife. The estimated geographic distribution presented for <em>I. pacificus</em> in 1945 by Bishopp and Trembley is similar to that presented in 2022 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There is no clear evidence of range expansion for <em>I. pacificus</em>, separate from tick records in new areas that could have resulted from newly initiated or intensified surveillance efforts. Moreover, there is no evidence from long-term studies that the density of questing <em>I. pacificus</em> ticks has increased over time in specific areas. It therefore is not surprising that the incidence of Lyme disease has remained stable in the Pacific Coast states from the early 1990s, when it became a notifiable condition, to present. We note that deforestation and deer depredation were less severe in the far western US during the 1800s and early 1900s compared to the eastern US. This likely contributed to <em>I. pacificus</em> maintaining stable, widespread populations across its geographic range in the far western US in the early 1900s, while <em>I. scapularis</em> during the same time period appears to have been restricted to a small number of geographically isolated refugia sites within its present range in the eastern US. The impact that a warming climate may have had on the geographic distribution and local abundance of <em>I. pacificus</em> in recent decades remains unclear.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 102325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000189/pdfft?md5=90d5dea6d596507a94a01843e534e732&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X24000189-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000189\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Ixodes pacificus(西部黑腿蜱)分布在美国最西部,通常叮咬人类。这种蜱虫在 20 世纪 80 年代被认为是莱姆病螺旋体的传播媒介之前,一直不被认为是医学关注的物种。后来,人们发现它也是美国最西部人类感染无性繁殖体病和硬蜱复发热的主要病媒。太平洋蜱(I. pacificus)在美国的核心分布区包括加利福尼亚州、俄勒冈州西部和华盛顿州西部,犹他州和亚利桑那州也有外围种群的报道。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了从 19 世纪 90 年代至今太平洋伊蚊在美国出现的历史,并讨论了其地理分布与地貌、宿主和气候的关系。与美国东部的黑脚蜱(Ixodes scapularis)相比,没有证据表明太平洋蜱在过去半个世纪中的地理分布发生了巨大变化。20 世纪 30 年代和 40 年代的实地调查记录了 I. pacificus 在从加利福尼亚南部到华盛顿北部的太平洋沿岸、内华达山脉山麓和犹他州西部的分布情况。县一级的采集记录通常包括通过拖曳取样或从人类、家畜和野生动物身上采集到的 I. pacificus 幼虫和成虫。Bishopp 和 Trembley 在 1945 年提出的太平洋虹吸虫估计地理分布与美国疾病控制与预防中心在 2022 年提出的分布相似。除了新地区的蜱虫记录外,没有明确的证据表明太平洋蜱的分布范围有所扩大,这可能是由于新近启动或加强了监测工作。此外,长期研究也没有证据表明,在特定地区,寻找 I. pacificus 的蜱虫密度随着时间的推移而增加。因此,从 20 世纪 90 年代初莱姆病成为一种可通报的疾病至今,太平洋沿岸各州的莱姆病发病率一直保持稳定也就不足为奇了。我们注意到,与美国东部相比,19 世纪和 20 世纪初美国西部远端地区的森林砍伐和捕鹿活动并不那么严重。这可能是导致 I. pacificus 在 20 世纪初在美国西部远端地区保持稳定、广泛种群的原因,而 I. scapularis 在同一时期似乎只局限于美国东部目前分布区内少数地理位置孤立的避难所。近几十年来,气候变暖对太平洋蛙地理分布和当地数量的影响尚不清楚。
History of the geographic distribution of the western blacklegged tick, Ixodes pacificus, in the United States
Ixodes pacificus (the western blacklegged tick) occurs in the far western United States (US), where it commonly bites humans. This tick was not considered a species of medical concern until it was implicated in the 1980s as a vector of Lyme disease spirochetes. Later, it was discovered to also be the primary vector to humans in the far western US of agents causing anaplasmosis and hard tick relapsing fever. The core distribution of I. pacificus in the US includes California, western Oregon, and western Washington, with outlier populations reported in Utah and Arizona. In this review, we provide a history of the documented occurrence of I. pacificus in the US from the 1890s to present, and discuss associations of its geographic range with landscape, hosts, and climate. In contrast to Ixodes scapularis (the blacklegged tick) in the eastern US, there is no evidence for a dramatic change in the geographic distribution of I. pacificus over the last half-century. Field surveys in the 1930s and 1940s documented I. pacificus along the Pacific Coast from southern California to northern Washington, in the Sierra Nevada foothills, and in western Utah. County level collection records often included both immatures and adults of I. pacificus, recovered by drag sampling or from humans, domestic animals, and wildlife. The estimated geographic distribution presented for I. pacificus in 1945 by Bishopp and Trembley is similar to that presented in 2022 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There is no clear evidence of range expansion for I. pacificus, separate from tick records in new areas that could have resulted from newly initiated or intensified surveillance efforts. Moreover, there is no evidence from long-term studies that the density of questing I. pacificus ticks has increased over time in specific areas. It therefore is not surprising that the incidence of Lyme disease has remained stable in the Pacific Coast states from the early 1990s, when it became a notifiable condition, to present. We note that deforestation and deer depredation were less severe in the far western US during the 1800s and early 1900s compared to the eastern US. This likely contributed to I. pacificus maintaining stable, widespread populations across its geographic range in the far western US in the early 1900s, while I. scapularis during the same time period appears to have been restricted to a small number of geographically isolated refugia sites within its present range in the eastern US. The impact that a warming climate may have had on the geographic distribution and local abundance of I. pacificus in recent decades remains unclear.
期刊介绍:
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials.
The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.