臭氧和激光对牙本质过敏治疗的影响:随机临床研究

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Maurizio D’Amario DDS, PhD , Mariachiara Di Carlo DDS , Ali Jahjah , Stefania Mauro DDS , Salvatore Natale MD , Mario Capogreco DDS
{"title":"臭氧和激光对牙本质过敏治疗的影响:随机临床研究","authors":"Maurizio D’Amario DDS, PhD ,&nbsp;Mariachiara Di Carlo DDS ,&nbsp;Ali Jahjah ,&nbsp;Stefania Mauro DDS ,&nbsp;Salvatore Natale MD ,&nbsp;Mario Capogreco DDS","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of diode laser and ozone gas in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DHS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred thirty-two teeth from 44 patients with moderate DHS were randomized into 3 groups according to a split-mouth design. In the diode laser group, the operator irradiated the superficial dentin exposed with an 808-nm wavelength and incremental power from 0.2 to 0.6 W with a 20-second interval. In the ozone gas group, the operator applied a high dose of ozone (32 g/m<sup>3</sup>) for 30 seconds using a silicon cup. In the placebo group, no therapy was applied. The dentin sensitivity level was evaluated upon enrollment (T0), immediately after treatment (T1), 3 months post-treatment (T2), and 6 months post-treatment (T3) with a cold air blast challenge and tactile stimuli. The pain severity was quantified according to the visual analogue scale. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to scrutinize potential statistical disparities among the treatments. Statistical significance was predetermined at <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A significant decrease of DHS was observed in the ozone gas group and the `diode laser group immediately after treatment and after 3 and 6 months of the therapy. After 6 months from the therapy, the sensitivity values in the teeth treated with ozone gas remained statistically lower than those treated with diode lasers (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A laser diode and ozone gas are both efficient as dentin sensitivity treatment. Ozone maintains an invariable effectiveness after 6 months.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ozone and Laser Effects on Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Study\",\"authors\":\"Maurizio D’Amario DDS, PhD ,&nbsp;Mariachiara Di Carlo DDS ,&nbsp;Ali Jahjah ,&nbsp;Stefania Mauro DDS ,&nbsp;Salvatore Natale MD ,&nbsp;Mario Capogreco DDS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2024.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of diode laser and ozone gas in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DHS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred thirty-two teeth from 44 patients with moderate DHS were randomized into 3 groups according to a split-mouth design. In the diode laser group, the operator irradiated the superficial dentin exposed with an 808-nm wavelength and incremental power from 0.2 to 0.6 W with a 20-second interval. In the ozone gas group, the operator applied a high dose of ozone (32 g/m<sup>3</sup>) for 30 seconds using a silicon cup. In the placebo group, no therapy was applied. The dentin sensitivity level was evaluated upon enrollment (T0), immediately after treatment (T1), 3 months post-treatment (T2), and 6 months post-treatment (T3) with a cold air blast challenge and tactile stimuli. The pain severity was quantified according to the visual analogue scale. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to scrutinize potential statistical disparities among the treatments. Statistical significance was predetermined at <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A significant decrease of DHS was observed in the ozone gas group and the `diode laser group immediately after treatment and after 3 and 6 months of the therapy. After 6 months from the therapy, the sensitivity values in the teeth treated with ozone gas remained statistically lower than those treated with diode lasers (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A laser diode and ozone gas are both efficient as dentin sensitivity treatment. Ozone maintains an invariable effectiveness after 6 months.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924001018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924001018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 将 44 名中度牙本质过敏症(DHS)患者的 132 颗牙齿按照分口设计随机分为 3 组。在二极管激光组,操作者用波长为 808 纳米、功率从 0.2 瓦到 0.6 瓦递增、间隔 20 秒的激光照射暴露的浅层牙本质。在臭氧气体组,操作员使用硅杯将高剂量臭氧(32 克/立方米)照射 30 秒。安慰剂组不使用任何疗法。通过冷空气冲击挑战和触觉刺激对牙本质敏感程度进行评估,评估时间分别为入院时(T0)、治疗后即刻(T1)、治疗后 3 个月(T2)和治疗后 6 个月(T3)。疼痛严重程度根据视觉模拟量表进行量化。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验来仔细检查各治疗方法之间可能存在的统计差异。结果 臭氧气体组和二极管激光组在治疗后立即以及治疗 3 个月和 6 个月后,DHS 明显下降。治疗 6 个月后,使用臭氧气体治疗的牙齿的敏感度值在统计学上仍然低于使用二极管激光治疗的牙齿(P <.05)。臭氧在 6 个月后仍保持不变的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ozone and Laser Effects on Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Study

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of diode laser and ozone gas in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DHS).

Methods

One hundred thirty-two teeth from 44 patients with moderate DHS were randomized into 3 groups according to a split-mouth design. In the diode laser group, the operator irradiated the superficial dentin exposed with an 808-nm wavelength and incremental power from 0.2 to 0.6 W with a 20-second interval. In the ozone gas group, the operator applied a high dose of ozone (32 g/m3) for 30 seconds using a silicon cup. In the placebo group, no therapy was applied. The dentin sensitivity level was evaluated upon enrollment (T0), immediately after treatment (T1), 3 months post-treatment (T2), and 6 months post-treatment (T3) with a cold air blast challenge and tactile stimuli. The pain severity was quantified according to the visual analogue scale. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to scrutinize potential statistical disparities among the treatments. Statistical significance was predetermined at P < .05.

Results

A significant decrease of DHS was observed in the ozone gas group and the `diode laser group immediately after treatment and after 3 and 6 months of the therapy. After 6 months from the therapy, the sensitivity values in the teeth treated with ozone gas remained statistically lower than those treated with diode lasers (P < .05).

Conclusions

A laser diode and ozone gas are both efficient as dentin sensitivity treatment. Ozone maintains an invariable effectiveness after 6 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信