通过最大单次重复评估踝关节力量:检测慢性踝关节外侧不稳弱点的新方法

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Aude Aguilaniu , Cédric Schwartz , Guillaume Abran , Laura Baudoux , Prof Jean-Louis Croisier
{"title":"通过最大单次重复评估踝关节力量:检测慢性踝关节外侧不稳弱点的新方法","authors":"Aude Aguilaniu ,&nbsp;Cédric Schwartz ,&nbsp;Guillaume Abran ,&nbsp;Laura Baudoux ,&nbsp;Prof Jean-Louis Croisier","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ankle muscle strength should be assessed after a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) because a strength deficit can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). No field method is available to obtain quantitative ankle dynamic strength values. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the one-repetition maximal (1-RM) method and to compare ankle muscle strength between healthy volunteers and those with CAI using 1-RM strength assessment approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We recruited 31 healthy volunteers and 32 with CAI. Dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor 1-RM were performed twice at a one-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Strength values were compared between healthy volunteers and CAI.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 1-RM method is reliable for assessing ankle dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor strength, with an ICC ranging from 0.76 to 0.88, and MDC ranging from 19 to 31%. Volunteers with CAI obtained evertor (3.0 vs. 3.5 N/kg), invertor (2.9 vs. 3.7 N/kg), and dorsiflexor (5.9 vs. 6.5 N/kg) strength values that were lower than healthy volunteers (p &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The 1-RM test can be used in practice to assess evertor, invertor, and dorsiflexor strength during the rehabilitation of LAS. This field method could help practitioners to detect a strength deficit and individualize a strengthening programme if necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ankle strength assessed by one repetition maximum: A new approach to detect weaknesses in chronic ankle lateral instability\",\"authors\":\"Aude Aguilaniu ,&nbsp;Cédric Schwartz ,&nbsp;Guillaume Abran ,&nbsp;Laura Baudoux ,&nbsp;Prof Jean-Louis Croisier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Ankle muscle strength should be assessed after a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) because a strength deficit can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). No field method is available to obtain quantitative ankle dynamic strength values. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the one-repetition maximal (1-RM) method and to compare ankle muscle strength between healthy volunteers and those with CAI using 1-RM strength assessment approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We recruited 31 healthy volunteers and 32 with CAI. Dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor 1-RM were performed twice at a one-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Strength values were compared between healthy volunteers and CAI.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 1-RM method is reliable for assessing ankle dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor strength, with an ICC ranging from 0.76 to 0.88, and MDC ranging from 19 to 31%. Volunteers with CAI obtained evertor (3.0 vs. 3.5 N/kg), invertor (2.9 vs. 3.7 N/kg), and dorsiflexor (5.9 vs. 6.5 N/kg) strength values that were lower than healthy volunteers (p &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The 1-RM test can be used in practice to assess evertor, invertor, and dorsiflexor strength during the rehabilitation of LAS. This field method could help practitioners to detect a strength deficit and individualize a strengthening programme if necessary.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S126877312400033X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S126877312400033X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景外踝扭伤(LAS)后应评估踝关节肌肉力量,因为力量不足会导致慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)。目前还没有一种现场方法可以获得定量的踝关节动态力量值。本研究旨在评估单次最大重复(1-RM)方法的可靠性,并使用 1-RM 力量评估方法比较健康志愿者和 CAI 患者的踝关节肌肉力量。在间隔一周的时间内进行两次背屈、外翻和内翻 1-RM 训练。计算了类内相关系数(ICC)和最小可检测变化(MDC)。结果1-RM法在评估踝关节背屈、外翻和内翻力量方面是可靠的,其ICC范围为0.76-0.88,MDC范围为19-31%。患有 CAI 的志愿者获得的倒立(3.0 对 3.5 N/kg)、倒转(2.9 对 3.7 N/kg)和背屈(5.9 对 6.5 N/kg)力量值均低于健康志愿者(p < 0.05)。这种现场方法可帮助从业人员发现力量不足,并在必要时制定个性化的强化计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ankle strength assessed by one repetition maximum: A new approach to detect weaknesses in chronic ankle lateral instability

Background

Ankle muscle strength should be assessed after a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) because a strength deficit can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). No field method is available to obtain quantitative ankle dynamic strength values. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the one-repetition maximal (1-RM) method and to compare ankle muscle strength between healthy volunteers and those with CAI using 1-RM strength assessment approach.

Methods

We recruited 31 healthy volunteers and 32 with CAI. Dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor 1-RM were performed twice at a one-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Strength values were compared between healthy volunteers and CAI.

Results

The 1-RM method is reliable for assessing ankle dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor strength, with an ICC ranging from 0.76 to 0.88, and MDC ranging from 19 to 31%. Volunteers with CAI obtained evertor (3.0 vs. 3.5 N/kg), invertor (2.9 vs. 3.7 N/kg), and dorsiflexor (5.9 vs. 6.5 N/kg) strength values that were lower than healthy volunteers (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The 1-RM test can be used in practice to assess evertor, invertor, and dorsiflexor strength during the rehabilitation of LAS. This field method could help practitioners to detect a strength deficit and individualize a strengthening programme if necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信