通过改变进气压力和废气再循环率实现不同等效比对双燃料压燃式发动机燃烧效率特性的影响

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Jeongwoo Lee, Sanghyun Chu, Jaegu Kang, Kyoungdoug Min
{"title":"通过改变进气压力和废气再循环率实现不同等效比对双燃料压燃式发动机燃烧效率特性的影响","authors":"Jeongwoo Lee, Sanghyun Chu, Jaegu Kang, Kyoungdoug Min","doi":"10.1007/s12239-024-00005-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In general, a leaner mixture condition improves combustion efficiency in compression ignition (CI) combustion using diesel. However, in the case of leaner air–fuel mixture conditions, it disturbs flame propagation in spark ignition combustion using gasoline, i.e., low reactivity fuel, causing a decrease in combustion efficiency. Since dual-fuel combustion in a CI engine typically involves the use of high- and low-reactivity fuels together, the differing reactivity conditions in the cylinder become as important as the local equivalence ratio in the cylinder. Thus, there is a need to verify the effect of a leaner mixture condition on combustion efficiency in dual-fuel CI combustion. For this reason, this study experimentally evaluates the effects of varying equivalence ratios on the combustion efficiency of gasoline/diesel dual-fueled CI combustion in a 0.4-L single-cylinder engine under low-speed (1500 rpm) and low-load (total LHV 570 J/str) conditions. To vary the equivalence ratios, intake pressures and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rates were, respectively, changed under the part-load condition. The results emphasize that as the equivalence ratio becomes leaner by increasing the intake pressure, combustion efficiency worsens due to the low reactivity properties and certain flame propagation modes of gasoline combustion. On the contrary, increasing the EGR rate did not significantly influence combustion efficiency, but it effectively helped reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. Based on these results, it is concluded that optimizing dual-fuel CI combustion to suppress NOx emissions is better achieved using EGR, rather than creating a leaner mixture condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":50338,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Automotive Technology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Varying Equivalence Ratios on the Combustion Efficiency Characteristic of a Dual-Fuel Compression Ignition Engine by Changing Intake Pressures and Exhaust Gas Recirculation Rates\",\"authors\":\"Jeongwoo Lee, Sanghyun Chu, Jaegu Kang, Kyoungdoug Min\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12239-024-00005-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In general, a leaner mixture condition improves combustion efficiency in compression ignition (CI) combustion using diesel. However, in the case of leaner air–fuel mixture conditions, it disturbs flame propagation in spark ignition combustion using gasoline, i.e., low reactivity fuel, causing a decrease in combustion efficiency. Since dual-fuel combustion in a CI engine typically involves the use of high- and low-reactivity fuels together, the differing reactivity conditions in the cylinder become as important as the local equivalence ratio in the cylinder. Thus, there is a need to verify the effect of a leaner mixture condition on combustion efficiency in dual-fuel CI combustion. For this reason, this study experimentally evaluates the effects of varying equivalence ratios on the combustion efficiency of gasoline/diesel dual-fueled CI combustion in a 0.4-L single-cylinder engine under low-speed (1500 rpm) and low-load (total LHV 570 J/str) conditions. To vary the equivalence ratios, intake pressures and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rates were, respectively, changed under the part-load condition. The results emphasize that as the equivalence ratio becomes leaner by increasing the intake pressure, combustion efficiency worsens due to the low reactivity properties and certain flame propagation modes of gasoline combustion. On the contrary, increasing the EGR rate did not significantly influence combustion efficiency, but it effectively helped reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. Based on these results, it is concluded that optimizing dual-fuel CI combustion to suppress NOx emissions is better achieved using EGR, rather than creating a leaner mixture condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Automotive Technology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Automotive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-024-00005-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Automotive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-024-00005-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一般来说,在使用柴油进行压燃(CI)燃烧时,较稀的混合气条件可提高燃烧效率。然而,在使用汽油(即低反应性燃料)进行火花点火燃烧时,较稀薄的空气-燃料混合气条件会干扰火焰的传播,从而导致燃烧效率降低。由于 CI 发动机中的双燃料燃烧通常需要同时使用高活性和低活性燃料,因此气缸中不同的活性条件与气缸中的局部等效比同样重要。因此,有必要验证较稀混合气条件对双燃料 CI 燃烧效率的影响。因此,本研究通过实验评估了在低速(1500 rpm)和低负荷(总 LHV 570 J/str)条件下,不同等效比对 0.4 升单缸发动机中汽油/柴油双燃料 CI 燃烧效率的影响。为了改变等效比,在部分负荷条件下分别改变了进气压力和废气再循环(EGR)率。结果表明,由于汽油燃烧的低反应特性和特定的火焰传播模式,当通过增加进气压力使等效比变得更低时,燃烧效率会降低。相反,提高 EGR 率对燃烧效率的影响不大,但却能有效减少氮氧化物(NOx)的排放。基于这些结果,可以得出结论:优化双燃料 CI 燃烧以抑制氮氧化物排放的最佳方法是使用 EGR,而不是创建更稀薄的混合气条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of Varying Equivalence Ratios on the Combustion Efficiency Characteristic of a Dual-Fuel Compression Ignition Engine by Changing Intake Pressures and Exhaust Gas Recirculation Rates

Effects of Varying Equivalence Ratios on the Combustion Efficiency Characteristic of a Dual-Fuel Compression Ignition Engine by Changing Intake Pressures and Exhaust Gas Recirculation Rates

In general, a leaner mixture condition improves combustion efficiency in compression ignition (CI) combustion using diesel. However, in the case of leaner air–fuel mixture conditions, it disturbs flame propagation in spark ignition combustion using gasoline, i.e., low reactivity fuel, causing a decrease in combustion efficiency. Since dual-fuel combustion in a CI engine typically involves the use of high- and low-reactivity fuels together, the differing reactivity conditions in the cylinder become as important as the local equivalence ratio in the cylinder. Thus, there is a need to verify the effect of a leaner mixture condition on combustion efficiency in dual-fuel CI combustion. For this reason, this study experimentally evaluates the effects of varying equivalence ratios on the combustion efficiency of gasoline/diesel dual-fueled CI combustion in a 0.4-L single-cylinder engine under low-speed (1500 rpm) and low-load (total LHV 570 J/str) conditions. To vary the equivalence ratios, intake pressures and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rates were, respectively, changed under the part-load condition. The results emphasize that as the equivalence ratio becomes leaner by increasing the intake pressure, combustion efficiency worsens due to the low reactivity properties and certain flame propagation modes of gasoline combustion. On the contrary, increasing the EGR rate did not significantly influence combustion efficiency, but it effectively helped reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. Based on these results, it is concluded that optimizing dual-fuel CI combustion to suppress NOx emissions is better achieved using EGR, rather than creating a leaner mixture condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Automotive Technology
International Journal of Automotive Technology 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Automotive Technology has as its objective the publication and dissemination of original research in all fields of AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY, SCIENCE and ENGINEERING. It fosters thus the exchange of ideas among researchers in different parts of the world and also among researchers who emphasize different aspects of the foundations and applications of the field. Standing as it does at the cross-roads of Physics, Chemistry, Mechanics, Engineering Design and Materials Sciences, AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY is experiencing considerable growth as a result of recent technological advances. The Journal, by providing an international medium of communication, is encouraging this growth and is encompassing all aspects of the field from thermal engineering, flow analysis, structural analysis, modal analysis, control, vehicular electronics, mechatronis, electro-mechanical engineering, optimum design methods, ITS, and recycling. Interest extends from the basic science to technology applications with analytical, experimental and numerical studies. The emphasis is placed on contributions that appear to be of permanent interest to research workers and engineers in the field. If furthering knowledge in the area of principal concern of the Journal, papers of primary interest to the innovative disciplines of AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY, SCIENCE and ENGINEERING may be published. Papers that are merely illustrations of established principles and procedures, even though possibly containing new numerical or experimental data, will generally not be published. When outstanding advances are made in existing areas or when new areas have been developed to a definitive stage, special review articles will be considered by the editors. No length limitations for contributions are set, but only concisely written papers are published. Brief articles are considered on the basis of technical merit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信