土耳其版轻度行为障碍检查表在认知障碍患者中的有效性和可靠性。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
İmge Coskun Pektas, Cansu Budak, Kadir Pektas, Cansun Sahin Cam, Rumeysa Tasdelen, Can Ilgin, Serhat Ergun
{"title":"土耳其版轻度行为障碍检查表在认知障碍患者中的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"İmge Coskun Pektas, Cansu Budak, Kadir Pektas, Cansun Sahin Cam, Rumeysa Tasdelen, Can Ilgin, Serhat Ergun","doi":"10.1177/08919887231225485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The Mild Behavioral Impairment-Checklist (MBI-C) was developed to detect and standardize neuropsychiatric symptoms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the MBI-C.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample of our study consisted of 80 patients with cognitive impairment and a control group with 113 participants whose cognitive impairment was not detected in standard tests. Participants were evaluated with the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), MBI-C and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>In the reliability analysis, the Cronbach-alpha value for MBI-C was found to be .810. In the ROC analysis performed with the total MBI-C score, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as .821 and the cut-off score was determined as 8.5; sensitivity was calculated as .77 and specificity as .83. A strong positive correlation was found between test-retest MBI-C scores (r = .886, <i>P</i> < .0019). A strong positive correlation was found between MBI-C and NPI scores (r = .964, <i>P</i> < .001). MBI-C scores were significantly negatively correlated with MMSE and MoCA scores and positively correlated with GDS-15 scores. The results of our study showed that the Turkish version of the MBI-C is a valid and reliable measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"387-394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist in Patients With Cognitive Impairment.\",\"authors\":\"İmge Coskun Pektas, Cansu Budak, Kadir Pektas, Cansun Sahin Cam, Rumeysa Tasdelen, Can Ilgin, Serhat Ergun\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08919887231225485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The Mild Behavioral Impairment-Checklist (MBI-C) was developed to detect and standardize neuropsychiatric symptoms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the MBI-C.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample of our study consisted of 80 patients with cognitive impairment and a control group with 113 participants whose cognitive impairment was not detected in standard tests. Participants were evaluated with the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), MBI-C and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>In the reliability analysis, the Cronbach-alpha value for MBI-C was found to be .810. In the ROC analysis performed with the total MBI-C score, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as .821 and the cut-off score was determined as 8.5; sensitivity was calculated as .77 and specificity as .83. A strong positive correlation was found between test-retest MBI-C scores (r = .886, <i>P</i> < .0019). A strong positive correlation was found between MBI-C and NPI scores (r = .964, <i>P</i> < .001). MBI-C scores were significantly negatively correlated with MMSE and MoCA scores and positively correlated with GDS-15 scores. The results of our study showed that the Turkish version of the MBI-C is a valid and reliable measurement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"387-394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887231225485\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887231225485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:开发轻度行为障碍检查表(MBI-C)是为了检测和标准化神经精神症状。本研究旨在评估 MBI-C 在土耳其的适应性、有效性和可靠性:研究样本包括 80 名认知障碍患者和 113 名在标准测试中未检测出认知障碍的对照组参与者。参与者接受了标准化小型精神状态检查(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、老年抑郁量表-15(GDS-15)、MBI-C 和神经精神量表(NPI)的评估:在信度分析中,MBI-C 的 Cronbach-alpha 值为 0.810。在对 MBI-C 总分进行的 ROC 分析中,计算出的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.821,截断分数被确定为 8.5;计算出的灵敏度为 0.77,特异性为 0.83。MBI-C 测试-重测得分之间存在很强的正相关性(r = .886,P < .0019)。MBI-C 和 NPI 分数之间存在很强的正相关性(r = .964,P < .001)。MBI-C 评分与 MMSE 和 MoCA 评分呈明显负相关,与 GDS-15 评分呈正相关。我们的研究结果表明,土耳其版 MBI-C 是一种有效、可靠的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist in Patients With Cognitive Impairment.

Background and objective: The Mild Behavioral Impairment-Checklist (MBI-C) was developed to detect and standardize neuropsychiatric symptoms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the MBI-C.

Methods: The sample of our study consisted of 80 patients with cognitive impairment and a control group with 113 participants whose cognitive impairment was not detected in standard tests. Participants were evaluated with the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), MBI-C and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).

Results and conclusion: In the reliability analysis, the Cronbach-alpha value for MBI-C was found to be .810. In the ROC analysis performed with the total MBI-C score, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as .821 and the cut-off score was determined as 8.5; sensitivity was calculated as .77 and specificity as .83. A strong positive correlation was found between test-retest MBI-C scores (r = .886, P < .0019). A strong positive correlation was found between MBI-C and NPI scores (r = .964, P < .001). MBI-C scores were significantly negatively correlated with MMSE and MoCA scores and positively correlated with GDS-15 scores. The results of our study showed that the Turkish version of the MBI-C is a valid and reliable measurement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信