我们该如何分割执行功能蛋糕？努力构建认知控制过程的本体论

IF 1.9 4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Mind Brain and Education Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1111/mbe.12403

Silvia A. Bunge

{"title":"我们该如何分割执行功能蛋糕？努力构建认知控制过程的本体论","authors":"Silvia A. Bunge","doi":"10.1111/mbe.12403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a vast literature on executive functioning, or the control of one's thoughts and actions in pursuit of a goal. This broad construct is conceptualized as comprising multiple executive functions (EFs) that support academic achievement and other important life outcomes. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding what, exactly, these core EFs are. This commentary briefly reviews a few dominant models of EFs in developmental and cognitive psychology and outlines issues to be addressed; it then illustrates how insights from neuroscience could help us eliminate redundant terminology and identify EFs that have been largely overlooked. Reaching a consensus regarding the core set of EFs will inform efforts to scaffold EF development and improve educational outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51595,"journal":{"name":"Mind Brain and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Should We Slice Up the Executive Function Pie? Striving Toward an Ontology of Cognitive Control Processes\",\"authors\":\"Silvia A. Bunge\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mbe.12403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a vast literature on executive functioning, or the control of one's thoughts and actions in pursuit of a goal. This broad construct is conceptualized as comprising multiple executive functions (EFs) that support academic achievement and other important life outcomes. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding what, exactly, these core EFs are. This commentary briefly reviews a few dominant models of EFs in developmental and cognitive psychology and outlines issues to be addressed; it then illustrates how insights from neuroscience could help us eliminate redundant terminology and identify EFs that have been largely overlooked. Reaching a consensus regarding the core set of EFs will inform efforts to scaffold EF development and improve educational outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mind Brain and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mind Brain and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12403\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind Brain and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于执行功能，或者说在追求目标的过程中对自己的思想和行动的控制，已有大量文献论述。从概念上讲，这种广泛的结构包括多种执行功能（EFs），它们支持学业成绩和其他重要的生活成果。然而，对于这些核心执行功能究竟是什么，目前还缺乏共识。本评论简要回顾了发展心理学和认知心理学中几种主流的 EFs 模型，并概述了需要解决的问题；然后说明了神经科学的见解如何帮助我们消除多余的术语，并找出在很大程度上被忽视的 EFs。就一系列核心的外倾因素达成共识，将为外倾因素的发展和改善教育成果提供参考。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How Should We Slice Up the Executive Function Pie? Striving Toward an Ontology of Cognitive Control Processes

There is a vast literature on executive functioning, or the control of one's thoughts and actions in pursuit of a goal. This broad construct is conceptualized as comprising multiple executive functions (EFs) that support academic achievement and other important life outcomes. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding what, exactly, these core EFs are. This commentary briefly reviews a few dominant models of EFs in developmental and cognitive psychology and outlines issues to be addressed; it then illustrates how insights from neuroscience could help us eliminate redundant terminology and identify EFs that have been largely overlooked. Reaching a consensus regarding the core set of EFs will inform efforts to scaffold EF development and improve educational outcomes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Mind Brain and Education Multiple-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE), recognized as the 2007 Best New Journal in the Social Sciences & Humanities by the Association of American Publishers" Professional & Scholarly Publishing Division, provides a forum for the accessible presentation of basic and applied research on learning and development, including analyses from biology, cognitive science, and education. The journal grew out of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society"s mission to create a new field of mind, brain and education, with educators and researchers expertly collaborating in integrating the variety of fields connecting mind, brain, and education in research, theory, and/or practice.