针对家庭暴力和虐待的儿童保护对策:机构间干预措施、模式与合作的范围审查

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Hannah Hale, Kelly Bracewell, Laura Bellussi, Ruth Jenkins, Joanne Alexander, John Devaney, Jane E. M. Callaghan
{"title":"针对家庭暴力和虐待的儿童保护对策:机构间干预措施、模式与合作的范围审查","authors":"Hannah Hale, Kelly Bracewell, Laura Bellussi, Ruth Jenkins, Joanne Alexander, John Devaney, Jane E. M. Callaghan","doi":"10.1007/s10896-024-00681-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>There is a growing acknowledgement that children are direct victims of domestic violence and abuse, and require support and protection in their own right. However, professional interventions designed to protect children may unintentionally further victimise parents, most often mothers. In response, a number of new interagency approaches have been developed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>Updating a previous review by Macvean et al. (<i>Australian Social Work,</i> <i>71</i>(2), 148–161, 2018), we report the findings of a scoping review of models of interagency working between child protection and either domestic abuse services or family law services, or all three services, to improve understanding of practices that may facilitate collaboration between child protection and other agencies in the context of domestic violence and abuse. We also consider the effectiveness of such approaches in improving the safety of child and adult victims.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A systematic search of all sources identified 4103 documents that were screened for inclusion. The outcome of this screening was the identification of thirteen papers or reports dated between 2018 and 2022 that comprised an evaluation of six models of interagency interventions. Nine publications originated in Australia, three in the UK and one in the USA. The most referenced model was Safe &amp; Together, primarily due to the number of publications from the same research team in Australia. None of the included studies reported the outcomes or impact for children and families.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>While there are a growing number of promising approaches identified, there is little evidence of effectiveness, or the views of child and adult family members about the acceptability and utility of such approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":48180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Violence","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Child Protection Response to Domestic Violence and Abuse: a Scoping Review of Interagency Interventions, Models and Collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Hale, Kelly Bracewell, Laura Bellussi, Ruth Jenkins, Joanne Alexander, John Devaney, Jane E. M. Callaghan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10896-024-00681-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>There is a growing acknowledgement that children are direct victims of domestic violence and abuse, and require support and protection in their own right. However, professional interventions designed to protect children may unintentionally further victimise parents, most often mothers. In response, a number of new interagency approaches have been developed.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Method</h3><p>Updating a previous review by Macvean et al. (<i>Australian Social Work,</i> <i>71</i>(2), 148–161, 2018), we report the findings of a scoping review of models of interagency working between child protection and either domestic abuse services or family law services, or all three services, to improve understanding of practices that may facilitate collaboration between child protection and other agencies in the context of domestic violence and abuse. We also consider the effectiveness of such approaches in improving the safety of child and adult victims.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>A systematic search of all sources identified 4103 documents that were screened for inclusion. The outcome of this screening was the identification of thirteen papers or reports dated between 2018 and 2022 that comprised an evaluation of six models of interagency interventions. Nine publications originated in Australia, three in the UK and one in the USA. The most referenced model was Safe &amp; Together, primarily due to the number of publications from the same research team in Australia. None of the included studies reported the outcomes or impact for children and families.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>While there are a growing number of promising approaches identified, there is little evidence of effectiveness, or the views of child and adult family members about the acceptability and utility of such approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Violence\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00681-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00681-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的越来越多的人认识到,儿童是家庭暴力和虐待的直接受害者,他们本身也需要支持和保护。然而,旨在保护儿童的专业干预措施可能会无意中进一步伤害父母,通常是母亲。方法更新Macvean等人之前的综述(《澳大利亚社会工作》,71(2),148-161,2018年),我们报告了对儿童保护和家庭虐待服务或家庭法服务,或所有三种服务之间机构间工作模式的范围综述结果,以增进对可能促进儿童保护和其他机构在家庭暴力和虐待背景下开展合作的实践的理解。我们还考虑了这些方法在改善儿童和成年受害者安全方面的有效性。筛选结果确定了 13 篇日期在 2018 年至 2022 年之间的论文或报告,其中包括对六种机构间干预模式的评估。其中九篇源自澳大利亚,三篇源自英国,一篇源自美国。被引用最多的模式是 "安全与amp; Together",这主要是由于来自澳大利亚同一研究团队的出版物数量较多。结论虽然有越来越多有前景的方法被发现,但几乎没有证据表明这些方法是有效的,也没有儿童和成人家庭成员对这些方法的可接受性和实用性的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Child Protection Response to Domestic Violence and Abuse: a Scoping Review of Interagency Interventions, Models and Collaboration

The Child Protection Response to Domestic Violence and Abuse: a Scoping Review of Interagency Interventions, Models and Collaboration

Purpose

There is a growing acknowledgement that children are direct victims of domestic violence and abuse, and require support and protection in their own right. However, professional interventions designed to protect children may unintentionally further victimise parents, most often mothers. In response, a number of new interagency approaches have been developed.

Method

Updating a previous review by Macvean et al. (Australian Social Work, 71(2), 148–161, 2018), we report the findings of a scoping review of models of interagency working between child protection and either domestic abuse services or family law services, or all three services, to improve understanding of practices that may facilitate collaboration between child protection and other agencies in the context of domestic violence and abuse. We also consider the effectiveness of such approaches in improving the safety of child and adult victims.

Results

A systematic search of all sources identified 4103 documents that were screened for inclusion. The outcome of this screening was the identification of thirteen papers or reports dated between 2018 and 2022 that comprised an evaluation of six models of interagency interventions. Nine publications originated in Australia, three in the UK and one in the USA. The most referenced model was Safe & Together, primarily due to the number of publications from the same research team in Australia. None of the included studies reported the outcomes or impact for children and families.

Conclusions

While there are a growing number of promising approaches identified, there is little evidence of effectiveness, or the views of child and adult family members about the acceptability and utility of such approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Violence (JOFV) is a peer-reviewed publication committed to the dissemination of rigorous research on preventing, ending, and ameliorating all forms of family violence.  JOFV welcomes scholarly articles related to the broad categories of child abuse and maltreatment, dating violence, domestic and partner violence, and elder abuse. Within these categories, JOFV emphasizes research on physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, and homicides that occur in families. Studies on families in all their various forms and diversities are welcome.  JOFV publishes studies using quantitative, qualitative, and/or mixed methods involving the collection of primary data. Rigorous systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and theoretical analyses are also welcome. To help advance scientific understandings of family violence, JOFV is especially interested in research using transdisciplinary perspectives and innovative research methods. Because family violence is a global problem requiring solutions from diverse disciplinary perspectives, JOFV strongly encourages submissions from scholars worldwide from all disciplines and backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信