拉昂的阿达尔贝罗致罗伯特国王的诗（1023-1025/7）：是反对克吕尼亚克改革的论述，还是对修道院虚伪的评论？

IF 0.7 1区历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES

Early Medieval Europe Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1111/emed.12699

Steven Vanderputten

{"title":"拉昂的阿达尔贝罗致罗伯特国王的诗（1023-1025/7）：是反对克吕尼亚克改革的论述，还是对修道院虚伪的评论？","authors":"Steven Vanderputten","doi":"10.1111/emed.12699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to nuance the traditional interpretation of Bishop Adalbero of Laon's satirical Carmen ad Rotbertum regem as a rebuttal of Cluniac reform and its disruptive effect on early eleventh-century society. Study of the text's literary antecedents reveals that its criticism was rooted in a tradition of commentaries on the conduct and attitudes of a much larger monastic cohort. Furthermore, comparison of its argument with evidence about the context and with a number of polemical statements regarding the relations between bishops and monastic leaders since the 990s indicates that the author's focus was on cautioning against abbots’ hypocrisy rather than against a programmatic reform.","PeriodicalId":44508,"journal":{"name":"Early Medieval Europe","volume":"32 2","pages":"159-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adalbero of Laon's Poem to King Robert (1023–1025/7): a discourse against Cluniac reform or a commentary on monastic hypocrisy?\",\"authors\":\"Steven Vanderputten\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emed.12699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to nuance the traditional interpretation of Bishop Adalbero of Laon's satirical Carmen ad Rotbertum regem as a rebuttal of Cluniac reform and its disruptive effect on early eleventh-century society. Study of the text's literary antecedents reveals that its criticism was rooted in a tradition of commentaries on the conduct and attitudes of a much larger monastic cohort. Furthermore, comparison of its argument with evidence about the context and with a number of polemical statements regarding the relations between bishops and monastic leaders since the 990s indicates that the author's focus was on cautioning against abbots’ hypocrisy rather than against a programmatic reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"159-183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12699\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Medieval Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在对拉昂主教阿达尔贝罗 (Adalbero of Laon) 的讽刺作品 Carmen ad Rotbertum regem 所作的传统解释进行细微调整，将其视为对克吕尼克改革及其对 11 世纪早期社会破坏性影响的反驳。对该书文学前身的研究表明，该书的批评根植于对更多修道士的行为和态度进行评论的传统。此外，将该书的论点与有关背景的证据以及自 990 年代以来有关主教与修道院领袖之间关系的一些论战声明进行比较后发现，作者的重点是告诫修道院院长的虚伪，而不是反对纲领性的改革。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Adalbero of Laon's Poem to King Robert (1023–1025/7): a discourse against Cluniac reform or a commentary on monastic hypocrisy?

The purpose of this paper is to nuance the traditional interpretation of Bishop Adalbero of Laon's satirical Carmen ad Rotbertum regem as a rebuttal of Cluniac reform and its disruptive effect on early eleventh-century society. Study of the text's literary antecedents reveals that its criticism was rooted in a tradition of commentaries on the conduct and attitudes of a much larger monastic cohort. Furthermore, comparison of its argument with evidence about the context and with a number of polemical statements regarding the relations between bishops and monastic leaders since the 990s indicates that the author's focus was on cautioning against abbots’ hypocrisy rather than against a programmatic reform.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Early Medieval Europe MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Early Medieval Europe provides an indispensable source of information and debate on the history of Europe from the later Roman Empire to the eleventh century. The journal is a thoroughly interdisciplinary forum, encouraging the discussion of archaeology, numismatics, palaeography, diplomatic, literature, onomastics, art history, linguistics and epigraphy, as well as more traditional historical approaches. It covers Europe in its entirety, including material on Iceland, Ireland, the British Isles, Scandinavia and Continental Europe (both west and east).