The role of perceptual similarities in determining the asymmetric mixed-category advantage.

Considering working memory capacity limitations, representing all relevant data simultaneously is unlikely. What remains unclear is why some items are better remembered than others when all data are equally relevant. While trying to answer this question, the literature has identified a pattern named the mixed-category benefit in which performance is enhanced when presenting stimuli from different categories as compared to presenting a similar number of items that all belong to just one category. Moreover, previous studies revealed an asymmetry in performance while mixing certain categories, suggesting that not all categories benefit equally from being mixed. In a series of three change-detection experiments, the present study investigated the role of low-level perceptual similarities between categories in determining the mixed-category asymmetric advantages. Our primary conclusion is that items' similarity at the perceptual level has a significant role in the asymmetric performance in the mixed-category phenomenon. We measured sensitivity (d') to detect a change between sample and test displays and found that the mixed-category advantage dropped when the mixed categories shared basic features. Furthermore, we found that sensitivity to novel items was impaired when presented with another category sharing its basic features. Finally, increasing the encoding interval improved performance for the novel items, but novel items' performance was still impaired when these items were mixed with another category that shared their basic features. Our findings highlight the significant role low-level similarities play in the asymmetric mixed-category performances, for both novel and familiar categories. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).