我应该多久冥想一次?一项随机试验研究了在冥想总量不变的情况下冥想频率的作用。

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Kevin M Riordan, Otto Simonsson, Corrina Frye, Nathan J Vack, Jane Sachs, Dan Fitch, Robin I Goldman, Evelyn S Chiang, Cortland J Dahl, Richard J Davidson, Simon B Goldberg
{"title":"我应该多久冥想一次?一项随机试验研究了在冥想总量不变的情况下冥想频率的作用。","authors":"Kevin M Riordan, Otto Simonsson, Corrina Frye, Nathan J Vack, Jane Sachs, Dan Fitch, Robin I Goldman, Evelyn S Chiang, Cortland J Dahl, Richard J Davidson, Simon B Goldberg","doi":"10.1037/cou0000725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meditation apps are the most commonly used mental health apps. However, the optimal dosing of app-delivered meditation practice has not been established. We examined whether the distribution of meditation practices across a day impacted outcomes in a distressed population. We investigated the effects of meditation practice frequency in a 2-week compassion-based meditation intervention delivered via the Healthy Minds Program app. Undergraduates with clinically elevated depression and/or anxiety (<i>N</i> = 351) were randomized to a massed (one 20-min meditation per day) or distributed condition (two 10-min meditations per day). Psychological distress (primary outcome; composite of depression and anxiety), experiential avoidance, fear of missing out, loneliness, and self-compassion were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Psychological distress, loneliness, and informal meditation practice were also assessed daily. Practice time and frequency were assessed using app data. Results support feasibility of the study design, success of the manipulation, and acceptability of the intervention. Pooled across conditions, participants exhibited pre-post improvements on all outcomes (absolute value of <i>ds</i> = 0.12-0.63, <i>p</i> ≤ .010) and trajectories of improvement on daily distress and loneliness (<i>p</i> ≤ .010). No between-group differences were observed on changes in pre-post or daily measures (<i>ps</i> = .158-.729). When total amount of meditation practice per day is held constant, the distribution of practice may not influence outcomes for distressed beginners. Although only a first test of dose frequency effects, findings support flexibility in the distribution of meditation throughout the day, which may increase accessibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"71 2","pages":"104-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10883600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How often should I meditate? A randomized trial examining the role of meditation frequency when total amount of meditation is held constant.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin M Riordan, Otto Simonsson, Corrina Frye, Nathan J Vack, Jane Sachs, Dan Fitch, Robin I Goldman, Evelyn S Chiang, Cortland J Dahl, Richard J Davidson, Simon B Goldberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cou0000725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Meditation apps are the most commonly used mental health apps. However, the optimal dosing of app-delivered meditation practice has not been established. We examined whether the distribution of meditation practices across a day impacted outcomes in a distressed population. We investigated the effects of meditation practice frequency in a 2-week compassion-based meditation intervention delivered via the Healthy Minds Program app. Undergraduates with clinically elevated depression and/or anxiety (<i>N</i> = 351) were randomized to a massed (one 20-min meditation per day) or distributed condition (two 10-min meditations per day). Psychological distress (primary outcome; composite of depression and anxiety), experiential avoidance, fear of missing out, loneliness, and self-compassion were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Psychological distress, loneliness, and informal meditation practice were also assessed daily. Practice time and frequency were assessed using app data. Results support feasibility of the study design, success of the manipulation, and acceptability of the intervention. Pooled across conditions, participants exhibited pre-post improvements on all outcomes (absolute value of <i>ds</i> = 0.12-0.63, <i>p</i> ≤ .010) and trajectories of improvement on daily distress and loneliness (<i>p</i> ≤ .010). No between-group differences were observed on changes in pre-post or daily measures (<i>ps</i> = .158-.729). When total amount of meditation practice per day is held constant, the distribution of practice may not influence outcomes for distressed beginners. Although only a first test of dose frequency effects, findings support flexibility in the distribution of meditation throughout the day, which may increase accessibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"volume\":\"71 2\",\"pages\":\"104-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10883600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000725\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000725","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冥想应用程序是最常用的心理健康应用程序。然而,应用程序提供的最佳冥想练习剂量尚未确定。我们研究了冥想练习在一天中的分布是否会影响苦恼人群的结果。在通过 Healthy Minds Program 应用程序进行的为期两周的慈悲冥想干预中,我们研究了冥想练习频率的影响。患有临床抑郁和/或焦虑症的本科生(351 人)被随机分配到集中式(每天一次 20 分钟的冥想)或分散式(每天两次 10 分钟的冥想)条件下。干预前后对心理困扰(主要结果;抑郁和焦虑的综合)、体验性回避、害怕错过、孤独感和自我同情进行了评估。每天还对心理困扰、孤独感和非正式冥想练习进行评估。使用应用程序数据对练习时间和频率进行了评估。结果证明了研究设计的可行性、操作的成功性和干预的可接受性。对所有条件进行汇总后,参与者在所有结果上都表现出了前后期的改善(ds 的绝对值 = 0.12-0.63,p ≤ .010),在日常苦恼和孤独感上也表现出了改善轨迹(p ≤ .010)。在前后期或日常测量的变化方面,没有观察到组间差异(ps = .158-.729)。当每天冥想练习的总量保持不变时,练习的分布可能不会影响苦恼初学者的结果。虽然这只是对剂量频率效应的首次测试,但研究结果支持全天冥想的灵活分配,这可能会提高冥想的可及性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How often should I meditate? A randomized trial examining the role of meditation frequency when total amount of meditation is held constant.

Meditation apps are the most commonly used mental health apps. However, the optimal dosing of app-delivered meditation practice has not been established. We examined whether the distribution of meditation practices across a day impacted outcomes in a distressed population. We investigated the effects of meditation practice frequency in a 2-week compassion-based meditation intervention delivered via the Healthy Minds Program app. Undergraduates with clinically elevated depression and/or anxiety (N = 351) were randomized to a massed (one 20-min meditation per day) or distributed condition (two 10-min meditations per day). Psychological distress (primary outcome; composite of depression and anxiety), experiential avoidance, fear of missing out, loneliness, and self-compassion were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Psychological distress, loneliness, and informal meditation practice were also assessed daily. Practice time and frequency were assessed using app data. Results support feasibility of the study design, success of the manipulation, and acceptability of the intervention. Pooled across conditions, participants exhibited pre-post improvements on all outcomes (absolute value of ds = 0.12-0.63, p ≤ .010) and trajectories of improvement on daily distress and loneliness (p ≤ .010). No between-group differences were observed on changes in pre-post or daily measures (ps = .158-.729). When total amount of meditation practice per day is held constant, the distribution of practice may not influence outcomes for distressed beginners. Although only a first test of dose frequency effects, findings support flexibility in the distribution of meditation throughout the day, which may increase accessibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信