{"title":"放射学出版物中的宣传用语:越来越多地使用 \"优秀\"、\"良好\"、\"有前途\"、\"稳健 \"和 \"独特 \"等词语。","authors":"Thomas Christian Kwee, Robert Michael Kwee","doi":"10.1055/a-2224-9357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong> To investigate if radiology researchers are increasingly promoting their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> This study included all articles that were published in 14 general radiology journals between 2003 and 2022. The title and abstract of each article were assessed for the presence of positive, negative, neutral, and random words, according to predefined sets of words for each category. Usage of positive, negative, neutral, and random words was calculated for each year and corrected for the total number of articles in each year. Temporal trends between 2002 and 2023 and the relationship between positive word usage and journal impact factor (IF) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Positive word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.895, P< 0.001) and neutral word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.463, P = 0.005) showed significant upward temporal trends. Negative word usage and random word usage did not show any significant temporal trends. Five positive words showed significantly increased usage over time and were present in more than 1 % of titles/abstracts in at least one year: \"excellent\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.800, P< 0.001), \"favorable\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.547, P< 0.001), \"promising\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.607, P< 0.001), \"robust\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.737, P< 0.001), and \"unique\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.747, P< 0.001). There was no significant association between positive word usage and journal IF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Radiology researchers appear to increasingly promote their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications over the past two decades.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong> · Positive word usage in titles/abstracts has strongly increased between 2003-2022. · \"Excellent\", \"favorable\", \"promising\", \"robust\", and \"unique\" were most often used. · This trend occurred in all general radiology journals, regardless of impact factor.</p><p><strong>Citation format: </strong>· Kwee T, Kwee R. Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of \"excellent\", \"favorable\", \"promising\", \"robust\", and \"unique\". Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 945 - 955.</p>","PeriodicalId":21490,"journal":{"name":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","volume":" ","pages":"945-955"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of \\\"excellent\\\", \\\"favorable\\\", \\\"promising\\\", \\\"robust\\\", and \\\"unique\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Christian Kwee, Robert Michael Kwee\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2224-9357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong> To investigate if radiology researchers are increasingly promoting their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> This study included all articles that were published in 14 general radiology journals between 2003 and 2022. The title and abstract of each article were assessed for the presence of positive, negative, neutral, and random words, according to predefined sets of words for each category. Usage of positive, negative, neutral, and random words was calculated for each year and corrected for the total number of articles in each year. Temporal trends between 2002 and 2023 and the relationship between positive word usage and journal impact factor (IF) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Positive word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.895, P< 0.001) and neutral word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.463, P = 0.005) showed significant upward temporal trends. Negative word usage and random word usage did not show any significant temporal trends. Five positive words showed significantly increased usage over time and were present in more than 1 % of titles/abstracts in at least one year: \\\"excellent\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.800, P< 0.001), \\\"favorable\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.547, P< 0.001), \\\"promising\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.607, P< 0.001), \\\"robust\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.737, P< 0.001), and \\\"unique\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.747, P< 0.001). There was no significant association between positive word usage and journal IF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Radiology researchers appear to increasingly promote their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications over the past two decades.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong> · Positive word usage in titles/abstracts has strongly increased between 2003-2022. · \\\"Excellent\\\", \\\"favorable\\\", \\\"promising\\\", \\\"robust\\\", and \\\"unique\\\" were most often used. · This trend occurred in all general radiology journals, regardless of impact factor.</p><p><strong>Citation format: </strong>· Kwee T, Kwee R. Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of \\\"excellent\\\", \\\"favorable\\\", \\\"promising\\\", \\\"robust\\\", and \\\"unique\\\". Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 945 - 955.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"945-955\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2224-9357\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2224-9357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of "excellent", "favorable", "promising", "robust", and "unique".
Purpose: To investigate if radiology researchers are increasingly promoting their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications.
Materials and methods: This study included all articles that were published in 14 general radiology journals between 2003 and 2022. The title and abstract of each article were assessed for the presence of positive, negative, neutral, and random words, according to predefined sets of words for each category. Usage of positive, negative, neutral, and random words was calculated for each year and corrected for the total number of articles in each year. Temporal trends between 2002 and 2023 and the relationship between positive word usage and journal impact factor (IF) were assessed.
Results: Positive word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.895, P< 0.001) and neutral word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.463, P = 0.005) showed significant upward temporal trends. Negative word usage and random word usage did not show any significant temporal trends. Five positive words showed significantly increased usage over time and were present in more than 1 % of titles/abstracts in at least one year: "excellent" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.800, P< 0.001), "favorable" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.547, P< 0.001), "promising" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.607, P< 0.001), "robust" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.737, P< 0.001), and "unique" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.747, P< 0.001). There was no significant association between positive word usage and journal IF.
Conclusion: Radiology researchers appear to increasingly promote their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications over the past two decades.
Key points: · Positive word usage in titles/abstracts has strongly increased between 2003-2022. · "Excellent", "favorable", "promising", "robust", and "unique" were most often used. · This trend occurred in all general radiology journals, regardless of impact factor.
Citation format: · Kwee T, Kwee R. Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of "excellent", "favorable", "promising", "robust", and "unique". Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 945 - 955.
期刊介绍:
Die RöFo veröffentlicht Originalarbeiten, Übersichtsartikel und Fallberichte aus dem Bereich der Radiologie und den weiteren bildgebenden Verfahren in der Medizin. Es dürfen nur Arbeiten eingereicht werden, die noch nicht veröffentlicht sind und die auch nicht gleichzeitig einer anderen Zeitschrift zur Veröffentlichung angeboten wurden. Alle eingereichten Beiträge unterliegen einer sorgfältigen fachlichen Begutachtung.
Gegründet 1896 – nur knapp 1 Jahr nach der Entdeckung der Röntgenstrahlen durch C.W. Röntgen – blickt die RöFo auf über 100 Jahre Erfahrung als wichtigstes Publikationsmedium in der deutschsprachigen Radiologie zurück. Sie ist damit die älteste radiologische Fachzeitschrift und schafft es erfolgreich, lange Kontinuität mit dem Anspruch an wissenschaftliches Publizieren auf internationalem Niveau zu verbinden. Durch ihren zentralen Platz im Verlagsprogramm stellte die RöFo die Basis für das heute umfassende und erfolgreiche Radiologie-Medienangebot im Georg Thieme Verlag.
Besonders eng verbunden ist die RöFo mit der Geschichte der Röntgengesellschaften in Deutschland und Österreich. Sie ist offizielles Organ von DRG und ÖRG und die Mitglieder der Fachgesellschaften erhalten die Zeitschrift im Rahmen ihrer Mitgliedschaft. Mit ihrem wissenschaftlichen Kernteil und dem eigenen Mitteilungsteil der Fachgesellschaften bietet die RöFo Monat für Monat ein Forum für den Austausch von Inhalten und Botschaften der radiologischen Community im deutschsprachigen Raum.