Zackary Anderson, Mohammed Ahsan, Carlos Aguirre, Michele Ramirez, Keegan Plowman
{"title":"快讯:血栓性疾病的住院检查;血液科会诊能否避免不必要的检查?","authors":"Zackary Anderson, Mohammed Ahsan, Carlos Aguirre, Michele Ramirez, Keegan Plowman","doi":"10.1177/10815589241235663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypercoagulable disorders are best described as a group of acquired and hereditary conditions that increase the risk for the development of thrombi within veins or arteries. In the setting of an unprovoked venous thromboembolism, common practice in the inpatient setting has been further investigation via a thrombophilia workup to establish an underlying cause. Current Hematology-Oncology guidelines argue against inpatient workup as the results rarely influence inpatient management. Following American Society of Hematology guidelines (Middledorp), the current study found that only 15% (11/72) of patients met appropriate criteria for thrombophilia testing. There was no relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and diagnosis of thrombophilia or initiation of anticoagulation. There was a relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and Hematology-Oncology consultation. This demonstrates the need for expert consultation if thrombophilia testing is being considered. The current study provides more evidence that a strong recommendation against inpatient testing should be made as testing does not aid in diagnosis or change management and is an overutilization of healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":16112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"392-395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient thrombophilia workup; does hematology consult prevent unnecessary testing?\",\"authors\":\"Zackary Anderson, Mohammed Ahsan, Carlos Aguirre, Michele Ramirez, Keegan Plowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10815589241235663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hypercoagulable disorders are best described as a group of acquired and hereditary conditions that increase the risk for the development of thrombi within veins or arteries. In the setting of an unprovoked venous thromboembolism, common practice in the inpatient setting has been further investigation via a thrombophilia workup to establish an underlying cause. Current Hematology-Oncology guidelines argue against inpatient workup as the results rarely influence inpatient management. Following American Society of Hematology guidelines (Middledorp), the current study found that only 15% (11/72) of patients met appropriate criteria for thrombophilia testing. There was no relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and diagnosis of thrombophilia or initiation of anticoagulation. There was a relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and Hematology-Oncology consultation. This demonstrates the need for expert consultation if thrombophilia testing is being considered. The current study provides more evidence that a strong recommendation against inpatient testing should be made as testing does not aid in diagnosis or change management and is an overutilization of healthcare resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"392-395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589241235663\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589241235663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inpatient thrombophilia workup; does hematology consult prevent unnecessary testing?
Hypercoagulable disorders are best described as a group of acquired and hereditary conditions that increase the risk for the development of thrombi within veins or arteries. In the setting of an unprovoked venous thromboembolism, common practice in the inpatient setting has been further investigation via a thrombophilia workup to establish an underlying cause. Current Hematology-Oncology guidelines argue against inpatient workup as the results rarely influence inpatient management. Following American Society of Hematology guidelines (Middledorp), the current study found that only 15% (11/72) of patients met appropriate criteria for thrombophilia testing. There was no relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and diagnosis of thrombophilia or initiation of anticoagulation. There was a relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and Hematology-Oncology consultation. This demonstrates the need for expert consultation if thrombophilia testing is being considered. The current study provides more evidence that a strong recommendation against inpatient testing should be made as testing does not aid in diagnosis or change management and is an overutilization of healthcare resources.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research.
JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.