干眼症患者深度学习辅助眨眼分析系统与 Lipiview 干涉仪的比较:一项横断面研究。

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yueping Ren, Han Wen, Furong Bai, Binge Huang, Zhenzhen Wang, Shuwen Zhang, Yaojia Pu, Zhenmin Le, Xianhui Gong, Lei Wang, Wei Chen, Qinxiang Zheng
{"title":"干眼症患者深度学习辅助眨眼分析系统与 Lipiview 干涉仪的比较:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Yueping Ren, Han Wen, Furong Bai, Binge Huang, Zhenzhen Wang, Shuwen Zhang, Yaojia Pu, Zhenmin Le, Xianhui Gong, Lei Wang, Wei Chen, Qinxiang Zheng","doi":"10.1186/s40662-024-00373-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abnormal blinking pattern is associated with ocular surface diseases. However, blink is difficult to analyze due to the rapid movement of eyelids. Deep learning machine (DLM) has been proposed as an optional tool for blinking analysis, but its clinical practicability still needs to be proven. Therefore, the study aims to compare the DLM-assisted Keratograph 5M (K5M) as a novel method with the currently available Lipiview in the clinic and assess whether blinking parameters can be applied in the diagnosis of dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five DED participants and 35 normal subjects were recruited in this cross-sectional study. DED questionnaire and ocular surface signs were evaluated. Blinking parameters including number of blinks, number of incomplete blinking (IB), and IB rate were collected from the blinking videos recorded by the K5M and Lipiview. Blinking parameters were individually collected from the DLM analyzed K5M videos and Lipiview generated results. The agreement and consistency of blinking parameters were compared between the two devices. The association of blinking parameters to DED symptoms and signs were evaluated via heatmap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 140 eyes of 70 participants were included in this study. Lipiview presented a higher number of IB and IB rate than those from DLM-assisted K5M (P ≤ 0.006). DLM-assisted K5M captured significant differences in number of blinks, number of IB and IB rate between DED and normal subjects (P ≤ 0.035). In all three parameters, DLM-assisted K5M also showed a better consistency in repeated measurements than Lipiview with higher intraclass correlation coefficients (number of blinks: 0.841 versus 0.665; number of IB: 0.750 versus 0.564; IB rate: 0.633 versus 0.589). More correlations between blinking parameters and DED symptoms and signs were found by DLM-assisted K5M. Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the number of IB from K5M exhibiting the highest area under curve of 0.773.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DLM-assisted K5M is a useful tool to analyze blinking videos and detect abnormal blinking patterns, especially in distinguishing DED patients from normal subjects. Large sample investigations are therefore warranted to assess its clinical utility before implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12194,"journal":{"name":"Eye and Vision","volume":"11 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10875838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of deep learning-assisted blinking analysis system and Lipiview interferometer in dry eye patients: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Yueping Ren, Han Wen, Furong Bai, Binge Huang, Zhenzhen Wang, Shuwen Zhang, Yaojia Pu, Zhenmin Le, Xianhui Gong, Lei Wang, Wei Chen, Qinxiang Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40662-024-00373-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abnormal blinking pattern is associated with ocular surface diseases. However, blink is difficult to analyze due to the rapid movement of eyelids. Deep learning machine (DLM) has been proposed as an optional tool for blinking analysis, but its clinical practicability still needs to be proven. Therefore, the study aims to compare the DLM-assisted Keratograph 5M (K5M) as a novel method with the currently available Lipiview in the clinic and assess whether blinking parameters can be applied in the diagnosis of dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five DED participants and 35 normal subjects were recruited in this cross-sectional study. DED questionnaire and ocular surface signs were evaluated. Blinking parameters including number of blinks, number of incomplete blinking (IB), and IB rate were collected from the blinking videos recorded by the K5M and Lipiview. Blinking parameters were individually collected from the DLM analyzed K5M videos and Lipiview generated results. The agreement and consistency of blinking parameters were compared between the two devices. The association of blinking parameters to DED symptoms and signs were evaluated via heatmap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 140 eyes of 70 participants were included in this study. Lipiview presented a higher number of IB and IB rate than those from DLM-assisted K5M (P ≤ 0.006). DLM-assisted K5M captured significant differences in number of blinks, number of IB and IB rate between DED and normal subjects (P ≤ 0.035). In all three parameters, DLM-assisted K5M also showed a better consistency in repeated measurements than Lipiview with higher intraclass correlation coefficients (number of blinks: 0.841 versus 0.665; number of IB: 0.750 versus 0.564; IB rate: 0.633 versus 0.589). More correlations between blinking parameters and DED symptoms and signs were found by DLM-assisted K5M. Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the number of IB from K5M exhibiting the highest area under curve of 0.773.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DLM-assisted K5M is a useful tool to analyze blinking videos and detect abnormal blinking patterns, especially in distinguishing DED patients from normal subjects. Large sample investigations are therefore warranted to assess its clinical utility before implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye and Vision\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10875838/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye and Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-024-00373-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-024-00373-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:异常眨眼模式与眼表疾病有关。然而,由于眼睑的快速运动,眨眼很难分析。深度学习机器(DLM)已被提出作为眨眼分析的可选工具,但其临床实用性仍有待验证。因此,本研究旨在将 DLM 辅助的 Keratograph 5M (K5M) 作为一种新方法与目前临床上可用的 Lipiview 进行比较,并评估眨眼参数是否可用于干眼症(DED)的诊断:这项横断面研究招募了 35 名干眼症患者和 35 名正常人。对 DED 问卷和眼表体征进行了评估。从 K5M 和 Lipiview 记录的眨眼视频中收集眨眼参数,包括眨眼次数、不完全眨眼(IB)次数和 IB 率。眨眼参数分别从 DLM 分析的 K5M 视频和 Lipiview 生成的结果中收集。比较了两种设备之间眨眼参数的一致性。通过热图评估眨眼参数与 DED 症状和体征的关联:本研究共纳入了 70 名参与者的 140 只眼睛。Lipiview 的 IB 数和 IB 率均高于 DLM 辅助的 K5M(P ≤ 0.006)。DLM 辅助 K5M 在眨眼次数、IB 次数和 IB 率方面捕捉到了 DED 与正常受试者之间的显著差异(P ≤ 0.035)。在所有三个参数中,DLM 辅助 K5M 在重复测量中也比 Lipiview 表现出更好的一致性,具有更高的类内相关系数(眨眼次数:0.841 对 0.035):眨眼次数:0.841 对 0.665;IB 次数:0.750 对 0.564;IB 率:0.633 对 0.564:0.633 对 0.589)。DLM 辅助 K5M 发现眨眼参数与 DED 症状和体征之间存在更多相关性。此外,接收器操作特征分析显示,K5M 的 IB 数量曲线下面积最高,为 0.773:DLM 辅助 K5M 是分析眨眼视频和检测异常眨眼模式的有用工具,特别是在区分 DED 患者和正常人方面。因此,在实施之前,有必要进行大样本调查,以评估其临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of deep learning-assisted blinking analysis system and Lipiview interferometer in dry eye patients: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Abnormal blinking pattern is associated with ocular surface diseases. However, blink is difficult to analyze due to the rapid movement of eyelids. Deep learning machine (DLM) has been proposed as an optional tool for blinking analysis, but its clinical practicability still needs to be proven. Therefore, the study aims to compare the DLM-assisted Keratograph 5M (K5M) as a novel method with the currently available Lipiview in the clinic and assess whether blinking parameters can be applied in the diagnosis of dry eye disease (DED).

Methods: Thirty-five DED participants and 35 normal subjects were recruited in this cross-sectional study. DED questionnaire and ocular surface signs were evaluated. Blinking parameters including number of blinks, number of incomplete blinking (IB), and IB rate were collected from the blinking videos recorded by the K5M and Lipiview. Blinking parameters were individually collected from the DLM analyzed K5M videos and Lipiview generated results. The agreement and consistency of blinking parameters were compared between the two devices. The association of blinking parameters to DED symptoms and signs were evaluated via heatmap.

Results: In total, 140 eyes of 70 participants were included in this study. Lipiview presented a higher number of IB and IB rate than those from DLM-assisted K5M (P ≤ 0.006). DLM-assisted K5M captured significant differences in number of blinks, number of IB and IB rate between DED and normal subjects (P ≤ 0.035). In all three parameters, DLM-assisted K5M also showed a better consistency in repeated measurements than Lipiview with higher intraclass correlation coefficients (number of blinks: 0.841 versus 0.665; number of IB: 0.750 versus 0.564; IB rate: 0.633 versus 0.589). More correlations between blinking parameters and DED symptoms and signs were found by DLM-assisted K5M. Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the number of IB from K5M exhibiting the highest area under curve of 0.773.

Conclusions: DLM-assisted K5M is a useful tool to analyze blinking videos and detect abnormal blinking patterns, especially in distinguishing DED patients from normal subjects. Large sample investigations are therefore warranted to assess its clinical utility before implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eye and Vision
Eye and Vision OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye and Vision is an open access, peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. It welcomes research articles, reviews, methodologies, commentaries, case reports, perspectives and short reports encompassing all aspects of eye and vision. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: current developments of theoretical, experimental and clinical investigations in ophthalmology, optometry and vision science which focus on novel and high-impact findings on central issues pertaining to biology, pathophysiology and etiology of eye diseases as well as advances in diagnostic techniques, surgical treatment, instrument updates, the latest drug findings, results of clinical trials and research findings. It aims to provide ophthalmologists and visual science specialists with the latest developments in theoretical, experimental and clinical investigations in eye and vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信