在不同储存和处理条件下检测渗出肿瘤细胞。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Diane M. Libert MD, Yili Zhu PhD, Aihui Wang ScM, Grace M. Allard BS, Alarice Cheng-Yi Lowe MD
{"title":"在不同储存和处理条件下检测渗出肿瘤细胞。","authors":"Diane M. Libert MD,&nbsp;Yili Zhu PhD,&nbsp;Aihui Wang ScM,&nbsp;Grace M. Allard BS,&nbsp;Alarice Cheng-Yi Lowe MD","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) shed into blood provide prognostic and/or predictive information. Previously, the authors established an assay to detect carcinoma cells from pleural fluid, termed effusion tumor cells (ETCs), by employing an immunofluorescence-based CTC-identification platform (RareCyte) on air-dried unstained ThinPrep (TP) slides. To facilitate clinical integration, they evaluated different slide processing and storage conditions, hypothesizing that alternative comparable conditions for ETC detection exist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The authors enumerated ETCs on RareCyte, using morphology and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cutoffs of &gt;100 arbitrary units (a.u.) for epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and &lt;100 a.u. for CD45. They analyzed malignant pleural fluid from three patients under seven processing and/or staining conditions, three patients after short-term storage under three conditions, and seven samples following long-term storage at –80°C. MFI values of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol, cytokeratin, CD45, and EpCAM were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>ETCs were detected in all conditions. Among the different processing conditions tested, the ethanol-fixed, unstained TP was most similar to the previously established air-dried, unstained TP protocol. All smears and Pap-stained TPs had significantly different marker MFIs from the established condition. After short-term storage, the established condition showed comparable results, but ethanol-fixed and Pap-stained slides showed significant differences. ETCs were detectable after long-term storage at –80°C in comparable numbers to freshly prepared slides, but most marker MFIs were significantly different.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>It is possible to detect ETCs under different processing and storage conditions, lending promise to the application of this method in broader settings. Because of decreased immunofluorescence-signature distinctions between cells, morphology may need to play a larger role.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":"132 5","pages":"297-308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of effusion tumor cells under different storage and processing conditions\",\"authors\":\"Diane M. Libert MD,&nbsp;Yili Zhu PhD,&nbsp;Aihui Wang ScM,&nbsp;Grace M. Allard BS,&nbsp;Alarice Cheng-Yi Lowe MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncy.22803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) shed into blood provide prognostic and/or predictive information. Previously, the authors established an assay to detect carcinoma cells from pleural fluid, termed effusion tumor cells (ETCs), by employing an immunofluorescence-based CTC-identification platform (RareCyte) on air-dried unstained ThinPrep (TP) slides. To facilitate clinical integration, they evaluated different slide processing and storage conditions, hypothesizing that alternative comparable conditions for ETC detection exist.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The authors enumerated ETCs on RareCyte, using morphology and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cutoffs of &gt;100 arbitrary units (a.u.) for epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and &lt;100 a.u. for CD45. They analyzed malignant pleural fluid from three patients under seven processing and/or staining conditions, three patients after short-term storage under three conditions, and seven samples following long-term storage at –80°C. MFI values of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol, cytokeratin, CD45, and EpCAM were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>ETCs were detected in all conditions. Among the different processing conditions tested, the ethanol-fixed, unstained TP was most similar to the previously established air-dried, unstained TP protocol. All smears and Pap-stained TPs had significantly different marker MFIs from the established condition. After short-term storage, the established condition showed comparable results, but ethanol-fixed and Pap-stained slides showed significant differences. ETCs were detectable after long-term storage at –80°C in comparable numbers to freshly prepared slides, but most marker MFIs were significantly different.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>It is possible to detect ETCs under different processing and storage conditions, lending promise to the application of this method in broader settings. Because of decreased immunofluorescence-signature distinctions between cells, morphology may need to play a larger role.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\"132 5\",\"pages\":\"297-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncy.22803\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncy.22803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脱落到血液中的循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)可提供预后和/或预测信息。此前,作者利用基于免疫荧光的 CTC 识别平台(RareCyte),在风干未染色的 ThinPrep(TP)载玻片上建立了一种检测胸腔积液中癌细胞(称为渗出肿瘤细胞(ETC))的方法。为了便于临床整合,他们评估了不同的玻片处理和储存条件,假设存在可用于 ETC 检测的替代性可比条件:方法:作者在 RareCyte 上列举了 ETC,使用形态学和上皮细胞粘附分子(EpCAM)的平均荧光强度(MFI)截止值大于 100 个任意单位(a.u.)和结果:在所有条件下都检测到了 ETC。在测试的不同处理条件中,乙醇固定、未染色的 TP 与之前确定的风干、未染色的 TP 方案最为相似。所有涂片和巴氏染色 TP 的标记物 MFI 都与既定条件有显著差异。短期储存后,既定条件显示出相似的结果,但乙醇固定和巴氏染色切片显示出显著差异。在-80°C长期储存后,可检测到ETC,其数量与新鲜制备的切片相当,但大多数标记物的MFI有显著差异:结论:在不同的处理和储存条件下都有可能检测到 ETC,这为该方法在更广泛的环境中应用提供了希望。由于细胞间的免疫荧光标记区分度降低,形态学可能需要发挥更大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of effusion tumor cells under different storage and processing conditions

Background

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) shed into blood provide prognostic and/or predictive information. Previously, the authors established an assay to detect carcinoma cells from pleural fluid, termed effusion tumor cells (ETCs), by employing an immunofluorescence-based CTC-identification platform (RareCyte) on air-dried unstained ThinPrep (TP) slides. To facilitate clinical integration, they evaluated different slide processing and storage conditions, hypothesizing that alternative comparable conditions for ETC detection exist.

Methods

The authors enumerated ETCs on RareCyte, using morphology and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cutoffs of >100 arbitrary units (a.u.) for epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and <100 a.u. for CD45. They analyzed malignant pleural fluid from three patients under seven processing and/or staining conditions, three patients after short-term storage under three conditions, and seven samples following long-term storage at –80°C. MFI values of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol, cytokeratin, CD45, and EpCAM were compared.

Results

ETCs were detected in all conditions. Among the different processing conditions tested, the ethanol-fixed, unstained TP was most similar to the previously established air-dried, unstained TP protocol. All smears and Pap-stained TPs had significantly different marker MFIs from the established condition. After short-term storage, the established condition showed comparable results, but ethanol-fixed and Pap-stained slides showed significant differences. ETCs were detectable after long-term storage at –80°C in comparable numbers to freshly prepared slides, but most marker MFIs were significantly different.

Conclusions

It is possible to detect ETCs under different processing and storage conditions, lending promise to the application of this method in broader settings. Because of decreased immunofluorescence-signature distinctions between cells, morphology may need to play a larger role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Cytopathology
Cancer Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
17.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Cytopathology provides a unique forum for interaction and dissemination of original research and educational information relevant to the practice of cytopathology and its related oncologic disciplines. The journal strives to have a positive effect on cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and cure by the publication of high-quality content. The mission of Cancer Cytopathology is to present and inform readers of new applications, technological advances, cutting-edge research, novel applications of molecular techniques, and relevant review articles related to cytopathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信