{"title":"驱动蛋白-3 马达的化学机械耦合模型","authors":"Ping Xie","doi":"10.1007/s12195-024-00795-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Kinesin-3 motor, which is in the monomeric and inactive form in solution, after cargo-induced dimerization can step on microtubules towards the plus end with a high velocity and a supperprocessivity, which is responsible for transporting the cargo in axons and dendrites. The kinesin-3 motor has a large initial landing rate to microtubules and spends the majority of its stepping cycle in a one-head-bound state. Under the load the kinesin-3 motor can dissociate more readily than the kinesin-1 motor.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>To understand the physical origin of the peculiar features for the kinesin-3 motor, a model is presented here for its chemomechanical coupling. Based on the model the dynamics of the motor under no load, under the ramping load and under the constant load is studied analytically.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The theoretical results explain well the available experimental data under no load and under the ramping load. For comparison, the corresponding available experimental data for the kinesin-1 motor under the ramping load are also explained. The predicted results of the velocity, dissociation rate and run length versus the constant load for the kinesin-3 motor are provided.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The study has strong implications for the chemomechanical coupling mechanism of the kinesin-3 dimer. The origin of the kinesin-3 dimer in the predominant one-head-bound state is due to the fact that the rate of ATP transition to ADP in the trailing head is much larger than that of ADP release from the MT-bound head. The study shows that the kinesin-3 ADP-head has an evidently longer interaction distance with microtubule than the kinesin-1 ADP-head, explaining why in the initial ADP state the kinesin-3 motor has the much larger landing rate than the kinesin-1 motor and why under the load the kinesin-3 motor can dissociate more readily than the kinesin-1 motor.</p>","PeriodicalId":9687,"journal":{"name":"Cellular and molecular bioengineering","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Model for Chemomechanical Coupling of Kinesin-3 Motor\",\"authors\":\"Ping Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12195-024-00795-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction</h3><p>Kinesin-3 motor, which is in the monomeric and inactive form in solution, after cargo-induced dimerization can step on microtubules towards the plus end with a high velocity and a supperprocessivity, which is responsible for transporting the cargo in axons and dendrites. The kinesin-3 motor has a large initial landing rate to microtubules and spends the majority of its stepping cycle in a one-head-bound state. Under the load the kinesin-3 motor can dissociate more readily than the kinesin-1 motor.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>To understand the physical origin of the peculiar features for the kinesin-3 motor, a model is presented here for its chemomechanical coupling. Based on the model the dynamics of the motor under no load, under the ramping load and under the constant load is studied analytically.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The theoretical results explain well the available experimental data under no load and under the ramping load. For comparison, the corresponding available experimental data for the kinesin-1 motor under the ramping load are also explained. The predicted results of the velocity, dissociation rate and run length versus the constant load for the kinesin-3 motor are provided.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The study has strong implications for the chemomechanical coupling mechanism of the kinesin-3 dimer. The origin of the kinesin-3 dimer in the predominant one-head-bound state is due to the fact that the rate of ATP transition to ADP in the trailing head is much larger than that of ADP release from the MT-bound head. The study shows that the kinesin-3 ADP-head has an evidently longer interaction distance with microtubule than the kinesin-1 ADP-head, explaining why in the initial ADP state the kinesin-3 motor has the much larger landing rate than the kinesin-1 motor and why under the load the kinesin-3 motor can dissociate more readily than the kinesin-1 motor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellular and molecular bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellular and molecular bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-024-00795-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellular and molecular bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-024-00795-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Model for Chemomechanical Coupling of Kinesin-3 Motor
Introduction
Kinesin-3 motor, which is in the monomeric and inactive form in solution, after cargo-induced dimerization can step on microtubules towards the plus end with a high velocity and a supperprocessivity, which is responsible for transporting the cargo in axons and dendrites. The kinesin-3 motor has a large initial landing rate to microtubules and spends the majority of its stepping cycle in a one-head-bound state. Under the load the kinesin-3 motor can dissociate more readily than the kinesin-1 motor.
Methods
To understand the physical origin of the peculiar features for the kinesin-3 motor, a model is presented here for its chemomechanical coupling. Based on the model the dynamics of the motor under no load, under the ramping load and under the constant load is studied analytically.
Results
The theoretical results explain well the available experimental data under no load and under the ramping load. For comparison, the corresponding available experimental data for the kinesin-1 motor under the ramping load are also explained. The predicted results of the velocity, dissociation rate and run length versus the constant load for the kinesin-3 motor are provided.
Conclusions
The study has strong implications for the chemomechanical coupling mechanism of the kinesin-3 dimer. The origin of the kinesin-3 dimer in the predominant one-head-bound state is due to the fact that the rate of ATP transition to ADP in the trailing head is much larger than that of ADP release from the MT-bound head. The study shows that the kinesin-3 ADP-head has an evidently longer interaction distance with microtubule than the kinesin-1 ADP-head, explaining why in the initial ADP state the kinesin-3 motor has the much larger landing rate than the kinesin-1 motor and why under the load the kinesin-3 motor can dissociate more readily than the kinesin-1 motor.
期刊介绍:
The field of cellular and molecular bioengineering seeks to understand, so that we may ultimately control, the mechanical, chemical, and electrical processes of the cell. A key challenge in improving human health is to understand how cellular behavior arises from molecular-level interactions. CMBE, an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishes original research and review papers in the following seven general areas:
Molecular: DNA-protein/RNA-protein interactions, protein folding and function, protein-protein and receptor-ligand interactions, lipids, polysaccharides, molecular motors, and the biophysics of macromolecules that function as therapeutics or engineered matrices, for example.
Cellular: Studies of how cells sense physicochemical events surrounding and within cells, and how cells transduce these events into biological responses. Specific cell processes of interest include cell growth, differentiation, migration, signal transduction, protein secretion and transport, gene expression and regulation, and cell-matrix interactions.
Mechanobiology: The mechanical properties of cells and biomolecules, cellular/molecular force generation and adhesion, the response of cells to their mechanical microenvironment, and mechanotransduction in response to various physical forces such as fluid shear stress.
Nanomedicine: The engineering of nanoparticles for advanced drug delivery and molecular imaging applications, with particular focus on the interaction of such particles with living cells. Also, the application of nanostructured materials to control the behavior of cells and biomolecules.