学生的数学自我效能感:范围审查

ZDM Pub Date : 2024-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s11858-024-01548-0
Karin Elisabeth Sørlie Street, Lars-Erik Malmberg, Stanislaw Schukajlow
{"title":"学生的数学自我效能感:范围审查","authors":"Karin Elisabeth Sørlie Street, Lars-Erik Malmberg, Stanislaw Schukajlow","doi":"10.1007/s11858-024-01548-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Students’ mathematics self-efficacy (MSE) is strongly associated with learning behaviours and performance, and students’ future career choices. In our scoping review, we screened what <i>substantive foci</i> (conceptualization, directionality and role of MSE, change in MSE, and situational specificity of MSE) have been posed and which <i>methodological approaches</i> (participants, analytical methods, data sources, and congruence of measures) have been used in recent (2018–2022) studies of MSE. Studies of MSE were clearly in the mathematics domain with 21 of 49 included studies exploring specific mathematics areas. The key focus was on strength of MSE. International databases (i.e., PISA) have enabled broad generalization, while in-depth qualitative studies enable minute situation-specificity. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies using hierarchically nested designs (i.e., students in classrooms) enable us to draw conclusions at both individual, classroom, and school levels. The current state-of-the-art indicates methodological advancement is rapid and we are likely to see further methodological-substantive synergies in the field of MSE in future studies. We see the potential and need for future mixed-methods studies that continue the focus on MSE as a multidimensional and dynamic concept. Careful consideration of the theoretical background of the construct of MSE continues to be important to bring the field forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":501335,"journal":{"name":"ZDM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students’ mathematics self-efficacy: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Karin Elisabeth Sørlie Street, Lars-Erik Malmberg, Stanislaw Schukajlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11858-024-01548-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Students’ mathematics self-efficacy (MSE) is strongly associated with learning behaviours and performance, and students’ future career choices. In our scoping review, we screened what <i>substantive foci</i> (conceptualization, directionality and role of MSE, change in MSE, and situational specificity of MSE) have been posed and which <i>methodological approaches</i> (participants, analytical methods, data sources, and congruence of measures) have been used in recent (2018–2022) studies of MSE. Studies of MSE were clearly in the mathematics domain with 21 of 49 included studies exploring specific mathematics areas. The key focus was on strength of MSE. International databases (i.e., PISA) have enabled broad generalization, while in-depth qualitative studies enable minute situation-specificity. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies using hierarchically nested designs (i.e., students in classrooms) enable us to draw conclusions at both individual, classroom, and school levels. The current state-of-the-art indicates methodological advancement is rapid and we are likely to see further methodological-substantive synergies in the field of MSE in future studies. We see the potential and need for future mixed-methods studies that continue the focus on MSE as a multidimensional and dynamic concept. Careful consideration of the theoretical background of the construct of MSE continues to be important to bring the field forward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZDM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZDM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01548-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZDM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01548-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生的数学自我效能感(MSE)与学习行为和学习成绩以及学生未来的职业选择密切相关。在范围综述中,我们筛选了近期(2018-2022 年)关于 MSE 的研究中提出了哪些实质性焦点(MSE 的概念化、方向性和作用、MSE 的变化以及 MSE 的情境特异性)以及使用了哪些方法论方法(参与者、分析方法、数据来源和测量的一致性)。有关 MSE 的研究明显属于数学领域,在 49 项纳入的研究中,有 21 项探讨了具体的数学领域。主要关注点是 MSE 的强度。国际数据库(即国际学生评估项目)实现了广泛的普遍性,而深入的定性研究则实现了细微的具体情况。采用分层嵌套设计(即班级中的学生)的横向和纵向研究使我们能够从个人、班级和学校层面得出结论。目前的最新研究成果表明,研究方法的进步非常迅速,在未来的研究中,我们很可能会看到 MSE 领域在方法和实质上的进一步协同。我们认为,未来的混合方法研究有潜力也有必要继续关注 MSE 这一多维动态概念。认真考虑 MSE 这一概念的理论背景对于推动这一领域的发展仍然十分重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Students’ mathematics self-efficacy: a scoping review

Students’ mathematics self-efficacy: a scoping review

Students’ mathematics self-efficacy (MSE) is strongly associated with learning behaviours and performance, and students’ future career choices. In our scoping review, we screened what substantive foci (conceptualization, directionality and role of MSE, change in MSE, and situational specificity of MSE) have been posed and which methodological approaches (participants, analytical methods, data sources, and congruence of measures) have been used in recent (2018–2022) studies of MSE. Studies of MSE were clearly in the mathematics domain with 21 of 49 included studies exploring specific mathematics areas. The key focus was on strength of MSE. International databases (i.e., PISA) have enabled broad generalization, while in-depth qualitative studies enable minute situation-specificity. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies using hierarchically nested designs (i.e., students in classrooms) enable us to draw conclusions at both individual, classroom, and school levels. The current state-of-the-art indicates methodological advancement is rapid and we are likely to see further methodological-substantive synergies in the field of MSE in future studies. We see the potential and need for future mixed-methods studies that continue the focus on MSE as a multidimensional and dynamic concept. Careful consideration of the theoretical background of the construct of MSE continues to be important to bring the field forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ZDM
ZDM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信