围手术期用强脉冲光预防和改善激光角膜屈光手术后干眼症状。随机临床试验

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
María C. Martínez-Hergueta , Mario Cantó-Cerdán , Maria A. Amesty , M. Jose García-Corral , Laura Casanova-Blanquer , Ana B. Plaza-Puche , Jorge L. Alió , Jorge L. Alió del Barrio
{"title":"围手术期用强脉冲光预防和改善激光角膜屈光手术后干眼症状。随机临床试验","authors":"María C. Martínez-Hergueta ,&nbsp;Mario Cantó-Cerdán ,&nbsp;Maria A. Amesty ,&nbsp;M. Jose García-Corral ,&nbsp;Laura Casanova-Blanquer ,&nbsp;Ana B. Plaza-Puche ,&nbsp;Jorge L. Alió ,&nbsp;Jorge L. Alió del Barrio","doi":"10.1016/j.apjo.2023.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative IPL therapy in preventing postoperative ocular surface disorders in patients undergoing corneal laser refractive surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>randomized, controlled, clinical trial with triple-blinding.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><em>Setting</em>: Vissum Miranza - Alicante; <em>Study population</em>: 61 patients randomized in two groups: 31 study patients (perioperative IPL + laser refractive surgery) and 30 control patients (perioperative placebo + laser refractive surgery). Follow-up was conducted over a 6-month period; <em>Intervention:</em> Each participants underwent three IPL sessions with a two-week interval between each session (pre-surgery, post-surgery week-one, and post-surgery week-three). For controls, placebo was administered following the same protocol. <em>Main outcomes measures</em>: visual outcomes and refraction, slit-lamp examination, corneal topography, visual analogue scale questionnaire and Oculus Keratograph 5 M including tear meniscus height, non-invasive tear break- up time, ocular redness, infrared meibography and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>61 randomized eyes were included. No significant differences were observed in terms of uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), refractive error or corneal aberrations. A statistically significant improvement in OSDI score (change −8.47, p = 0.043), tear meniscus (change 0.05 mm, p = 0.004) and Meibography (change −0.42, p = 0.012) was observed at the third postoperative month in the study group. Additionally, at the sixth postoperative month, there were statistically significant improvements in tear meniscus (change 0.06 mm, p = 0.018), tear break-up-time (change 1.68 s, p = 0.039) and Meibography (change −0.37, p = 0.030).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results suggest that perioperative IPL therapy applied to laser corneal refractive surgery improves objective and subjective ocular surface parameters over non-IPL-treated control patients and early postoperative dry eye symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8594,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098923000294/pdfft?md5=1085007efef0299aa01c2f92ff7a82ae&pid=1-s2.0-S2162098923000294-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative intense pulsed light to prevent and improve symptoms of post-laser corneal refractive surgery dry eye. A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"María C. Martínez-Hergueta ,&nbsp;Mario Cantó-Cerdán ,&nbsp;Maria A. Amesty ,&nbsp;M. Jose García-Corral ,&nbsp;Laura Casanova-Blanquer ,&nbsp;Ana B. Plaza-Puche ,&nbsp;Jorge L. Alió ,&nbsp;Jorge L. Alió del Barrio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apjo.2023.100029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative IPL therapy in preventing postoperative ocular surface disorders in patients undergoing corneal laser refractive surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>randomized, controlled, clinical trial with triple-blinding.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><em>Setting</em>: Vissum Miranza - Alicante; <em>Study population</em>: 61 patients randomized in two groups: 31 study patients (perioperative IPL + laser refractive surgery) and 30 control patients (perioperative placebo + laser refractive surgery). Follow-up was conducted over a 6-month period; <em>Intervention:</em> Each participants underwent three IPL sessions with a two-week interval between each session (pre-surgery, post-surgery week-one, and post-surgery week-three). For controls, placebo was administered following the same protocol. <em>Main outcomes measures</em>: visual outcomes and refraction, slit-lamp examination, corneal topography, visual analogue scale questionnaire and Oculus Keratograph 5 M including tear meniscus height, non-invasive tear break- up time, ocular redness, infrared meibography and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>61 randomized eyes were included. No significant differences were observed in terms of uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), refractive error or corneal aberrations. A statistically significant improvement in OSDI score (change −8.47, p = 0.043), tear meniscus (change 0.05 mm, p = 0.004) and Meibography (change −0.42, p = 0.012) was observed at the third postoperative month in the study group. Additionally, at the sixth postoperative month, there were statistically significant improvements in tear meniscus (change 0.06 mm, p = 0.018), tear break-up-time (change 1.68 s, p = 0.039) and Meibography (change −0.37, p = 0.030).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results suggest that perioperative IPL therapy applied to laser corneal refractive surgery improves objective and subjective ocular surface parameters over non-IPL-treated control patients and early postoperative dry eye symptoms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098923000294/pdfft?md5=1085007efef0299aa01c2f92ff7a82ae&pid=1-s2.0-S2162098923000294-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098923000294\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098923000294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估角膜激光屈光手术患者围手术期 IPL 治疗对预防术后眼表疾病的疗效:Vissum Miranza - Alicante;研究人群:61名患者随机分为两组:31名研究组患者(围手术期IPL+激光屈光手术)和30名对照组患者(围手术期安慰剂+激光屈光手术)。随访期为 6 个月;干预措施:每位参与者接受三次 IPL 治疗,每次治疗间隔两周(手术前、手术后第一周和手术后第三周)。对照组则按照相同的方案服用安慰剂。主要结果测量指标:视觉结果和屈光度、裂隙灯检查、角膜地形图、视觉模拟量表问卷和 Oculus Keratograph 5 M,包括泪液半月板高度、非侵入性泪液破裂时间、眼红、红外线睑板腺造影和眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷。在未矫正和矫正的远距离视力(UDVA、CDVA)、屈光不正或角膜像差方面未观察到明显差异。在术后第三个月,研究组的 OSDI 评分(变化-8.47,p = 0.043)、泪液半月板(变化 0.05 mm,p = 0.004)和 Meibography(变化-0.42,p = 0.012)均有明显改善。此外,在术后第六个月,泪液半月板(变化 0.06 mm,p = 0.018)、泪液破裂时间(变化 1.68 s,p = 0.039)和 Meibography(变化 -0.37,p = 0.030)均有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative intense pulsed light to prevent and improve symptoms of post-laser corneal refractive surgery dry eye. A randomized clinical trial

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative IPL therapy in preventing postoperative ocular surface disorders in patients undergoing corneal laser refractive surgery.

Design

randomized, controlled, clinical trial with triple-blinding.

Methods

Setting: Vissum Miranza - Alicante; Study population: 61 patients randomized in two groups: 31 study patients (perioperative IPL + laser refractive surgery) and 30 control patients (perioperative placebo + laser refractive surgery). Follow-up was conducted over a 6-month period; Intervention: Each participants underwent three IPL sessions with a two-week interval between each session (pre-surgery, post-surgery week-one, and post-surgery week-three). For controls, placebo was administered following the same protocol. Main outcomes measures: visual outcomes and refraction, slit-lamp examination, corneal topography, visual analogue scale questionnaire and Oculus Keratograph 5 M including tear meniscus height, non-invasive tear break- up time, ocular redness, infrared meibography and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire.

Results

61 randomized eyes were included. No significant differences were observed in terms of uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), refractive error or corneal aberrations. A statistically significant improvement in OSDI score (change −8.47, p = 0.043), tear meniscus (change 0.05 mm, p = 0.004) and Meibography (change −0.42, p = 0.012) was observed at the third postoperative month in the study group. Additionally, at the sixth postoperative month, there were statistically significant improvements in tear meniscus (change 0.06 mm, p = 0.018), tear break-up-time (change 1.68 s, p = 0.039) and Meibography (change −0.37, p = 0.030).

Conclusions

Results suggest that perioperative IPL therapy applied to laser corneal refractive surgery improves objective and subjective ocular surface parameters over non-IPL-treated control patients and early postoperative dry eye symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, a bimonthly, peer-reviewed online scientific publication, is an official publication of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology (APAO), a supranational organization which is committed to research, training, learning, publication and knowledge and skill transfers in ophthalmology and visual sciences. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology welcomes review articles on currently hot topics, original, previously unpublished manuscripts describing clinical investigations, clinical observations and clinically relevant laboratory investigations, as well as .perspectives containing personal viewpoints on topics with broad interests. Editorials are published by invitation only. Case reports are generally not considered. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology covers 16 subspecialties and is freely circulated among individual members of the APAO’s member societies, which amounts to a potential readership of over 50,000.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信