脊柱手法治疗可减轻慢性原发性腰背痛,同时降低节段性机械痛和疼痛灾难化:随机安慰剂对照双盲混合实验试验。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"脊柱手法治疗可减轻慢性原发性腰背痛,同时降低节段性机械痛和疼痛灾难化:随机安慰剂对照双盲混合实验试验。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) refers to low back pain that persists over 3 months, that cannot be explained by another chronic condition, and that is associated with emotional distress and disability. Previous studies have shown that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is effective in relieving CPLBP, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. This randomized placebo-controlled dual-blind mixed experimental trial (NCT05162924) aimed to investigate the efficacy of SMT to improve CPLBP and its underlying mechanisms. Ninety-eight individuals with CPLBP and 49 controls were recruited. Individuals with CPLBP received SMT (n = 49) or a control intervention (n = 49), 12 times over 4 weeks. The primary outcomes were CPLBP intensity (0–100 on a numerical rating scale) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included </span>pressure pain thresholds<span> in 4 body regions, pain catastrophizing, Central Sensitization Inventory, depressive symptoms, and anxiety scores. Individuals with CPLBP showed widespread </span></span>mechanical hyperalgesia (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .001) and higher scores for all questionnaires (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). SMT reduced pain intensity compared with the control intervention (mean difference: −11.7 [95% confidence interval, −11.0 to −12.5], <em>P</em> = .01), but not disability (<em>P</em><span><span> = .5). Similar mild to moderate adverse events were reported in both groups. Mechanical </span>hyperalgesia at the manipulated segment was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .05). Pain catastrophizing was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (<em>P</em><span> &lt; .05), but this effect was not significant after accounting for changes in clinical pain. Although the reduction of segmental mechanical hyperalgesia likely contributes to the clinical benefits of SMT, the role of pain catastrophizing remains to be clarified.</span></p></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><p>This randomized controlled trial<span> found that 12 sessions of SMT yield greater relief of CPLBP than a control intervention. These clinical effects were independent of expectations, and accompanied by an attenuation of hyperalgesia in the targeted segment and a modulation of pain catastrophizing.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"25 8","pages":"Article 104500"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction of Chronic Primary Low Back Pain by Spinal Manipulative Therapy is Accompanied by Decreases in Segmental Mechanical Hyperalgesia and Pain Catastrophizing: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Dual-blind Mixed Experimental Trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) refers to low back pain that persists over 3 months, that cannot be explained by another chronic condition, and that is associated with emotional distress and disability. Previous studies have shown that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is effective in relieving CPLBP, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. This randomized placebo-controlled dual-blind mixed experimental trial (NCT05162924) aimed to investigate the efficacy of SMT to improve CPLBP and its underlying mechanisms. Ninety-eight individuals with CPLBP and 49 controls were recruited. Individuals with CPLBP received SMT (n = 49) or a control intervention (n = 49), 12 times over 4 weeks. The primary outcomes were CPLBP intensity (0–100 on a numerical rating scale) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included </span>pressure pain thresholds<span> in 4 body regions, pain catastrophizing, Central Sensitization Inventory, depressive symptoms, and anxiety scores. Individuals with CPLBP showed widespread </span></span>mechanical hyperalgesia (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .001) and higher scores for all questionnaires (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). SMT reduced pain intensity compared with the control intervention (mean difference: −11.7 [95% confidence interval, −11.0 to −12.5], <em>P</em> = .01), but not disability (<em>P</em><span><span> = .5). Similar mild to moderate adverse events were reported in both groups. Mechanical </span>hyperalgesia at the manipulated segment was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .05). Pain catastrophizing was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (<em>P</em><span> &lt; .05), but this effect was not significant after accounting for changes in clinical pain. Although the reduction of segmental mechanical hyperalgesia likely contributes to the clinical benefits of SMT, the role of pain catastrophizing remains to be clarified.</span></p></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><p>This randomized controlled trial<span> found that 12 sessions of SMT yield greater relief of CPLBP than a control intervention. These clinical effects were independent of expectations, and accompanied by an attenuation of hyperalgesia in the targeted segment and a modulation of pain catastrophizing.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"25 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 104500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152659002400381X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152659002400381X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性原发性腰背痛(CPLBP)是指持续三个月以上的腰背痛,无法用其他慢性病来解释,并且与情绪困扰和残疾有关。以往的研究表明,脊柱手法治疗(SMT)能有效缓解 CPLBP,但其潜在机制仍难以捉摸。这项随机安慰剂对照双盲混合实验试验(NCT05162924)旨在研究脊柱手法治疗对改善 CPLBP 的疗效及其内在机制。试验招募了 98 名 CPLBP 患者和 49 名对照组患者。CPLBP患者在四周内接受12次SMT(49人)或对照组干预(49人)。主要结果是 CPLBP 强度(0-100 分值)和残疾程度(Oswestry 残疾指数)。次要结果包括四个身体区域的压痛阈值、疼痛灾难化、中枢敏感化清单、抑郁症状和焦虑评分。CPLBP 患者表现出广泛的机械性痛觉减退(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduction of Chronic Primary Low Back Pain by Spinal Manipulative Therapy is Accompanied by Decreases in Segmental Mechanical Hyperalgesia and Pain Catastrophizing: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Dual-blind Mixed Experimental Trial

Chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) refers to low back pain that persists over 3 months, that cannot be explained by another chronic condition, and that is associated with emotional distress and disability. Previous studies have shown that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is effective in relieving CPLBP, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. This randomized placebo-controlled dual-blind mixed experimental trial (NCT05162924) aimed to investigate the efficacy of SMT to improve CPLBP and its underlying mechanisms. Ninety-eight individuals with CPLBP and 49 controls were recruited. Individuals with CPLBP received SMT (n = 49) or a control intervention (n = 49), 12 times over 4 weeks. The primary outcomes were CPLBP intensity (0–100 on a numerical rating scale) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included pressure pain thresholds in 4 body regions, pain catastrophizing, Central Sensitization Inventory, depressive symptoms, and anxiety scores. Individuals with CPLBP showed widespread mechanical hyperalgesia (P < .001) and higher scores for all questionnaires (P < .001). SMT reduced pain intensity compared with the control intervention (mean difference: −11.7 [95% confidence interval, −11.0 to −12.5], P = .01), but not disability (P = .5). Similar mild to moderate adverse events were reported in both groups. Mechanical hyperalgesia at the manipulated segment was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (P < .05). Pain catastrophizing was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (P < .05), but this effect was not significant after accounting for changes in clinical pain. Although the reduction of segmental mechanical hyperalgesia likely contributes to the clinical benefits of SMT, the role of pain catastrophizing remains to be clarified.

Perspective

This randomized controlled trial found that 12 sessions of SMT yield greater relief of CPLBP than a control intervention. These clinical effects were independent of expectations, and accompanied by an attenuation of hyperalgesia in the targeted segment and a modulation of pain catastrophizing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信