使用改良席尔默试验测量唾液腺功能低下/唾液分泌过少:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Christoph Matthias Schoppmeier, Malin Janson, Karolin Höfer, Isabelle Graf, Michael Jochen Wicht, Anna Greta Barbe
{"title":"使用改良席尔默试验测量唾液腺功能低下/唾液分泌过少:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Christoph Matthias Schoppmeier,&nbsp;Malin Janson,&nbsp;Karolin Höfer,&nbsp;Isabelle Graf,&nbsp;Michael Jochen Wicht,&nbsp;Anna Greta Barbe","doi":"10.1111/eos.12977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although dry mouth is a relatively common condition, salivary flow is not routinely measured in dental clinical practice. Moreover, existing data regarding the use of the modified Schirmer test (MST) for the screening of dry mouth has not been summarized. This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, aimed to determine whether the modified Schirmer test can be used to identify dry mouth. The databases of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and CENTRAL (CRD42023393843) were systematically searched to retrieve articles published until 9th November 2023. Among the 343 original articles retrieved, six met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1150 patients, comprising 710 (61.7%) women and 440 (38.3%) men (mean age, 47.1 ± 7.3 years), were included. The meta-analysis revealed a weak correlation coefficient of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mover>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mo>¯</mo>\n </mover>\n <annotation>$\\bar{r}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> = 0.42 (95% Cl: 0.29–0.55) between MST and the unstimulated salivary flow rate. Therefore, while the MST might offer a simple and accessible alternative for initial screening in the future, especially in non-specialized settings, its variability in sensitivity and specificity, along with an actual lack of standardization, necessitates cautious interpretation. Further studies are necessary before recommending the test in clinical routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"132 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eos.12977","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the modified Schirmer test to measure salivary gland hypofunction/hyposalivation: Systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Matthias Schoppmeier,&nbsp;Malin Janson,&nbsp;Karolin Höfer,&nbsp;Isabelle Graf,&nbsp;Michael Jochen Wicht,&nbsp;Anna Greta Barbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eos.12977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although dry mouth is a relatively common condition, salivary flow is not routinely measured in dental clinical practice. Moreover, existing data regarding the use of the modified Schirmer test (MST) for the screening of dry mouth has not been summarized. This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, aimed to determine whether the modified Schirmer test can be used to identify dry mouth. The databases of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and CENTRAL (CRD42023393843) were systematically searched to retrieve articles published until 9th November 2023. Among the 343 original articles retrieved, six met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1150 patients, comprising 710 (61.7%) women and 440 (38.3%) men (mean age, 47.1 ± 7.3 years), were included. The meta-analysis revealed a weak correlation coefficient of <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>r</mi>\\n <mo>¯</mo>\\n </mover>\\n <annotation>$\\\\bar{r}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> = 0.42 (95% Cl: 0.29–0.55) between MST and the unstimulated salivary flow rate. Therefore, while the MST might offer a simple and accessible alternative for initial screening in the future, especially in non-specialized settings, its variability in sensitivity and specificity, along with an actual lack of standardization, necessitates cautious interpretation. Further studies are necessary before recommending the test in clinical routine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"132 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eos.12977\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.12977\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.12977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然口干是一种比较常见的病症,但在牙科临床实践中并没有对唾液流量进行常规测量。此外,关于使用改良施尔默试验(MST)筛查口干症的现有数据也没有总结。本系统综述和荟萃分析根据 PRISMA 指南进行,旨在确定改良施尔默试验是否可用于识别口干症。我们对 PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect 和 CENTRAL (CRD42023393843) 等数据库进行了系统检索,以检索截至 2023 年 11 月 9 日发表的文章。在检索到的 343 篇原创文章中,有 6 篇符合纳入标准。共纳入 1150 名患者,其中女性 710 人(61.7%),男性 440 人(38.3%)(平均年龄为 47.1 ± 7.3 岁)。荟萃分析显示,MST 与非刺激唾液流速之间的相关系数为 r ¯ $\bar{r}$ = 0.42(95% Cl:0.29-0.55),相关性较弱。因此,尽管 MST 可为未来的初步筛查提供一种简单易行的替代方法,尤其是在非专业环境中,但其灵敏度和特异性的可变性,以及实际缺乏标准化,需要谨慎解释。在建议将该检测用于临床常规之前,有必要进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of the modified Schirmer test to measure salivary gland hypofunction/hyposalivation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Use of the modified Schirmer test to measure salivary gland hypofunction/hyposalivation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Although dry mouth is a relatively common condition, salivary flow is not routinely measured in dental clinical practice. Moreover, existing data regarding the use of the modified Schirmer test (MST) for the screening of dry mouth has not been summarized. This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, aimed to determine whether the modified Schirmer test can be used to identify dry mouth. The databases of PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and CENTRAL (CRD42023393843) were systematically searched to retrieve articles published until 9th November 2023. Among the 343 original articles retrieved, six met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1150 patients, comprising 710 (61.7%) women and 440 (38.3%) men (mean age, 47.1 ± 7.3 years), were included. The meta-analysis revealed a weak correlation coefficient of r ¯ $\bar{r}$  = 0.42 (95% Cl: 0.29–0.55) between MST and the unstimulated salivary flow rate. Therefore, while the MST might offer a simple and accessible alternative for initial screening in the future, especially in non-specialized settings, its variability in sensitivity and specificity, along with an actual lack of standardization, necessitates cautious interpretation. Further studies are necessary before recommending the test in clinical routine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信