使用洗手间传播病毒:定量微生物风险评估。

IF 4.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sarah E. Abney, Ciara A. Higham, Amanda M. Wilson, M. Khalid Ijaz, Julie McKinney, Kelly A. Reynolds, Charles P. Gerba
{"title":"使用洗手间传播病毒:定量微生物风险评估。","authors":"Sarah E. Abney,&nbsp;Ciara A. Higham,&nbsp;Amanda M. Wilson,&nbsp;M. Khalid Ijaz,&nbsp;Julie McKinney,&nbsp;Kelly A. Reynolds,&nbsp;Charles P. Gerba","doi":"10.1007/s12560-023-09580-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Restroom use has been implicated in a number of viral outbreaks. In this study, we apply quantitative microbial risk assessment to quantify the risk of viral transmission by contaminated restroom fomites. We estimate risk from high-touch fomite surfaces (entrance/exit door, toilet seat) for three viruses of interest (SARS-CoV-2, adenovirus, norovirus) through eight exposure scenarios involving differing user behaviors, and the use of hand sanitizer following each scenario. We assessed the impacts of several sequences of fomite contacts in the restroom, reflecting the variability of human behavior, on infection risks for these viruses. Touching of the toilet seat was assumed to model adjustment of the seat (open vs. closed), a common touch point in single-user restrooms (home, small business, hospital). A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted for each exposure scenario (10,000 simulations each). Norovirus resulted in the highest probability of infection for all exposure scenarios with fomite surfaces. Post-restroom automatic-dispensing hand sanitizer use reduced the probability of infection for each virus by up to 99.75%. Handwashing within the restroom, an important risk-reduction intervention, was not found to be as effective as use of a non-touch hand sanitizer dispenser for reducing risk to near or below 1/1,000,000, a commonly used risk threshold for comparison.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":563,"journal":{"name":"Food and Environmental Virology","volume":"16 1","pages":"65 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10963455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transmission of Viruses from Restroom Use: A Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E. Abney,&nbsp;Ciara A. Higham,&nbsp;Amanda M. Wilson,&nbsp;M. Khalid Ijaz,&nbsp;Julie McKinney,&nbsp;Kelly A. Reynolds,&nbsp;Charles P. Gerba\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12560-023-09580-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Restroom use has been implicated in a number of viral outbreaks. In this study, we apply quantitative microbial risk assessment to quantify the risk of viral transmission by contaminated restroom fomites. We estimate risk from high-touch fomite surfaces (entrance/exit door, toilet seat) for three viruses of interest (SARS-CoV-2, adenovirus, norovirus) through eight exposure scenarios involving differing user behaviors, and the use of hand sanitizer following each scenario. We assessed the impacts of several sequences of fomite contacts in the restroom, reflecting the variability of human behavior, on infection risks for these viruses. Touching of the toilet seat was assumed to model adjustment of the seat (open vs. closed), a common touch point in single-user restrooms (home, small business, hospital). A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted for each exposure scenario (10,000 simulations each). Norovirus resulted in the highest probability of infection for all exposure scenarios with fomite surfaces. Post-restroom automatic-dispensing hand sanitizer use reduced the probability of infection for each virus by up to 99.75%. Handwashing within the restroom, an important risk-reduction intervention, was not found to be as effective as use of a non-touch hand sanitizer dispenser for reducing risk to near or below 1/1,000,000, a commonly used risk threshold for comparison.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Environmental Virology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"65 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10963455/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Environmental Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-023-09580-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Environmental Virology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-023-09580-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洗手间的使用与一些病毒爆发有关。在本研究中,我们采用定量微生物风险评估来量化受污染的洗手间吸附物传播病毒的风险。我们通过涉及不同使用者行为的八种暴露情景,以及在每种情景后使用洗手液的情况,估算了三种相关病毒(SARS-CoV-2、腺病毒、诺如病毒)通过高接触表面(入口/出口门、马桶座圈)传播的风险。我们评估了洗手间内几种飞沫接触序列对这些病毒感染风险的影响,这反映了人类行为的多变性。触摸马桶盖被假定为马桶盖调整(打开与关闭)的模型,这是单用户洗手间(家庭、小型企业、医院)中常见的接触点。对每种暴露情景都进行了蒙特卡罗模拟(每种情景模拟 10,000 次)。在所有接触酵母表面的情况下,诺如病毒的感染概率最高。洗手间后使用自动分配洗手液可将每种病毒的感染概率降低 99.75%。在洗手间内洗手是一项重要的降低风险干预措施,但在将风险降低到接近或低于 1/1,000,000 这一常用的比较风险阈值方面,使用非接触式洗手液分配器的效果并不理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Transmission of Viruses from Restroom Use: A Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment

Transmission of Viruses from Restroom Use: A Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment

Restroom use has been implicated in a number of viral outbreaks. In this study, we apply quantitative microbial risk assessment to quantify the risk of viral transmission by contaminated restroom fomites. We estimate risk from high-touch fomite surfaces (entrance/exit door, toilet seat) for three viruses of interest (SARS-CoV-2, adenovirus, norovirus) through eight exposure scenarios involving differing user behaviors, and the use of hand sanitizer following each scenario. We assessed the impacts of several sequences of fomite contacts in the restroom, reflecting the variability of human behavior, on infection risks for these viruses. Touching of the toilet seat was assumed to model adjustment of the seat (open vs. closed), a common touch point in single-user restrooms (home, small business, hospital). A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted for each exposure scenario (10,000 simulations each). Norovirus resulted in the highest probability of infection for all exposure scenarios with fomite surfaces. Post-restroom automatic-dispensing hand sanitizer use reduced the probability of infection for each virus by up to 99.75%. Handwashing within the restroom, an important risk-reduction intervention, was not found to be as effective as use of a non-touch hand sanitizer dispenser for reducing risk to near or below 1/1,000,000, a commonly used risk threshold for comparison.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Environmental Virology
Food and Environmental Virology ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Food and Environmental Virology publishes original articles, notes and review articles on any aspect relating to the transmission of pathogenic viruses via the environment (water, air, soil etc.) and foods. This includes epidemiological studies, identification of novel or emerging pathogens, methods of analysis or characterisation, studies on survival and elimination, and development of procedural controls for industrial processes, e.g. HACCP plans. The journal will cover all aspects of this important area, and encompass studies on any human, animal, and plant pathogenic virus which is capable of transmission via the environment or food.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信