观众还是影响者?人群对 NFL 获胜的影响:自然实验

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
J. Ehrlich, Joel Potter, Shane Sanders, Rodney Paul
{"title":"观众还是影响者?人群对 NFL 获胜的影响:自然实验","authors":"J. Ehrlich, Joel Potter, Shane Sanders, Rodney Paul","doi":"10.32731/ijsf/191.022024.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has determined that home field advantage (HFA) is positively related to crowd density. Isolating this effect is a substantial empirical challenge as crowd density is endogenous with home win-likelihood via fan interest. We consider a natural-experimental setting that introduces exogenous crowd-density variation into National Football League (NFL) games. COVID-19 safety protocols allow us to disentangle crowd-presence, crowd-density, and built-environment effects upon HFA. We find strong evidence that crowd presence is a significant, substantial source of HFA, but crowd density is not. No-crowd games in 2020 featured no measurable HFA conditional upon team strengths, whereas partially fan-restricted games featured no significant decline in HFA relative to games without crowd restrictions (2016‒2019 and 2021). Results suggest HFA is fully attributable to crowd presence, with no evidence of stadium familiarity or travel distance effects. Betting markets efficiently predicted the partial-crowd effect from season’s outset but adjusted incrementally (behaviorally) to incorporate the true no-crowd effect only by season’s end.","PeriodicalId":45894,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spectators or Influencers? The Crowd Effect Upon Winning in the NFL: A Natural Experiment\",\"authors\":\"J. Ehrlich, Joel Potter, Shane Sanders, Rodney Paul\",\"doi\":\"10.32731/ijsf/191.022024.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous research has determined that home field advantage (HFA) is positively related to crowd density. Isolating this effect is a substantial empirical challenge as crowd density is endogenous with home win-likelihood via fan interest. We consider a natural-experimental setting that introduces exogenous crowd-density variation into National Football League (NFL) games. COVID-19 safety protocols allow us to disentangle crowd-presence, crowd-density, and built-environment effects upon HFA. We find strong evidence that crowd presence is a significant, substantial source of HFA, but crowd density is not. No-crowd games in 2020 featured no measurable HFA conditional upon team strengths, whereas partially fan-restricted games featured no significant decline in HFA relative to games without crowd restrictions (2016‒2019 and 2021). Results suggest HFA is fully attributable to crowd presence, with no evidence of stadium familiarity or travel distance effects. Betting markets efficiently predicted the partial-crowd effect from season’s outset but adjusted incrementally (behaviorally) to incorporate the true no-crowd effect only by season’s end.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sport Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sport Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32731/ijsf/191.022024.01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32731/ijsf/191.022024.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,主场优势(HFA)与观众密度呈正相关。由于观众密度是通过球迷的兴趣与主场获胜可能性内生的,因此将这种效应分离出来是一项巨大的经验挑战。我们考虑了一种自然-实验环境,即在全国橄榄球联盟(NFL)比赛中引入外生人群密度变化。COVID-19 安全协议使我们能够区分人群存在、人群密度和建筑环境对 HFA 的影响。我们发现有力的证据表明,人群的存在是 HFA 的一个重要的实质性来源,但人群密度并非如此。2020 年没有观众的比赛,根据球队实力,没有可测量的 HFA,而部分有球迷限制的比赛,相对于没有观众限制的比赛(2016-2019 年和 2021 年),HFA 没有显著下降。结果表明,HFA 完全归因于人群的存在,没有证据表明有体育场熟悉度或旅行距离的影响。投注市场从赛季一开始就有效地预测了部分人群效应,但到赛季结束时才逐步调整(行为)以纳入真正的无人群效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spectators or Influencers? The Crowd Effect Upon Winning in the NFL: A Natural Experiment
Previous research has determined that home field advantage (HFA) is positively related to crowd density. Isolating this effect is a substantial empirical challenge as crowd density is endogenous with home win-likelihood via fan interest. We consider a natural-experimental setting that introduces exogenous crowd-density variation into National Football League (NFL) games. COVID-19 safety protocols allow us to disentangle crowd-presence, crowd-density, and built-environment effects upon HFA. We find strong evidence that crowd presence is a significant, substantial source of HFA, but crowd density is not. No-crowd games in 2020 featured no measurable HFA conditional upon team strengths, whereas partially fan-restricted games featured no significant decline in HFA relative to games without crowd restrictions (2016‒2019 and 2021). Results suggest HFA is fully attributable to crowd presence, with no evidence of stadium familiarity or travel distance effects. Betting markets efficiently predicted the partial-crowd effect from season’s outset but adjusted incrementally (behaviorally) to incorporate the true no-crowd effect only by season’s end.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sport Finance
International Journal of Sport Finance HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信